, Shao has ten defeats, the public has ten victories, although the soldiers are strong, there is nothing to do. Shao Fan, etiquette, public body is natural, this way is better than one. Shao to reverse, public obedience to lead the world, this righteousness is better than two. At the end of the Han Dynasty, the government was lost in the wide, and Shao was wide and wide, so it was not taken, and the public correction was fierce and up and down the knowledge system, and this rule won three also. Shao outside the wide internal taboo, the use of people and doubts, the appointment of only relatives and children, easy to simplify outside the public and clear inside, no doubt about the use of people, only the appropriate, not far and near, this degree is better than four. Shao more and less decision, lost in the future, the public policy has to be done, the response is endless, this plan wins five also. Shao because of the wealth of the world, high discussion to collect reputation, the good words of the scholar to decorate the outside of the return of the more, the public to treat people, sincere and act, not for the beauty of the vain, to thrift, and the meritorious people are not stingy, the loyalty of the scholar is far-sighted and the real people are used for the original use, this virtue wins six also. Shao see people hungry and cold, the form of compassion in the color, what it does not see, or do not think about it, the so-called woman's benevolent ear, public in the current small things, sometimes suddenly, as for the big things, and the four seas, the grace of the addition, all over its hope, although not seen, the thoughtful, all of which are good, this benevolence is better than seven. Shao ministers fight for power, slander and confusion, the public is the way, infiltration is not good, this Ming wins eight also. Shao is unknowable, the public office is to enter the courtesy, not the right to the law, this article is better than nine. Shao Hao is a false situation, I don't know what the soldiers want, the public is a small number of people, the soldiers are like gods, the soldiers are afraid of it, the enemy is afraid of it, and this martial arts is better than ten. ”

Taizu smiled and said: "As Qing said, he is lonely and deserved!" ”

Jia also said: "Shaofang attacked Gongsun Hao in the north, and because of his expedition, he could take Lu Bu in the east." If you don't take the cloth first, if Shao is a coward, the cloth will help, which is also deeply harmful. ”

Taizu said: "Yes." ”

Doesn't it feel very similar, almost exactly the same as Xun Yu's story.

1. The time points are all before the destruction of Lu Bu, basically after Yuan Shao wrote a letter to humiliate Cao Cao.

2. Cao Cao's first question is recorded in the "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms" as "Today, I will seek injustice, and I am invincible, what is it?" ", and "Fu Zi" is "originally supported the people of Jizhou, green, and from it, the land is wide and the army is strong, and the number is not inferior." I want to ask for it, but I can't beat it, how? The focus of the two paragraphs is basically the same, both of which are asking how to deal with the "invincible" Yuan Shao.

3. At the beginning, the answer took Liu Bang and Xiang Yu as an example, and the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is "The success or failure of the ancients, honest and talented, although weak must be strong, not others, although strong and weak, the survival of Liu and Xiang is enough to observe." There is also "Fu Zi" on "Liu and Xiang are invincible, and they are well known." Han Zu is only outwitted; Although Xiang Yu is strong, he will eventually become a bird. ”

4. Xun Yu put forward the "Theory of Four Victories" on "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", and Guo Jia also had the "Theory of Ten Victories and Ten Defeats" on "Fu Zi", but the core content is almost the same, and they all use the sentence structure.

5. After the two finished the tirade, they both described Cao Cao as very happy, "Three Kingdoms" is "Taizu Yue", and "Fu Zi" is expressed in a bunch of words, "Taizu smiled and said: 'As Qing said, Lonely He De is worthy of it!'" ’”

6. The specific strategic measures were followed by it, that is, to fight Yuan Shao and first level Lu Bu. "Three Kingdoms" is "If you don't take Lu Bu first, Hebei is not easy to map." In "Fu Zi", it is "Shaofang attacked Gongsun Hao in the north, and because of his expedition, he took Lu Bu in the east." If you don't take the cloth first, if Shao is a coward, the cloth will help, which is also deeply harmful. ”

7. "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" and "Fu Zi" all have "Taizu said: 'Yes.'" ’”

The similarity in one or two places can also be described as coincidence, or "the wise man sees the same". But if the same is similar everywhere, then it can't be a coincidence anymore.

