ps: Hanfeng's new book "I Want to Be a Ball Captain" has been released, and it urgently needs the continued support of the brothers.

Time is gradually approaching the new millennium, but no one in the East and the West has forgotten the war of that year. The governments of Eastern and Western countries also know that there is no better way to mobilize the patriotic passion of the people than a war movie.

Traditional literature has declined, just like the traditional media represented by newspapers, in today's developed film and television, in the new era of the advent of the Internet age, traditional literature, as a relatively pure literature, serious literature, elite literature, and even fashion literature, documentary literature, popular literature, popular literature, etc., has already given up its first position to film and television.

Many people can spend dozens of yuan to go to the cinema to watch a movie they like or don't like, but not too many people spend dozens of yuan to buy a good book in a bookstore.

In the fifties and sixties, when China's annual bestseller list was measured in millions of copies, and almost all of the top 20 in the midterm sold more than 10 million copies, it was the golden age of literary works.

But now? China's population has reached 500 million, more than 70 million people back then, people have become richer, more affluent, and the ways to buy books are more diverse and convenient. Almost tenfold shrinkage.

Now, if a book can sell more than a million copies a year, it's almost certain that the book will be in the top 10 on the annual bestseller list. In the film and television sector, the weight of the industrial economy is dozens of times that of the fifties and sixties. The rise and fall of the two directly reflects who is the first industry with world influence.

Therefore, China's domestic TV series related to the Gaozu era. Since the TV industry has grown, it has never been cut off. It is the most trustworthy signboard in China's TV industry, ensuring income in drought and flood. No matter how ugly you shoot, you can get it back. If Liu Siam is resurrected. His first reaction to this must be -, Lao Tzu is going to fight against the Japanese drama!

In the film industry, just like the rabbits in the previous life, the country invested in the Armageddon and a series of large-scale war movies, the current China, whether it is the government or the royal family, will spend a lot of money to shoot one or two such war films every year, in order to miss the eventful years of the year and remember the founding heroes of the year.

Those special actors in the film. Compared with his peers in the original time and space, he is a hundred times more comfortable.

And so on, in Western countries, in the Nordic countries, in the Red League, in the Arab League, in the Indian Union, such films have never been broken.

The Russians remember their heroic war, and the Poles remember the hard road they took to restore their country. Whether it is St. Petersburg or all the members of the Red League, everyone has a handful of bitter tears of his own.

The same is true of the Arab League, which guides the people's patriotic enthusiasm by remembering the war, and the governments of the Arab League are not stupid. But it's a pity. Under the influence of religious forces, the films of the Arab League are really ...... Not so much to the taste of the world. Their influence is not even as good as that of the Indian League. The three also dare to open their brains in the movie, and wantonly YY their own heroes. Sow some dog blood, and from time to time you can make one or two high-quality products. The movies made by the Arab League can only be enjoyed by themselves.

It's really about high-quality movies. Even the art of cinema, which is comparable to that of China, has to be seen in Moscow and the countries of Western Europe. Britain, France, Germany, and Italy, who did not re-follow the literary and artistic route of their previous lives, plus the Americans, who should have been a wonder in the history of film, exerted a power that is not much inferior to China.

Of course, over the years, Chinese films have always held the position of the world's leader, because China is the only superpower on the planet.

Movies are always closely related to the market and money.

Red Moscow will not glorify the glory of the Russians in the Tsarist era, just as the old and strong Britain will not preach positively the righteousness of the war in which the Chinese took their crown from the three world wars.

But since the 80s, the British have been surprised to find that their anti-China films can also sell well at the box office in China. Of course, that's not all, it's just a very few, and many of those movies don't pass the censorship in China. But as long as the trial is passed, the British can make a small fortune, which also surprises the British.

You must know that there is no Chinese film of the same kind in the UK market at all, even if it can be released in the UK. Over time, such Chinese films were no longer shown in Western countries.

Then there is this year's British-filmed "The Lost Crown", a British-produced film that was generous in the Chinese film market in 1990, and its film ranked sixth in the year-end box office charts, and during the screening period, it won the first place in the Chinese box office charts twice, and won the championship for a month, shocking the whole world.

This achievement, whether it is a British filmmaker or a Chinese filmmaker, did not expect.

The Chinese side was shocked, and the media and film companies launched investigations, but the results were somewhat ironic.

The audience said: First of all, the movie "The Lost Crown" is really good, and the actors' acting skills are impeccable; Second, the storyline of the movie is very powerful. The main plot of the movie "The Lost Crown" is the Second East-West War, Britain lost successive wars, and had to secretly reach an armistice agreement with China, signed an agreement to make the British Empire lose Australia and India, and lost the crown of the empire on which the sun never sets. In the film, a series of verbal exchanges between Chinese and British diplomats, and the aggressive and invincible posture of the Chinese side, if they fall in the eyes of Westerners, they will inevitably swell with anger against China, but the same picture falls in the eyes of Chinese audiences, but it is an alternative stimulus.

