The importance of 6,000 Australia, the United States authorities after the end of the year after the release of the data is the most convincing. [Full text reading]

According to a document released by the Pentagon at the beginning of the year, as early as after the Peninsular War, the US military formulated an extremely complete war plan for Australia's strategic security, and planned to use at least Tian Wan's troops to defend Australia. After the Japanese War, this war plan codenamed "Poseidon" was comprehensively upgraded, in addition to increasing the investment of conventional military forces, when necessary, the US military will also use tactical nuclear weapons to prevent the landing of the Republican ** team in Australia. Before the end of the war in India, the plan was escalated again, and according to the war plan drawn up by the US military, as long as the Republican ** team landed in Australia, the US military would not only use tactical nuclear weapons to attack the landed Republican ** team, but also use nuclear weapons to carry out a strategic all-round attack on the important military facilities of the Republic and even some of the local military installations. All in all, the United States did not hesitate to go to war with the Republic to keep Australia.

Although judging from the timing of the release of the relevant news by the US authorities, the main intention of this move is not to prove whether the United States has ever intended to go to war with the Republic for Australia, but to tell the Republic that the United States will never give up Australia, but judging from the international situation at that time, the United States attaches great importance to Australia and knows that the Republic has done something in Australia, and wants to warn the Republic with this.

In any case, any move by the Republic in Australia is tantamount to moving the cake on the plate of the United States.

If we look at the relationship between the Republic and the United States, it is not difficult to understand why the Chinese, who make up the total population of Australia, do not have the corresponding social status and political rights. You must know that even in other countries with a tradition of anti-Chinese, such as Indonesia, after the Republic of China has leapt from a regional power to a world power, they have adjusted their domestic policies and given corresponding social status and political rights to the Chinese, while some countries that are not Chinese exclusionary and have a large number of Chinese, such as Malaysia, have made full use of favorable conditions to establish new relations with the Republic. All in all, when the Republic has the determination and ability to defend the interests of the Chinese people around the world, only Australia does not take the interests of the Chinese seriously, and there is still no trend of the Shun'an Times, allowing the Chinese who occupy more than 30% of the social wealth to obtain the same political rights.

Looking at it from another angle, if it were not for the extraordinary relationship between Australia and the United States, even if Australia had a population of hundreds of millions of people in the last year, Australia's population would have exceeded 100 million, nearly 10,000 square kilometers of land, an extremely superior strategic geographical location, and a comprehensive national strength that is not too weak.

Here's the key. The Republic cannot treat Australia the way it treats Indonesia.

According to the punishment that was later declassified, since Ying, the intelligence agency of the Republic headed by the Military Busy Bureau has provided funds for the activities of the Chinese community in Australia through various secret channels to help the Australian Chinese chief seek political rights. More importantly, after the Indian War, under the influence of the third military reform, that is, the republic's national defense strength will enter a period of relative stability, and its external influence will be significantly reduced, so the republic's intelligence agencies have increased their penetration in the surrounding areas, including Australia, that is, to use the internal problems of these countries to achieve the purpose of containing the opponent. In a sense, it was these actions by the Republic's intelligence agencies that prevented the United States from making the most of Australia as envisaged and affected Australia's relations with the Republic.

In fact, it is not Australia that is most affected, but the United States.

Mentioned earlier. In the strategic layout of encirclement and suppression of the republic, the "iron triangle" formed by India, Australia, and Japan is the baseline of the strategic encirclement. The question is. In the aftermath of the wars of Japan and India, both countries that were supposed to play a major role in containing and suppressing the republics fell. One almost completely perished, the other fell to the republic, and only Australia remained on the west coast of the Pacific Ocean, becoming the most important strategic base of the United States in the region. In this way, it is unlikely that the US authorities will be able to take the issue of concern to Australia lightly.

The Pentagon's announcement of those Australian-related war plans in Lishaw is proof enough that the U.S. intelligence agencies have long known what their Republican counterparts are doing in Australia.

In fact, it is almost impossible to achieve complete secrecy in matters such as the financing of activities.

According to the relevant laws of Australia, all political parties and associations must publish their accounts on time, and if the funds are not in line with the income and expenditure, it will violate the law, which will lead to the dissolution of the political party and the dissolution of the association. Although funds can be transferred to Chinese communities in Australia in the name of donations, tens of millions of activity funds are definitely not a small amount. And the sudden increase in donations speaks for itself.

More importantly, after the war in India, the global economy began to warm.

As the Great Depression, which affected billions of people and lasted for many years, gradually receded at the end of the decade, and the economies of various countries have seen a recovery explosion, Australia as a resource exporter and a low-end industrial country has ushered in a new opportunity to expand.

