After the chapter on sawing Tayinbu was released, many readers in the comment section expressed different opinions, some clapped their hands quickly, and some questioned the inappropriate way to torture the enemy in this way. On the whole, I was a little surprised by the majority of people who disagreed, so I would like to share some of my views on this matter.

First of all, I want to say a word: If Jiashen could still use moderate means to deal with the Northeast Liao affairs and deal with the relationship between the two ethnic groups, then the Han nation and the Manchurian nation after Jiashen will be a life-and-death existence.

From 1644 onwards, everything that the Manchurians did in the Han people's eighteen provinces was extremely brutal and outrageous. We should keep this history in mind and see the blood and tears of our Han people from the words in the history books, not just a sentence.

All this is not something that can be erased by the word forgiveness.

Okay, let's get to the point, in order to best explain what I want to say, I will list one or two of readers' comments, and then say my opinion.

1. Ta Yinbu is a Tartar and an opponent of the Taiping Army, not the murderer of Chen Zizhuang, a scholar of Yongli Dongge University in the Southern Ming Dynasty, he is just a warrior, a warrior who fought to the end for his country and nation, so it is wrong to torture and kill him. The so-called injustice has the head and the debt is the master, whoever saws Chen Zizhuang should go to whom. Loyalty and courage are both valuable human qualities, and the torture of Tayinbu can only highlight the brutality and anger of the protagonist. The clothes of the Han family were not destroyed by the Tartars, it was the Han family that was destroyed. Look at the fact that it is now the second in the economic and military world, how many "Han family clothes" are left?

I agree with some aspects of this reader's message, and I also note that this reader friend is a subscriber to this book. So thank you in advance for the support of this reader. But just as people have the freedom to express their opinions, they can also have different opinions about things, so I would like to say a few words.

Truly. It was not Ta Yinbu who sawed Chen Zizhuang, but Tong Yangjia, a Manchurian, Xiucai sawed Ta Yinbu to avenge Chen Zizhuang It seems that he was looking for the wrong person, and his sawing behavior does have a brutal and aggressive side.

However, Chen Zizhuang is not a hero of my Han people, he is not Tong Yangjia's opponent, and he is not a warrior who fights to the end for his country and nation? Case. Why did Tong Yangjia brutally saw him to death?

The answer is obvious, in the eyes of the Manchurians, the Han people who dare to resist deserve to die. The worse the death, the better, they only need obedient Han people, they don't care about the loyalty and courage of the Han people, they only care about whether this Han people are willing to be their slaves.

Saw punishment was invented by Tong Yangjia, the governor of Liangguang in the Manchu Qing Dynasty. This is a compilation into the Han military flag. But in fact, it was a high-ranking official of the Qing court who was Manchu, and the old surname of Manchu was Tong Jia. He died relatively early, and Li Chengdong executed him shortly after anyway, along with more than 1,000 Han military banners. His brother is a child.

Since Tong Yangjia, a high-ranking Manchu official, can brutally sawed my Nanming minister Chen Zizhuang, then why can't Xiucai, who is a courtier of Nanming, use the same means to sawing and killing a Manchurian senator?

Could it be that the life of my Han people is not life, the heroes of the Han people are not heroes, the Han people do not admire being other people's opponents, they are not worthy of the respect of their opponents, and even if they die, they will be tortured to death. And the Manchurians are going to do everything the other way around?

Confucius said, repay virtue with virtue. Repay grievances directly!

Manchurians are not human beings, so why should we treat them as human beings? Anyone who condemns revenge with humanity forgets history and the suffering of our ancestors.

Double standards are unacceptable, especially since the protagonist lives in an era when Chinese civilization was about to fall into darkness, and in that era, Han Chinese were slaughtered every day.

In addition, please know that the Han family was not destroyed by the Han family itself, but by the Manchurians. Although the initiator of "shaving hair and making it easy to wear" was a Han scum, it was a Manchurian who adopted it and promoted it throughout the country, and at the same time killed tens of millions of Han people with butcher knives to completely exterminate the Han family, his name was Dorgon, and after his death, this order continued until the Qing Dynasty.

Today, the clothes of our Han family are rare, and they have withdrawn from people's daily life, and basically not many people know about it, but what is the reason for all this? It's because of that sensational species 300 years ago. Genocidal massacres!!

Do you want to keep your head or your hair!

Yangzhou 10th, Jiading 3th Massacre, Suzhou Massacre, Nanchang Massacre, Ganzhou Massacre, Jiangyin 81st Massacre, Changshu Massacre, Shazhen Massacre, Nanjing Massacre, Xugu Massacre, Wuxi Massacre, Kunshan Massacre, Jiaxing Massacre, Haining Massacre, Jinan Massacre, Jinhua Massacre, Xiamen Massacre, Chaozhou Massacre, Tong'an Massacre, Yuanjiang Massacre, Zhoushan Massacre, Xiangtan Massacre, Nanxiong Massacre, Jingxian Massacre, Datong Massacre, Hunyuan Massacre, Fenzhou Massacre, Taigu Massacre, Qinzhou Massacre, Zezhou Massacre, Shuozhou Massacre, Guangzhou Massacre, Sichuan Massacre

Second, the author's revenge methods are a bit excessive, not to mention whether there is really any Qing army sawing Chen Gong to kill, even if there is such a cruel act, how can it be committed by a modern man with a historical mission? Moreover, now the Manchus are also an important part of China's national structure, and a considerable part of the country's development also needs the strength of the Manchus.

For this reader, first of all, I want to say that the Qing army's sawing and killing of Chen Gong must be true, a historical fact, not a fiction. Then I would like to say that any Han Chinese who travels back to Xiucai's era has only one historical mission, and that is to lead the Han people to rebel against the brutal rule of the Manchurians, and to avenge the 20 million Han Chinese who died in the 165 well-documented large-scale massacres of the Qing army. Any mission other than this one is fake.

Again, this book is set in the 17th century, so the reader is not asked to associate the Manchus of that time with the Manchus of today, who are not necessarily the same people. I'm just an ordinary person who writes novels, and I don't have the ability to drive any ethnic relations, and I don't dare to wear this big hat, and I can't afford to wear it. Readers are also invited to speak rationally in the book review area.

Please also ask the two readers who have been excerpted by me to leave a message not to think that I am targeting you, but your message can roughly replace other people's messages, so I will pick it up.

I'm sorry, I've tried my best to shorten what I want to say, but it's still more than 1,000 words, which is enough to meet the charging standard, so that readers have to pay a few cents to read what I wrote that has nothing to do with the plot of the work, for which I will compensate you for publishing a few hundred more free content in the next few chapters (e.g. 3,000 words for 3,415 words)

Later updates are released around eleven o'clock, and there may only be one update today. (To be continued.) )