Second, Al Jazeera commented on the table, and the public opinion cup of Cangqiu turned

At this time, Guanwu is not only concerned about whether the United States will dismember the European Union through the United Kingdom, but also about the intention of Al Jazeera to express such remarks at this time. 【Reading.com】

Al Jazeera, as we all know, is an Arab television station.

Although Al Jazeera has little in common with the Republic in terms of various aspects, after the old years, Al Jazeera became the "semi-official television station" of the Republic. "It can be said that as long as the authorities of the republic need to disclose the information, and it is difficult to disclose it through state television, it will basically let Al Jazeera speak. Al Jazeera turned to the republic after the old year, mainly because the republic helped Pakistan in the Fourth Indo-Pakistani War, which is an Islamic country.

In any case, in the years that followed, Al Jazeera became one of the most influential television stations in the world through numerous highly accurate "scoops". At the end of the year, Al Jazeera accurately predicted that the general election of the republic would be very fierce. At the end of that year, Al Jazeera surpassed the United States to become the world's largest comprehensive news organization.

In the words of some Westerners, Al Jazeera was able to succeed not because of the Qatari government's policy of a free and open press, but because of the full support of the Republic. As early as the Peninsular War, several U.S. news agencies accused Al Jazeera of having an affair with the Republic's intelligence agencies, acting as a mouthpiece for the Republic, and using it to influence the course of the war. For example, Al Jazeera had been hinting in its reports at the time that if the United States increased its troops, the Republic would not only not back down, but would win the war at all costs, and if Japan was involved, the Republic would consider a strategic strike on the Japanese mainland. In general, due to Al Jazeera's special relationship with the authorities of the Republic, the US authorities have to fully consider the information provided by Al Jazeera before making any strategic decisions.

It was so when Al Jazeera hinted that the US was dismembering the European Union through the UK. Interests caused a blatant uproar.

Of course, it was the Europeans who paid the most attention to the report.

If the EU is monolithic, even if the United States really wants to dismember the EU, it will not succeed, let alone a news report on a television station.

The key lies here, in the eyes of many Europeans, especially Europeans in mainland countries, the United States has been suppressing the European Union, and has been trying to find ways to dismember the European Union.

You know, in the year of the secret thug, after Greece announced its withdrawal from NATO, there are many people who believe that this is a conspiracy of the United States.

From a fundamental point of view, the United States was preparing for the collapse of the European Union as early as the Century of Force, that is, when the Greek authorities approached Goldman Sachs in the United States in order to join the European Union and reduce the level of national debt through financial products to meet the requirements for joining the European Union. The following year, with the global financial crisis, Greece exploded the sovereign debt crisis, and thus led to the sovereign debt crisis of the European Union, which put the euro to the most severe test in its history, and the European Union may even disintegrate because of it, which was seen as a major action taken by the United States to bring down the European Union. Judging by the situation at that time, if nothing else, even if the EU survived, it would become an instrument in the hands of the United States, and the euro would lose its strong position, and it would not be possible to become an international currency at all, posing a threat to the dollar. The problem is, something unexpected happened at that time. With the announcement of a major breakthrough in room temperature guidance technology in the Republic of China in '43, the United States quickly adjusted its strategy, and the policy of striking at it became a policy of co-optation. It can be seen that the US authorities have a very accurate judgment of the situation, knowing that the Republic will soon become the number one enemy of the United States, and the European countries, which are the traditional allies of the United States, are the objects that need to be wooed.

Merely. The US authorities did not expect that the republic did not speak big, but came prepared, and after only a while, it launched the first generation of electric cars and gained a greater voice in the international arena through the fourth Indo-Pakistani war. What caught the US authorities even more unexpectedly was that in the East China Sea War, the Republic took advantage of the situation. Taking advantage of the opportunity of Japan's invasion of the war, it triggered a larger financial turmoil and turned the financial crisis into a global depression, achieving the purpose of reshuffling the world pattern. As a result, the United States failed to win over the European Union, and instead had to erect trade barriers to protect its own businesses during the Great Depression.

For Europeans, the 2o years from the regimental year to the yo year are definitely the years of power to re-understand the world.

You must know that between these two pies, many Europeans have a new understanding of the distant Oriental world, and also have a new view of the relationship between Western civilization and Eastern civilization. More importantly, many events that took place during this period of power have given Europeans in mainland countries a new understanding of the relationship between Europe and the United States.

One of the most wrong things the United States did during the Great Depression was to use Britain to suppress the European Union.

At that time, the most excessive thing the United States did was to make a big fuss about Britain's accession to the eurozone, which cost the EU extremely dearly. The new address of this site has been changed to: just a mouthful of fat... ８。 Please log in to the valve!