According to the data released by the Australian authorities, the average economic growth rate in the old years from 2 years to the year of Li Feng was as high as the highest in the country. Auspicious. 7 stilts in the European Union. Even after the Great Depression, the recovery growth picture is stunned. Australia's economic growth rate is also above that of most economic entities, including the Republic, the United States and the European Union. Of course, the reason why Australia's economy is the first to recover is the same as during the financial crisis in the year of Knife Fly, that is, driven by the global economic recovery, the market has regained vitality, and the demand for resources in various countries has greatly increased, so that Australia's resource industry has taken the lead in recovery. In other words, Australia was able to emerge from the crisis first, and India's post-war reconstruction played a crucial role. In fact, during the Great Depression, Australia did not have a social collapse due to the export of resources like Brazil, one of the main reasons is that the post-war reconstruction of Iran, North Korea, Japan and other countries required a lot of resources, so that Australia's resource export enterprises have not been short of customers, and there has been no large-scale bankruptcy.

Thus, the Australian authorities should be grateful to the Republic, because the main factors that helped Australia through the crisis and drove Australia's economic recovery were all related to the Republic.

Even in Australia, there are many who believe that the Republic is a more important country.

As early as the year of Lishao, Australia's most prominent social economist, Svensson, wrote about Australia's relationship with two major powers. And made predictions about the future of Australia. According to Svensson, if Australia's foreign policy remains unchanged, that is, it continues to act as a pawn of the United States and stand in opposition to the Republic, then Australia will have to pray that the United States will be able to defeat the Republic in the next world war. What's more, even if the United States wins, Australia will be at best a pivotal country in the U.S. global strategic system, rather than a core country. On the other hand, if Australia were to change its foreign policy, taking into account the domestic social situation, the possibility of turning to the republic could be basically ruled out, so that the only thing Australia could adopt was to fight for a spiritual struggle similar to that of the European Union, and strive to become a great power with international influence and a significant voice in the international community. There is no doubt that becoming a great power is the only way to safeguard Australia's fundamental interests and avoid being torn apart by serious domestic contradictions. At the time, Svensson made it clear that because Australia's demographics were too complex, even white people still dominated the mainstream with the support of mixed-race communities. However, with the rapid growth of the yellow people, especially the Chinese society, and the blindly pro-American foreign policy, which will cause the mixed-race groups that determine the political status of Australia to turn to the Chinese community, Australia must take the initiative to change, and cannot wait for the social turmoil to come before passively changing.

It can be seen that there are still many people in the mainstream of Australian society who advocate following the example of the European Union. Become an independent speaker

The problem is, Australia is not the EU.

Although, fundamentally, Australia's conditions are much better than those of the EU, among other things. At least there is no integration problem, Australia is a unified country with independent sovereignty. But in some crucial areas, Australia is far inferior to the EU, and in particular, it is the real amount of national defense. Even though Australia's "nuclear capability" has been recognized by the international community with the support of the United States, and thus it has become one of the signatories of the London Treaty, Australia's real defense strength is not satisfactory. In the ranking of global military power, Australia is even inferior to Argentina in South America and Nigeria in Africa, and is only in the first place, which is the lowest ranking among all countries with a population of more than 100 million. Although in the past, the relatively poor national defense force not only did not make Australia's national security unguaranteed, but made Australia's economic development more vigorous, after all, the defense expenditure is too large, which will certainly have a negative impact on the social economy, but in the second half of the century, too weak military strength will not only not promote the economic exhibition, but will make Australia lose the right to speak in the international arena, thus affecting the economic exhibition.

All in all, what Australia lacks most is independent defence security.

Many Australian sociologists, including Svensson, admit that Australia would not survive even a day without the strategic security umbrella provided by the United States.

It is precisely in this way that any white person who supports reform will consider whether Australia will still be Australia if it offends the United States by going too quickly on the digital revolution.

From the white side, the answer is clearly no.

As a result, Australia is more conservative than the EU when it comes to reform.

In the words of some European news media, in terms of foreign policy, thanks to France's strategic strength and the economic strength of Germany and Italy, even if it has been negatively affected by Britain, the EU has not hesitated too much, and has long determined that "the spirit country is regarded as an indispensable ally, and the republic is no longer regarded as a flood beast in the eastern world, but very skillfully uses the contradictions between the United States and the republic to bring Europe to a new realm." Compared to the EU, Australia is not half a point worse. In terms of land area, all the member states of the European Union combined, the land area is less than 10,000 square kilometers. Australia's land area is close to 10,000 square kilometers, and the only thing that Europe does not lack is coal, and almost all other resources need to be imported, while Australia is almost not short of other resources except for some agricultural products, which is one of the few in the world; "Eryi has mineral resources, the political environment, the strategic position" is a powerful Russia, the south is the Arab world, the Atlantic Ocean is the United States, so we must pay attention to the construction of the army, navy and air force, and Australia is actually the largest island in the world, surrounded by the sea, west of the Indian Ocean, south of the sea is Antarctica, east of the vast Pacific Ocean, only north of Indonesia and Papua New Guinea, its strategic superiority is even above the United States and other aspects of the European Union, It is a very deplorable fact that Australia has not been able to be independent in its foreign policy.

