Historical literature has entered a bottleneck period of development, and more than one god has expressed concern about the future. The problem of homogenization is serious, and it is the most urgent problem to be solved.

There are a lot of people who are trying to find a new path, and I'm trying.

It was in this context that it became my choice.

After "Historical Celebrities in the City", I feel that what I should think about is also more or less clear.

Although the indiscriminate entry of literature is an innovation at the expense of the seriousness of history, there are more and more authors, too lazy to look up the information, chanting the slogan "the story is the most important", and beginning to reclaim history as a barren land.

Is history really as barren as a blank sheet of paper, allowing them to paint freely?

I now bring together "crops" from different historical periods and show them in one book. So that readers with bright eyes can see, is history really a wasteland?

Could it be that the figures of the ancestors who worked this land have been ignored?

Although, in the end, my methods are the same as theirs, they are all processing history, and even more avant-garde than them in some places, after all, they are just too lazy to turn the book, and what they write is still in the original frame, and I directly lifted the table and smashed the frame!

If you go beyond half a step, you will be a talent, and if you go beyond half a step, you will be crazy.

I'm crazy!

At the beginning of the birth of the traversal text, such as "Walking with the Song", it was mainly about exploring the possibility of survival. Today's "Lingao Qiming" still has this classical color.

Later, routines began to emerge to promote the course of history and change the fate of China.

This routine is so classic, so classic that we still have it in it.

Even I, the self-proclaimed smasher of the frame, are still stuck in it.

It's not something we can decide, it's a historical background that our history has left us, and even if I'm a monster, I have to accept my fate. It is true that our history has had too many unsatisfactory directions, especially in the late Ming Dynasty.

So I'm a monster, and I've set the goal of chaos at the end of the Ming Dynasty.

Not many people have written about whether the humanity of the time-traveler is glorious or not, and what it means to the natives? Not many people have written about the "ecological relationship" between the traversers, the chain of suspicion, what the common basic interests are, and not many people dare to give the protagonist too powerful an enemy, so as not to upset the reader.

But I don't care, a monster.

Some readers have said that my text can't be understood, and that's because their IQ has been spoiled by Xiaobaiwen. Maybe this sentence offended many people, but I'm crazy!

In fact, my essay is also very white, because the level is very bad, and I can't help but be white.

But there's always something, and it's time to write about it.

Many people have noticed that traditional historical texts are being supported by Dian Niang. Although I am also a little mother's child, I am a freak after all, and my future is uncertain!

Therefore, we need everyone's support even more!

This book has been signed A, ask for a point to ask for a recommendation!