"According to Mr. Chen, the classification of naturalism can be changed."

"Nowadays, some people classify plants by flowers, some by leaves, and some at all because they don't have much connection, just need to classify all the plants."

"How is the classification correct? Personally, I don't think it's right or wrong, it's just whether it's accepted by everyone. And these are all artificially separated. ”

"Isn't it ridiculous, just as Mr. Chan and his henchmen artificially divide people into different classes, and think that this is the same as the way plants are divided according to flowers, and that it helps to make it a systematic and scientific division?"

"What is class, in fact? No one can see, and there is no kind of paint called class, that stains everyone. ”

"It's like a plant, so why does it have to be a system? Why can't we admit that seemingly similar plants and animals are different? Why do whales have to be classified as mammals? Why can't we think that everything that swims in the water has fins is a fish? ”

"If science is about classification, about drawing different labels and attaching them, and calling them systems to facilitate research, and summarizing the common denominators, I think this is a fork in the road."

"It's not that it's wrong, but that it's just a research method, and it doesn't prove that this classification method is unique and correct, or that it's the only way to help research."

"If we look at it according to Mr. Chen's so-called particles of all things and the first matter, people are all human beings, and people are the same people, but according to the rest of the materials that people control, the so-called land and machines, they are divided into different classes."

But in fact, why is Mr. Chen so sure that there is no indescribable, spiritual, spiritual thing above the material that is above the material? This kind of thing creates different cultures, different languages, different skin colors, different habits, and so on, so why can't it be divided into different races, different races, different spirits, and different hearts? ”

"The fact that whales are not fish is also artificially divided. But what is a fish? Isn't it defined by man? If I define a fish as a species that swims in the water with fins, tails, and no hair, would whales not be fish? ”

"In this way, you can see that what you take for granted is not taken for granted. Mr. Chen and his henchmen called this method of division the right way, and then secretly made people think that their method of dividing people was also the right way. ”

Looking at Mr. Chen's previous articles, this ambition to grasp the right to speak is revealed everywhere. He wanted to unify everything, a unified way of naming, a unified way of translating words, a unified way of dividing and distinguishing the categories of animals and plants, and a unified way of naming things that could not be re-divided......"

"If these are all improvements for the future, that's understandable, and I personally support it. But he wants to unify even the basis of understanding the world, which is terrible and contrary to human freedom. As I said before, the basis of the definition of something determines everything that follows, such as the fish I have already talked about, and in the whole world that is the view and opinion of the foundation of the world. It's dangerous. ”

According to Mr. Chen's theory of the particles of all things, it seems that naturalism and decomposition do not need to separate organic matter from inorganic matter at all. Because he believes that the essence of life does not exist, so the foundation does not exist, then this method of division is wrong and unnecessary. ”

"He even joked that it was just a way to divide people and ducks according to whether they had two legs or not, and asked me to give a generalized definition of what is called 'organic,' just like the birds they defined as birds, otherwise it would be meaningless."

However, is it really pointless? Is it true that bats are considered birds, and they affect the functioning of the whole world? If not, what is his so-called meaning? Now he has to define whether it even makes sense, who does he think he is? ”

Indeed, in terms of his so-called method of defining the similarities, which makes sense in his world, my definition of organic matter is indeed inaccurate and flawed. He could easily point out that carbonic acid is necessary for plants and animals, and that water is necessary for plants and animals, and that these should be divided into organic matter, and he unilaterally declares his victory, because it is true that these things can be synthesized from inorganic matter. ”

"Indeed, if I say that only what the essence of life can transform is the definition of organic matter, I need to verify and list all the 'inorganic matter' before Mr. Chen can fight. However, we all know that everything in the world is so vast that it is difficult for me to organize it even if I have exhausted my whole life, so it seems that he is really invincible. ”

"He confronted me again: Vinegar is made from grain, and no one has ever been able to combine it from any natural world without the conversion of the 'essence of life.' And said that according to my definition, this must be considered an organic matter. ”

He asked: But is there any significance in dividing vinegar into organic matter for us to study vinegar? According to the current division method, vinegar is an acid, so it can be neutralized with alkali, so it can react with sodium carbonate to release carbon dioxide gas and so on. But he asked me, what can be gained by turning vinegar into organic matter? Aside from the fact that this thing has been transformed by the life essence, is there any point in the research itself? ”

He asked again, if all the similarities are only through the transformation of the life essence, then it is not of great significance, because only such a big similarity does not make anything meaningful with these similarities.

He even said that the only reason I was doing this was to prove that there was something transcendent and beyond the material. If it does not exist, or if it will prove to be non-existent in the future, then this division is meaningless. ”

"However, I would like to say that the two words of possibility in what he calls possible meaninglessness are the greatest meaning, because this is the basis of the world, and it is also the point from which we understand the world."

"But, folks, is there anything more meaningful than the shaping of a worldview? His so-called meaninglessness is nothing more than an arrogant belief that the worldview he understands is correct, so I say that it is meaningless. But what if he's wrong? If there really is such a thing as the essence of life, wouldn't it completely change our view of the world? How could this be pointless? ”

In his view, the macrocosm of the world is only matter and energy. In Minjun, where his doctrine was sought after, there were even those who arrogantly believed that only energy was sufficient, and that with the right methods, the whole world could be created. What an arrogant state of mind? Those who see the world in this way will lack humanity and fear the whole world, and will plunge the world into immoral chaos. ”

"So, then, let Mr. Chen let us see with our own eyes a kind of hope, a hope that can bypass the unbridgeable gulf between life and non-life, even the slightest hope."

In that case, even if it cannot prove that the life essence may not exist or may not not exist, it at least proves that Mr. Chen's view of the world is somewhat grounded...... At least, it's not necessarily wrong. ”

"And now, Mr. Chen can't prove that my statement is wrong, and all he can do is prove that his statement is right and worth believing."

"Even if he teased him like that, according to his theory I am invincible, he can't prove that the life essence doesn't exist, and I can easily figure out the task that makes it difficult for him to accomplish - for example, if he is asked to make a person out of inorganic matter now, he will definitely not be able to make it."

"So, what Mr. Chen wants to prove now is not that I'm wrong, but just to prove as much as he can that he might be right. That's the only thing you can do, and that's the only sane choice. ”

In the face of this aggressive and quibbling reply, Jian Chen quickly gave a very simple reply.

Just two words.

"Okay."