Obviously, the assessment of the European news media is quite understandable.

Looking at it from another angle, if the EU had Australia's superior conditions, it would not only have been unified long ago, but would have even become a power that could compete with the United States.

In fact, that's the crux of the matter.

Under the influence of the United States, it is almost impossible for Australia to become a "great power" like the European Union

Since the beginning of the calendar year, as the economy recovered, Aufria once again threw itself into the arms of the United States, missing the best opportunity to reconcile with the Republic.

At the time, Australia lost its choice.

It is precisely in this way that from the year of the sword witch, the intelligence services of the republic no longer have any scruples and treat Australia as the number one ally of the United States.

In the face of the challenge of the Republic, the Australian authorities will only drift apart. For example, at that time, the Australian authorities enacted a bill that was considered to be specifically aimed at Chinese immigrants. It stipulates that all immigrants who apply for permanent residency in Australia need to go to a hospital designated by the Immigration Department for a rigid qualitative examination, and only eligible immigrants can obtain permanent residency. In the critical "condition." , for example, some genetic defects that are more common in yellow people are considered ineligible, and some genetic defects that are more common in white people are considered eligible. In fact. It was the bill, known as the "Paz Act", that introduced it by a member of parliament named Paz, and set the Republic's relationship with Australia back decades. When the bill was passed in the Australian Senate, Gu Weimin, the then state minister of the Republic, said that this kind of behavior of the Australian authorities was unacceptable, and the Republic would never recognize such a bill with obvious racial discrimination, and would also provide all help, including legal aid, to the Chinese in Australia in order to safeguard the interests of the Chinese. Since the beginning of the knife year, dozens of Chinese Australian associations have jointly sued the Supreme Court to repeal the bill, which clearly violates the Constitution. Because not everyone supports the views of the Chinese on the question of whether there is a violation of the Constitution, this lawsuit has been fought for many years from the beginning of the year, and there is still no hope of ending it in the past years.

Judging by the information published by the United States, it is precisely because of the "Paz Law" that the US military revised the "Poseidon." "It is believed that the Republic is very likely to invade Australia if it cannot bear it."

At this point, there is practically no room for recovery in the republic's relations with Australia.

Although in the second year, that is, after the end of the large-scale battle of the Middle East War, the Australian authorities tried to improve relations with the republic, for example, the Australian prime minister visited the republic twice in a formal and unofficial manner within the year, but the republican authorities did not consider it necessary to improve relations with Australia, Yan Jingyu twice blocked the Australian prime minister, and put the premier of the State Council Yan Shanglong and the deputy economic premier Shuai Yongkang on the top.

Everyone knows that there is only one situation left in Australia's relations with the Republic.

It is precisely for this reason that after Indonesian President Espirano announced his resignation and the pro-China vice president took power, the Australian authorities issued an extremely strong statement, claiming that the Republic had brought down the Indonesian president, who had been trying to find a space for independence, through this conspiracy, and set Indonesia's democratic process back for decades. An Australian newspaper even mentioned the "colony" in an editorial, arguing that Indonesia would be the first colony of the republic with Espirano stepping down.

Even if Australia is speaking for the United States, such strong language is indeed very surprising.

This is also enough to show that Indonesia's fall to the Republic made the Australian authorities feel threatened, especially when the Republic's aircraft carrier battle group entered the Banda Sea, the Australian authorities immediately let the fleet go to the Afra Sea, blocking the front of the Republic fleet.

Of course, there was absolutely no reason for the republic to cross the Afra Sea and land in Australia in the year.

In fact, according to later declassified information, before the outbreak of the war, the Republic did not think of defeating Australia in the Pacific Ocean first.

The problem is that by this time, the United States has not taken a direct position.

Undoubtedly, this is a very abnormal phenomenon. As mentioned earlier, in the global strategic system of the United States, Australia's position is even higher than that of Canada and the United Kingdom, and it can basically be called the number one ally of the United States. The silence of the US authorities in the face of the threat to Australia only shows that the US attention is not on this side, but on doing something else, and something more important.