readx; After World War I, Western capital began to look eastward and swept back into Asia, but Asia at this time was no longer the Asia it was before World War I. Pen "Fun" Pavilion www.biquge.info

Western countries have discovered that China has not only achieved military hegemony in Asia, but has also penetrated almost all parts of Asia economically.

As far as Britain is concerned, China -- a huge profitable market in Britain -- is completely inaccessible at this time.

And what makes them even more depressed is that even the colonies and dominions are full of Chinese capital, such as Malaysia, India, Australia and other places, Chinese capital has begun to take root.

And most importantly, the British political axe is not good enough to deal with these Chinese capital, after all, these colonies are too close to China.

There is an agreement between China and the UK, and if the UK breaks the agreement, then China may resort to military means, which will lead to war.

To go to war with China in Asia is basically looking for abuse!

Especially in Australia, the problem of the Chinese has become the most headache for Australia's political axe, and even the British are not able to solve this problem at this time.

At this time, there are more than 3 million Chinese in Australia, which is about to account for one-third of Australia's population, which means that there is one Chinese in nearly three people.

These Chinese are well-organized and disciplined. And a lot of whites are divided, basically more than sixty percent of whites are divided.

And the number of groups that are being divided is increasing.

Chinese officials began to appear in Australia on a large scale because the time for elections had come.

This is a peaceful invasion, or rather, boiling a frog in warm water, for which it has received good results.

The British political axe and the Australian political axe only had a headache at this time, but there was no way to deal with these Chinese.

Once any policy against the Chinese is introduced, it will immediately cause a huge demonstration, protest, and even violence in Australia.

And it was accompanied by intimidation, kidnapping, assassination, etc.

It made the Australian political axe officials tremble one by one.

These Chinese were so united at this time that it was almost impossible to start.

Moreover, China has expanded into Indonesia and can threaten Australia at any time, and China's political axe has always helped Australia, just like during the American flu, it has won the favor of the Australian people.

In the face of protests, Australia's political axe can only be defeated, and if violent means are used to suppress it, then the fate of the Dutch is a good example.

This is also the place where Australian political axes are most feared.

However, the longer it drags on, the deeper it sinks.

It is getting harder and harder to get rid of the Chinese control of Australia.

Especially after the Chinese controlled Australian public opinion, it can be said that they are stubbornly defending the position of public opinion. After the war, the Australian political axe began to try to take back public opinion, but it was met with massive opposition and could only be declared defeated.

Firmly grasp public opinion, the Chinese will be able to better divide the whites, if the initiative of public opinion is taken away, then the Chinese in Australia will be very passive.

In Asia, Britain faces aggressive Chinese capital and finds itself no longer competitive. Financially speaking, the UK's international credit and insurance businesses are struggling to compete with the rising Asian dollar at this time.

In terms of manufacturing, Britain can't catch up with China's footsteps at this time.

Asia is China's Asia.

Order has also gradually been controlled by China.

China's most important diplomatic concern is the policies of various countries towards Chinese capital, especially towards the United Kingdom, which has been stipulated in the "Sino-British Agreement on the Division of Power" signed by the two sides, and the United Kingdom is now very passive.

If a policy against the Chinese is introduced, it will be tantamount to tearing up this agreement.

Now Britain felt that even the commercial competition within the colonies was struggling, and this was a result that was very difficult for the British to accept.

In Siam, Chinese capital is developing rapidly.

China began to focus on promoting national liberalism and benevolence and friendship to Siam, and the Siamese Bangkok dynasty was increasingly dissatisfied with Britain and France.

In Siam's view, China is very friendly and will not bully Siam, but Britain and France are different, this is bullying Siam, which is tantamount to trampling on the dignity of Siamese rulers.

For the ruler, it is perfectly okay to share a part of the benefits to others as a last resort.

The rise of China made Siam see an opportunity to get rid of the oppression of Britain and France, so that there was no need to give benefits to Britain and France, and it was able to allow the rulers of the dynasty to have more benefits.

In the face of Siam, which was becoming more and more disobedient, Britain and France did not have much to do.

After all, Siam was very close to China at this time, and it was a thing of the past for Britain and France to wantonly bully Siam again.

In the face of the growing revenge of the Bangkok dynasty, the British and French tried to communicate with the Bangkok dynasty, but it was not very effective.

The formation of the Bangkok Dynasty introduced a number of policies that favored Chinese capital, as well as policies to suppress British and French capital, which led to the rapid development of Chinese capital in Siam.

The external competitiveness of Chinese capital itself is relatively strong, and with the advantage of policies, it will naturally be even more fierce.

Basically, the situation in the whole of Asia, except for one country, is mostly controlled or infiltrated by China.

In Africa, however, Chinese capital has not yet entered on a large scale. And in Europe, the main ones are Serbia and Turkey, which are relatively close to China, and nothing else.

The situation in South America is even more bizarre, and China has started to sell arms to South America on a large scale, especially to Brazil.

At this time, Brazil and China were very close, because China gave Brazil a lot of convenience to maintain its rule.

For example, it has provided Brazil with agricultural technology, and has also provided some aid to Brazil in terms of grain, and has also provided Brazil with help in building nationalism and building up its army.