-- It's like being a bully.

In audience surveys, many young Chinese said they experienced a unique thrill from the British film-the domineering of the Chinese side.

"What kind of mood should the British use to shape China into such a domineering appearance, and their own empire on which the sun never sets, weak and powerless like a delicate girl......"

The British may look at the Chinese negotiators in the film and may itch their teeth with hatred. I want to stab him to death with a knife. But the same plot falls in the eyes of the Chinese themselves, but there is an evil 'pleasure'.

"If Britain now makes a peace agreement with China. Britain can then concentrate on its own country, back to Europe. You have lost India and Australia. Still want to lose Canada?

This war, the fighting outside Europe, can already be over. Do you really have what it takes to sustain the fighting in the Indian and Pacific Oceans? Without India, without hundreds of millions of Indians, does the British Empire really think that the sun never sets? None of you have the upper hand in the war on European soil, and you have to spend extra effort to maintain your presence in the Indian Ocean without access to the resources of the colonies. Personally, I think that a politically wise country like the UK can discern what choice to make at this time, and the right choice. ”

The domineering posture of Chinese diplomats in the negotiations. Mixed with the horrific images of white Australians and New Zealanders being relocated in clusters in the subsequent films, this sense of impact has never been experienced by Chinese.

Of course, there are some Chinese who have brain defects that will produce guilt, and then in the newspapers or on the Internet, they will make a lot of noise. But more Chinese feel that one report is one report, how hard the 'I Daqing' was beaten by the big nose of the West, and even the original version of the Old Summer Palace was looted, and then burned. Now that China is strong, isn't it natural to rob the British?

Oh. Yes. China attacked Australia, and the white people in Australia resisted fiercely, but they died a lot. You also have to admit that the number is not less than 1 million people. But how many Chinese has the British big nose harmed by selling white noodles to China?

Imagine what China would have become under the Manchu rule without Gaozu in that era? The Ottoman Empire did a good job of illustrating it. Even with China's strong support. The current Ottomans and the Ottomans of the past are also two countries.

China is very face-conscious, in those war movies shot by the Chinese. China's image has always been 'just'. Go to the South Seas and fight Central Asia. The seizure of Australia and the attack on India are all dressed in a big coat of 'protecting the security of the country's borders', and there must be bittersweet memories in the film, and the reasons why China fought Tsarist Russia and Britain are clearly explained. Even if China attacks North America, it will have to pull out the history of the blood and tears of countless Chinese laborers when the United States discriminated against the Chinese, anti-China and excludes China, and the tragic history of blood and tears of countless Chinese laborers when they built the east-west artery of the United States, so as to flaunt their own justice.

Therefore, in China's domestic war blockbusters, you can't see the arrogant and domineering 'China' at all. This film of the British satisfies the inner needs of the Chinese to a certain extent.

Because every Chinese has gone from school to society, and the Chinese history that has been studied since elementary school is clearly listed in the above a series of invasions and peeps by Western countries against China since the late Zhu Ming Dynasty, the brutal massacres of Nanyang Chinese by the Spaniards and the Dutch in the 16th/17th centuries, and specifically pointed out that in the late 19th century, the racial and ethnic determinism of 'white supremacy, the rest are inferior, and the racial, ethnic and doctrine policies were prevalent in the West. Even if the United States did not introduce the "Chinese Exclusion Act" as it did in the original time and space, the discrimination and exclusion of yellows and races in the Western world still had a large market before the First East-West War.

After all, China's two victories in the French war and the war against Russia at that time were all small-scale battles. Although the scale of the second Sino-Russian war is not small. Having been able to win these battles, China's strength has been recognized to a certain extent by the Western world. But it is impossible to squeeze into the ranks of the world's leading powers by relying on these battles. Even if most Western governments were able to see the fruits of China's industrialization over the years, the government acknowledged that the public did not see it that way. Then at the end of the 19th century, the '**** theory' and other historical facts that circulated in Europe all appeared in detail in Chinese history textbooks or historical stories for students to study.

China's education determines the Chinese's understanding of the history of those years and determines the Chinese's three views on life.

Therefore, Chinese will not really think that their homeland is the worst because of the most vicious depiction of China in the British film, but will have a sense of spiritual satisfaction. Just like the Americans in the original time and space, they will not recognize the heroic figure and tenacious fighting spirit of the Chinese volunteers in the Korean War, but will conclude in a discriminatory tone: stupid poor people brainwashed by redism! (To be continued.) )