The biggest difference between the stories of Xun Yu and Guo Jia is that one has Xun Yu as the protagonist, the other has Guo Jia as the protagonist, and the others are basically carved out of a template. Do you think Cao Cao could repeat the same conversation at the same time? And it's all long dialogues, doesn't Cao Cao himself have any doubts?

It's simply impossible! Therefore, the story of Xun Yu's "Four Victories" in "Three Kingdoms" and Guo Jia's "Ten Victories and Ten Defeats" in "Fu Zi" must be true and false.

[Who is true and who is false? 】

So who is real and who is fake? Personally, I think that Xun Yu's "Four Victories" in "Three Kingdoms" is true, and Guo Jia's "Ten Victories and Ten Defeats" is false.

Here's why:

1. The relevant record of Xun Yu's "Four Victories" in "Three Kingdoms" is far more detailed than the record of Guo Jia's "Ten Victories and Ten Defeats" in "Fu Zi". There is not only the cause of the story, "Shao Yijiao, and Taizu Shu, his words are slow." Cao Cao's worries about the current situation and Xun Yu's corresponding countermeasures are further described later. On the contrary, the story of Guo Jia in "Fu Zi" seems to have no beginning and no end, and it is more like an incomplete excerpt and adaptation of Xun Yu's story in comparison.

2. Moreover, "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" is the most authoritative historical material of the Three Kingdoms from ancient times to the present, and this is not one of them, and it has been recognized by all dynasties. In addition, Chen Shou, the author of "Three Kingdoms", is recognized as very rigorous in his studies, even to the point of being harsh, and he can not use it as long as he has doubts about some materials, but this also makes "Three Kingdoms" too few words and incomplete content.

Chen Shou was a figure of the Shu and Jin dynasties, who experienced that era first-hand and spent nearly a decade writing the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Therefore, the reliability of the "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms" is very high, and it is eventually considered to be one of the official histories of China, and it is also called the "first four histories" along with the "Historical Records", "Book of Han", and "Book of the Later Han".

Although Fu Xuan, the author of "Fu Zi", was also a figure in the Wei and Jin dynasties and participated in the editing of "Wei Shu", he was still famous in history as a writer and thinker, and his "Fu Zi" was not widely recognized in history.

Therefore, from an authoritative point of view, we mainly focus on the original text in the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms".

3. Xun Yu often makes long speeches in history, while Guo Jia is very rare. This is evident in the "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms", in the biography of Xun Yu, we can find several places where Xun Yu's passage is more than 200 words, three or four hundred words, in fact, in the previous description, everyone should feel that Xun Yu has more words, and the premise is that Chen Shou is a historian who cherishes words like gold.

In Guo Jia's biography and Pei Songzhi's related supplementary materials, except for the paragraph of "Ten Wins and Ten Defeats" in "Fu Zi", Guo Jia's words are basically no more than 100 words, and there are no more than 200 words at most, only the paragraph of "Ten Wins and Ten Defeats" is close to 500 words, which is very abrupt.

4. Fu Xuan, the author of "Fu Zi", is the earliest Guo Jia fan in history. This is very obvious in the relevant supplements of Guo Jiachuan and Xun Yuchuan Pei Songzhi, in Guo Jiachuan's supplements, "Fu Zi" appears as many as eight times, and its content can even be compared with the original text in "Three Kingdoms", which can be said to be good things for Guo Jia, and all the records are unclear about right and wrong are beneficial to Guo Jia, and the contradictions between "Three Kingdoms" and other historical materials are not only here. In the biography of Xun Yu, which is much longer than Guo Jia's biography, the supplement to "Fu Zi" only appears once, and it is not a comment on Xun Yu. The bias is obvious, which can be seen in general.

Due to the tendencies of Fu Xuan, the author of "Fu Zi", we need to look at the description and commentary of Guo Jia in "Fu Zi" dialectically.

To sum up, I personally think that the story of Guo Jia's "Ten Victories and Ten Defeats" in "Fu Zi" is adapted from the story of Xun Yu's "Four Victories" in history, which is apocryphalic and not true.

Note: I have already posted both articles in the work.