readx;

On the issue of forcible offenses

First, Lao Mu wants to apologize. Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 info

When writing about Qiao Qiaoer's age, I didn't take into account that a year had passed. - In chapter 25o, Qiao Qiao'er's second appearance was in the spring of the second year of Zhenguan, and the book sets her as "fourteen or fifteen years old" at that time, and the time when she married Zuo Shaoyang was the spring of the third year of Zhenguan, and a whole year has passed, so Qiao Qiaoer should be "fifteen or sixteen" years old. Lao Mu has already corrected the age error in the book.

Secondly, according to the marriage age of the Tang Dynasty, Zuo Shaoyang did not break the law.

Some book friends say that Zuo Shaoyang is guilty, and these book friends may not have a comprehensive understanding of history and modern legal knowledge. -- As we all know, the marriage age in the Tang Dynasty was very low, and the Tang Dynasty law stipulated that "men should be fifteen and women thirteen should be married", and the eldest grandson of the Tang Dynasty was only thirteen years old when she married Li Shimin, Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, and the emperor could marry a thirteen-year-old woman, and of course Zuo Shaoyang could also marry a fourteen-year-old Qiao Qiao'er. For another example, Empress Xiao, who is a beautiful lady of the country and the city, was only nine years old when she married Yang Guang, the emperor of the Sui Dynasty, so according to the laws of the Tang Dynasty, the protagonist did not break the law.

Third, according to modern criminal law, Zuo Shaoyang did not commit a crime.

Some book friends will say that the protagonist is a modern time through the past, he is educated in modern law, and he should know that he can't follow it, I agree with this point of view with both hands, but, please ask these book friends to flip through the provisions of China's criminal law, the second paragraph of Article 236 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates: "If Jianyin is under the age of 14, he will be punished heavily." In other words, the current criminal law stipulates that the object of the crime of Jianyi must be under the age of 14.

Not to mention that Qiao Qiaoer's age was written wrongly, it should be fifteen or sixteen years old, even if it was only the fourteen years old who was originally wrongly written, and moved her to modern society, it is not **, even if these book friends raise money to send a group of police officers to travel back in time to arrest Zuo Shaoyang, according to the current criminal law, there is no way to investigate his criminal responsibility for the crime? Because Qiao Qiaoer is already fourteen years old

Of course, writing should consider the reader's feelings, after all, the reader is a person with modern education, but writing at the age of fourteen feels too much, so how old is it appropriate to write? Fifteen years old? Sixteen years old? Seventeen? Lao Mu was a little dazed. Because since the age of marriage stipulated in China's current marriage law is 20 years old for women, according to the views of these righteous scholars, it should be understood that those who are under the age of 20 are not in accordance with the law and morality.

In the end, Lao Mu reflected again and again, at that time, he should have written that our protagonist was upright and awe-inspiring in the night of the candle in the cave room, and he categorically refused to say hello to Qiao Qiaoer, and from then on, he sat in danger, watched "Spring and Autumn" with the lamp every night, watched him for six years, and waited for Qiao Qiaoer to reach the age of twenty, and then had a round room with Qiao Qiaoer at that time.

However, in this way, the law and morality are passable, but I am afraid that some book friends will come out and froth at the mouth and scold Lao Mu for being pedantic.

What should I do?

Alas, it is difficult to write through to tell the truth