What the United States can provide, China can basically provide, and what China can provide is not what the United States can provide, such as one of the most important aspects of agricultural technology.

If Brazil doesn't get along with China, the result will be a recession, and Brazil is a traditional agricultural exporter, and if Brazil can't do something about agricultural exports, then the economy will be hit hard.

If it gets closer to China, then Brazil can get strong agricultural technical support, as well as a lot of military guidance.

At the very least, China has offered Brazil a path that would not be dangerous even if it offended the United States. Although the United States is very close to Brazil, if Brazil can revive nationalism, there is nothing the United States can do with Brazil.

However, Brazil, a country known as a melting pot of races, has a very mixed race, and nationalism is not very easy to handle, so it can only engage in nationalism, which is also a kind of nationalism in disguise.

Countries such as Chile, Peru, and Uruguay are all beginning to get very close to China at this time.

China began to provide military guidance to these countries on a large scale, as well as arms sales, and at the same time actively provided them with food aid, and so on.

At this time, China is all over the world to carry out food aid, and if there is nothing else, will there be any food?

For those backward countries, food is the most important thing, and by being able to provide food aid to these countries, China is helping their rulers to consolidate their ability to rule.

Therefore, these backward countries are actively moving closer to China.

In South America in particular, a number of countries have been divided by China.

The United States also protested, but so did China.

As the United States began to unilaterally tear up the agreement, the relationship between the two sides began to deteriorate, and China was determined to disrupt this backyard of the United States.

And in Africa, China's policy is also obvious, which is to smuggle large quantities of arms into Africa, even free of charge.

These arms were smuggled into Africa, and black Africans began to arm themselves against the European colonial powers, actively supporting the African national reading movement.

Of course, China will not act in a public capacity, but let those security companies carry out such activities. These security companies are growing rapidly, and China has sent tens of thousands of mercenaries to other countries in the name of several security companies.

These mercenaries are a very powerful thug, and any backward country that invites these mercenaries will soon be able to change its military strength.

China's security companies are only private in name, but in fact state, everyone knows this, it is just a matter of the rules of the game.

At this time, the capital structure of the world is basically that most of Asia belongs to the sphere of influence of Chinese capital, while the United States takes the United States mainland and some European countries as its sphere of influence. At the same time, the United States has also entered Africa, and South America belongs to the backyard of the United States, and it still maintains a state of suppression of Chinese capital for the time being.

But the situation in South America is increasingly unfavorable for the United States.

The capital of Britain and France, on the other hand, has not weakened much after being tossed by the war for several years, because the war will not cause their wealth to be lost, but will concentrate the wealth of the country and its people in them.

But the weakening of the state is an indisputable fact.

The weakness of the country means that it is difficult for capital to compete outside.

In terms of capital, it can be divided into two camps or five camps.

The two camps are China in the East, and the capital of Europe and the United States.

The five camps can be divided into China, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.

In addition to the strength of the capital of these countries, the capital of other countries is very weak, and countries like Ben and Italy are not very good on the table.

The German capitalists did not suffer much loss, but instead made a fortune and strengthened their monopoly as a result of the war.

Among them, the strongest capital is China and the United States.

The capital of the United States and Western countries is entangled with each other, and basically all countries have American capital. But like Britain, France and Germany, they still have their own national capital.

It was only after the war that according to the agreement of the Paris Peace Conference, the United States broke through the restrictions on capital entry in many places.

In terms of the distribution of wealth in the world, the wealth of the capital distribution areas of the United States is much more than that of the capital distribution areas of China.

At this time, China is vigorously opening up new capital markets.

The Asian region is basically the same, and there is nothing too much to change about the capital flow environment. Africa is still in a colonial state, and the market is not saying that China can do whatever it wants.

Therefore, the region where China can continue to expand internationally is South America.

There are many small countries in South America, and the resources are still relatively rich, and the population is also okay.

In terms of foreign competition, Chinese capital has a great technological advantage, and basically under the same policy environment, American capital cannot compete with Chinese capital in many industries.

The political and military competition between China and the United States in South America actually involves a competition of strategy and capital.

However, the core and fundamental problem is capital competition.

To a large extent, the deterioration of Sino-US relations is also caused by the competition of capital.

China is developing too fast, and the impact on the United States is too great. Suddenly, with such a violent impact, the monopoly capitalists in the United States naturally had a sense of crisis.

At this time, Chinese capital is making great strides and investing heavily in South America, and although the situation in South America is gradually divided into two camps, China and the United States, it is still very safe to invest in those pro-China countries.

At the very least, even if the fight broke out, those small countries would not dare to seize German capital as they did with German capital until they saw a clear trend.

U.S. capital in Asia is competing with Chinese capital in a very sluggish manner.

Generally speaking, it is time for China to be able to equal the United States in terms of capital competition, and China has formed its own world system and its own institutional path, as well as ideology, external packaging, etc., and it is already not listening to the Yankees' fools.

Instead, they use their own set to fool other countries.

This has created an ideological conflict, the United States is about freedom, and China is about freedom, but it is national freedom.

