See the fastest updates

【Author】Long Kong's "RMX"

The previous "Scientology" posts all used the "scientific method" to implement the "Church of God" method.

This post, in turn, uses the format of "Divine Religion" to set science.

Let's try to see what conclusions we can draw from the history of science if we look at it as a religion and use the history of religion to see it.

The basic idea is simple.

Historically, it has been a trend for polytheistic religions to be replaced by monotheistic religions.

In the future, it is very likely that monotheistic religions will be replaced by "atheistic" religions.

Science can be regarded as a kind of "godless" "ideology", which believes in objective laws and human rationality and cognitive ability.

If science is really a religion, then the university is a seminary and a church house.

In the world, people who have not attended university have a limited political future.

Yes, science, as an ideology, is about to achieve the unity of politics and "religion" within the world realm.

If science were to be regarded as a religion, Catholicism would have been repeatedly defeated.

At first, scientists need the bishop's permission to speak, and they can be burned to death;

After that, the scientist can argue with the bishop, and then the bishop will go to the scientist to argue and no one will pay attention;

Now, to show that religion does not affect IQ, we can only rely on the fabrication that "scientists like Darwin and Einstein also believed in religion."

Yes, even for some superstitious people (see the fastest update), it is the "scientist identity" who makes the most final value judgment, which is used as an authority to prove that "religion" is not stupid.

If we had put it 200 years ago, a single bishop would have guaranteed authority, because the Bible was regarded by most people as a source of truth.

Unlike now, in order to guarantee authority, it is necessary to say that this bishop is actually engaged in scientific research and has the title of so-and-so professor.

If science is really regarded as a religion, then science has a far greater grasp of discourse than all religions in history.

When science unites to raise its voice that a nuclear war will destroy both sides, the Soviet Union would rather collapse than fight.

When the science coalition speaks out that the earth will warm, countless shopping malls will reduce emissions by turning on air conditioning.

Yes, science, as an ideology, has gained authority as a source of truth.

Physicists have the ability to explain experimental facts and explain the origin of the universe (

The update speed is fast, and you can find this site by Baidu search. right,

FDA chemists and medical scientists have the right to decide whether beef, pork, milk, etc. can be eaten.

Economists, on the other hand, have the power to interpret statistics and formulate economic and tax policies.

Three hundred years ago, the Catholic Church burned scientists to death on charges of cult belief.

Today, most religious people say that science must not be a religion.

Yes, science as an ideology, if it is really a religion akin to Catholicism,

Then other religions can only pray to God and worship Buddha.

Now, most religious people do believe from the bottom of their hearts that science is not a religion.

In this way, they can be religious outside of science.

Fortunately, science is just an ideology.