About historical rigor
I couldn't sleep in the middle of the night, so I read the "Guide to Internet Literature Newcomers" that I had read several times.
I have summed up the biggest problem with "Ghost Horse", which only wrote tens of thousands of words -- it is undoubtedly a very unserious attitude towards historical figures and events.
Everyone has their own Three Kingdoms, and everyone has their own Three Kingdoms attitude. But when the entire character and even the background of the story are distorted, the novel may fail.
I feel like I'm really biased in this regard. Just imagine, if I don't know much about the Three Kingdoms, but accidentally clicked on my own book, after reading it, how much distraction will I have in my mind about the characters of the Three Kingdoms?
The reason why a novel with a historical theme can be popular is that the author's personal thoughts on historical events are attached to the text, and then it is recognized by most readers.
This is one of the things I'm working on in the future.
The starting point of this "Ghost Horse" is to be funny, but it does not take responsibility for the seriousness of history, and maybe my essay will not have as much impact as I thought, but it is still a sentence - I have gone astray.
But the novel is different from others, if it goes crooked, it must be finished, because credibility is more important than everything. Seven days recommended to five days, although I can't explain anything, I feel a lot more confident, so I hold my own summary, try to twist the right way in the later text, hoping to bring comfort to readers who accidentally poked.