In this ideological conflict, China's national freedom has a great advantage.

The freedom of the United States is detrimental to the interests of the rulers, especially those who are literate. China's national freedom is carried out on the premise of not harming the interests of the scholars and rulers, and at the same time, even if it is a non-scholarly country, the idea of national freedom can be used.

There is a big difference between national freedom and open-boiled freedom.

For example, in later France, there was a boiled route, but not a free route.

And in the future, China will also take the open-boiled route, but not the people's freedom route.

National freedom, on the other hand, is something that every nation can take, and it is indeed true for the nation itself.

The United States uses Mingzhuo freedom to fool the world, while China comes up with a slogan that is not too foolish, but beneficial to itself, to counter the American Mingzhuo freedom slogan.

Therefore, since China put forward the slogan of national freedom, it has quickly gained a large market.

At this time, the main ideological competition in the world was three, one was the freedom of the American boil, one was the national freedom of China, and the other was the Soviet Union's [***].

Of the three, only China's national freedom is the most reliable.

Many of the starting points may be good, just like the later generations of China, the starting point of the founding of the country was good, but it was too idealistic, and lacked the ability to actually work, so in the end it could not be supported, the era of the Cultural Revolution, which meant that the bureaucracy came to power, and since then it has entered a bureaucratic era.

In the era of bureaucracy, there is no way to read talents, which leads to the fact that the internal freedom is actually very large, that is, the freedom of the bureaucracy is very large, and when the freedom of the bureaucracy is great, the internal friction is serious, and it is impossible to develop into a more intelligent way of governance.

The freedom of the United States is completely deceitful, and the United States spreads the freedom of the boil by itself as a model, that is, a model of the results of economic development.

And this is beneficial for the United States and not for other countries.

Only China's policy of national freedom is more reliable, and China has a very clever way of ruling internally, but there is also a certain idealism mixed in.

The most clever way of ruling is actually the kind that is said to be the original.

If you think about it in the mode of a ruler, it is natural that the way of ruling is the most clever, and he adopts nationalism and exploits the people in the same way. The whole country has a talent for reading, and it will move in one direction.

In China, Xia Jun himself was born into the common people, so he did not have too many rulers' surnames, so he had a certain idealism. This idealism can be seen in many of China's founders, such as Zhu Yuanzhang in the Ming Dynasty, and later [***].

This new ruler is not a qualified ruler, because there is idealism in it.

Or rather, this is a conscientious ruler who will really think about the people. In a country like Samoto, the emperor does not think about the people, and reforming is just a more intelligent way of governing.

The wise way to rule is development and internal stability.

After being broken and the policy of closing the country to the outside world was broken, they found that their policy was wrong, so they also learned from the crazy development of Westerners, so that they could not be oppressed by the outside world. After the frenzied development, the productive forces increased, and although they were still exploitative, the people's life became better.

At the same time, this kind of clever rule is to establish an orderly order in the country, and not to allow the bureaucracy to oppress the people at will.

Limit the interests of the bureaucracy to a certain range.

At this time, China limited the interests of the bureaucracy to a small area, and gave the interests of the people to maintain its rule. It's also a clever tool, but why isn't it the most brilliant? It's because the exploitation isn't enough.

If China increases its exploitation at this time, it will soon be able to reap very large benefits, after all, the economy has already begun to develop.

Manpower and material resources have become stronger.

But it is precisely because China has adopted this model that the market for the slogan of national freedom in China is very large.

Because China is a successful model of national freedom.

If other countries want to save their country, they can refer to the model of China, the United States and the Soviet Union, and China has changed the most, and the Soviet Union was beaten badly by China.

The United States is pure deception, and China has already made clear the essence of freedom in the open boil.

Therefore, for the backward countries and colonized countries in the world, if they want to have a way out, China's idea of national freedom and China's development model should be preferred.

But there are also conflicts.

In particular, China's idea of national freedom and the idea of [***] are in serious conflict within the territory of those backward countries.

Because the two ideologies were not the same, the rulers adopted the Chinese idea of national freedom, while the careerists adopted the ideas of the proletarian revolution in a vain attempt to become the new rulers.

The proletarian revolution can indeed make a group of ordinary people rulers, this is a new form of rebellion, and the success of the Soviet Union has provided a great exemplary role for world careerists.

After all, the way in which the East China political axe, the predecessor of the Chinese Empire, seized the ruling power, was not something that every country could imitate, and this was a model that required extremely high technical surnames.

To put it bluntly, the threshold is too high, and they just don't have such capabilities.

The threshold for the proletarian revolution is very low, and as long as there are violent internal contradictions, there is a great chance of success.

In other words, the freedom of the United States is also for careerists, or more precisely, for businessmen and careerists from all over the world.

Only China's idea of national freedom is prepared for the rulers in power, so it is natural that China's idea of national freedom has the broadest market.

And the rulers who adopt the idea of national freedom will be challenged by the Mingchu and proletarians.

Capital, ideas, and institutions make up today's complex world, which is even more complex than the original history, because China emerged.

It's complex, but it's also orderly, and it's also clear.

(To be continued)