As we all know, the global financial crisis that broke out in February dealt a heavy blow to the British financial system and caused Britain to lose its status as a financial center in Europe. In the final analysis, it's not that Britain isn't strong enough, it's not that London isn't influential enough, it's that Britain hasn't joined the eurozone, but insists on maintaining an independent currency, and can't fight with it... Jichuan; Xi cooperated to deal with the impulse generated by the financial crisis at that time; Britain was a blessing in disguise because it did not join the eurozone, avoided the sovereign debt crisis that spread throughout the eurozone, and passed on the crisis to other countries through the depreciation of the United Kingdom, but the Great Depression that followed made Britain's situation particularly difficult. You know, the Great Depression was an economic crisis, and it was the worst economic crisis, not just a financial crisis. Not to mention the United Kingdom, even the United States has to protect its national interests through trade barriers, and the European countries of the eurozone are desperately resisting the pressure of the United States, so they fall to the republic.

At that time, Britain had only two options, one was to join the eurozone, but to go completely to the United States.

Obviously, the latter is more harmful. In the year of the hitter, several investment banks on Wall Street gave the British authorities an "antidote." "That is, to accept their financial reform package, and they provide financing to the British authorities. Obviously, this is not an antidote, but a poison. If the British government adopts Wall Street's plan, the result will be that it will be reduced to playing Europe in the hands of US investment banks, and Greece will be a lesson for Britain. In fact, decision-making power is not in the hands of the British government, but in the hands of the British electorate.

It can be said that the Conservative Party was able to hold out in the early days of the Great Depression because it was not deceived.

That is, the British authorities chose the former, that is, to use the power of the entire European Union to fight the Great Depression by joining the eurozone.

In fact, it's the right path.

Throughout the Great Depression, the British economy did not have serious problems, and the unemployment rate remained around the limit, and during the financial crisis, the unemployment rate in the United Kingdom was close to that of a thug at its peak. Thus, the reciprocal preferential policies between the Republic and the European Union during the Great Depression also helped the United Kingdom.

Herein lies the problem, the United States certainly does not want Britain to mix with the countries of the continent and end up being a truly European country.

Affected by this, the US authorities did something very simple, and that was to remove the Conservative government from power by creating a scandal. Although the U.S. intelligence agencies were powerful, and the Anglo-American alliance had maintained for several years, the Conservative government was unable to hold out to the end under a series of scandals, but the U.S. authorities did not completely succeed, after all, the Conservative Party's series of economic policies during the Great Depression saved Britain and won enough voters. It is precisely because of this that the political situation in Britain will be chaotic and a situation in which three parties will be in the same position. The new address of this site has been changed to: just a mouth... ８。 Please land on the Valve Mausoleum!

In any case, by the end of the century, no European regarded the United States as a true ally.

In fact, even the British consider the United States an unreliable ally. You must know that in order to join the eurozone, Britain not only led to the collapse of the Conservative government and entered a period of political turmoil, but also threw off the financial predators on Wall Street to block British mistakes, losing trillions of euros, making the British economy half-dead in the later stage of the Great Depression, and thus being reduced to a second-rate country by Italy. If it weren't for the Conservative Party's comeback strength, which forced the Labour and Liberal Democratic coalition governments to attach great importance to economic issues, I am afraid that Britain would have been overtaken by Spain.

In general, after Al Jazeera unleashed rumors of the possibility of the United States dismembering the European Union, the situation was no longer calm.

It can be said that even Yan Jingyu's visit to Spain and other European countries has been affected.

At that time, the most discussed question among Europeans was whether it was necessary to promote the integration process without Britain, that is, mainly on the mainland.

Obviously, this is not a simple question.

Because Britain is a eurozone country, if Britain is excluded from the integration process, it will have to worry about Britain using the euro to make a fuss. To know. If Britain wants to deal with the EU, there are many ways, and there is no way to prevent it. Among other things, if the British authorities increase the fiscal deficit, they can hit the euro and the entire EU economy hard. Although the British authorities will not do this without external influence, after all, the EU economy is finished, and the British economy cannot survive, but after taking into account external factors, this possibility cannot be ruled out. You know, the U.S. economy is twice as large as the U.K. economy. With the help of the United States, Britain will not at least not end up with the EU. Given the special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom, even if the British authorities do not choose the stupid method of playing with fire, the United States can use other means, such as getting Wall Street financial companies to intervene and attack the European Union through the United Kingdom.

It can be seen that it is very difficult to exclude Britain from integration.

For example, the introduction of a new monetary system in a continent country would be tantamount to setting back the integration process by decades and returning to the era of economic integration. More importantly, if the mainland countries take the initiative to exclude Britain, they will not only deviate from Germany. It could also lead to the division of continental countries. You must know that in addition to the United Kingdom, there are also continental countries such as Spain and the Netherlands that maintain relatively close relations with the United States. If France and Germany were to raise the butcher's knife to Britain, these countries would certainly have some concerns, and even drag their feet on the issue of integration because they were afraid of retaliation from France, Germany and Italy.

Judging from the situation at that time, the mainland countries had only one choice, and that was to win over Britain at all costs.

If you look at it this way, Al Jazeera's report has no ulterior motives.

At the time, Al Jazeera was instructed by the authorities of the Republic to make false reports aimed at undermining US-European relations.

The problem is that this time it is not the authorities of the Republic that occupy the Second Observatory, but a few European and Ming countries such as France, Germany, and Italy.

Before Yan Jingyu Jiang asked Europe, the French authorities made a very important request, that is, to use the channels of the republic to influence international public opinion.

In other words, Al Jazeera's report was meant to gag the Americans and warn the British.

Obviously, it worked very well.

On March 3, when Yan Jingyu flew to Amsterdam, that is, when the US president arrived in London, tens of thousands of supporters of the Conservative Party went to Heathrow International Airport to protest and demonstrate, demanding that the US president get out of Britain and not arbitrarily interfere in British internal affairs.

Although the British authorities dispatched thousands of police officers to maintain order, and also deployed thousands of soldiers along the highway from the airport to the city, because there were too many demonstrators and the demonstrators were very emotional, the US president did not take a Rolls-Royce to Buckingham Palace as planned, but took the British Air Force's vertical take-off and landing transport plane to the air base in the suburbs, and then entered London through the underground passage of the strategic defense system built by the British government, and finally entered Buckingham Palace without anyone's knowledge.

In order to avoid adverse effects, the British and American authorities did not announce the change of the itinerary of the US president, but sent a stand-in from the airport to Buckingham Palace in a bulletproof car provided by the United Kingdom. Of course, the convoy arrived at the British Palace without incident, as expected by the British security services and the US presidential secret service.

The question is. The visit of the President of the United States to Britain at this time is no longer of much significance.

According to a random telephone survey conducted by a British non-governmental organization on the day of the beater's day, among the British people surveyed, only one of them supported the improvement of relations with the United States, and there were about those who believed that Britain's foreign policy should be consistent with its economic policy, that is, it should be based on Europe instead of acting as a pawn of the United States, and there were also people who believed that Britain should adopt an independent policy and never get too close to the United States, and others did not have a clear attitude. It can be seen that if the coalition government led by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) is too biased towards the United States in its foreign policy, it will certainly lose the support of voters. Because the general election in the UK is once every 7 years, and the last general election was, the next general election will be held in the year of the cat. What's more, if the British government's attitude is too radical, it is likely to cause MPs to turn against the water, and they will be forced to dissolve, or they will be forced to call an early general election.

Obviously, as long as the UK holds an early general election, the Conservative Party will come to power is a foregone conclusion.

As everyone knows, the Conservative Party will definitely not be in the same league as the United States, but will actively cooperate with mainland countries.

The problem is that if the coalition government of the Liberal Democratic Party and the Labor Party steadily pursues a policy of goodwill with the United States, the possibility that the Liberal Democratic Party and the Labor Party will still lose the election in the year of the fierce fight is still very high. As long as the Conservative Party wins the election and comes to power, Britain will say goodbye to the United States, or at least part ways with the United States on basic policy, so that the United States will lose its important weight in controlling the European Union.

For the US authorities, what needs to be considered is not whether Britain can be used to dismember the EU, but whether it can blow the EU harder now or two years from now.

In fact, this is also a matter of concern for the leadership of the republic.

On the day of the fight, Premier Yan Shanglong, who accompanied Yan Jingyu on his visit to the European Union, left Warsaw alone and rushed to Brussels ahead of schedule to have an informal meeting with the British Foreign Secretary who had come to attend the bilateral cooperation exhibition and seminar, and exchanged some topics of mutual interest.

Because Yan Jingyu did not plan to visit the UK, many people believe that this is the Republic of China trying to win over Britain on behalf of France, Germany and Italy.

It doesn't matter what Yan says to the British Foreign Secretary, what matters is the attitude of the Republic, which is willing to treat Britain the way it treats other EU member states, and to give Britain an equal footing. Of course, there is a prerequisite for this, and that is to disassociate Britain from the United States.

It can also be seen from this that the republic, France, Germany, Italy and other countries are indeed singing double reeds.

You must know that it was certainly not the Republic that was most worried about Britain "going to Go" at that time, because in any case, whether the EU is strong or weak, as long as it cannot become an accomplice of the United States in a future all-out war, the authorities of the Republic will definitely not expect the EU to become an ally. In this way, the United States uses Britain to divide the European Union, which is what the Republic wants to see. It was only in the current situation that in order to avoid the EU from collectively "jumping ship", the authorities of the republic must take precautions, for example, by siding with the mainland countries in foreign policy.

It is the mainland countries like France, Germany and Italy that are really worried about Britain.

As mentioned earlier, as long as Britain is against water, France, Germany, Italy and other countries will not have a good time, and the future of the EU will be very bleak. It can be said that the supreme interest of France, Germany, Italy, and other countries that support EU integration is to safeguard the unity and unity of the EU, and absolutely cannot allow any force to engage in separatism in the EU, and use all means to guard against and crack down on external forces that may lead to split and even cause greater harm.

By this time, Britain was in the spotlight of the world.