The above five science questions are too simple, they can be completed in three hours, after all, you only need to calculate, you don't need to think; Only logic is needed, no knowledge is needed.

I even felt that the science questions were too simple to be called questions.

For example, the simplest math problem "Calculate how much is 1+1" is the same as the problem "Calculate the logical stacking of fuzzy multidimensional matrices", but they only have different calculation times.

For example, the simplest physics problem, "How much work do you do to lift one meter with the imperial power of an ox", is the same as the question "How does an airplane fly from the earth to the moon", but they are also different in time.

Think about it, you can definitely say the answer to the previous question directly; If you're smart enough, you can just say the answer to the question that follows; If you can't say it, it means that you are mentally retarded; If you are mentally retarded enough to describe this kind of problem that requires calculation (and there must be a unique answer to it) as a "problem", it only proves that you are mentally retarded who does not admit that you are mentally retarded......

Suddenly, something came to mind...... My father always didn't like me to read, and he always said, "The amount of knowledge has nothing to do with the right or wrong of knowledge, except that it can only aggravate your right and wrong." When he quarreled with Uncle Wuji, his father would yell: "Do you know what 'synonymous repetition' is? ”……

Okay, I'm going to try it now, don't think about it, hurry up and do the question!

The following liberal arts questions are hard!

-

-

The sixth question, "What conclusions can we draw from the fate of the previous dynasty?" ”

This is clearly a false proposition.

No one in the world knows history. History has been changed beyond recognition a long time ago, and people have replaced wrong history with more wrong history a long, long time ago. The path is so complex that either direction is wrong, like a labyrinth with no exit.

We look for history as if we were looking for the present time in our own dreams.

People say that we have more than 10,000 years of history, but I have read those ancient books, and the ancient books from 10,000 years ago also say that they have more than 10,000 years of history, and I can even say that the books from 10,000 years later will also say that we have more than 10,000 years of history. As for how many years of history we have? Who the knows!

Even the referents of things are confusing. If a ruler is clever enough, he will surely eliminate even the tool of disorder: language itself. The concept has gone through more than 10,000 years, like, who knew that in the past a dog meant a dog, not a cat?

In the history of the previous dynasty, every word is wrong, and it is even inferior to folk novels, at least novels can still express people's true feelings. It is a big joke to find out the truth of history from these typos.

So my answer is: there is no "previous dynasty", there is no "end", there is no "conclusion", nothing.

Of course I wouldn't write like that, and if I did, it wasn't because people wouldn't understand it, but because they would throw me into a psychiatric hospital—a mentally ill person would be imprisoned in a royal psychiatric hospital. It was a place where only people entered, but no one came out, although it was founded by the emperor by special order to take care of the spiritual life of his subjects. Even criminals are better off than mentally ill people, because crimes are directly executed, which is like the mentally ill being tortured......

I wrote like this: The previous dynasty did a lot of evil and acted against the sky, the royal family of the previous dynasty abandoned the previous dynasty, the people abandoned the former dynasty, and the heavens abandoned the previous dynasty. At this time, the world fell Zhu Dachang, he conformed to the favorable time, place and people, overthrew the previous dynasty, and relieved the people from hanging upside down. People chose the emperor, God chose the emperor, fate chose the emperor, and the emperor accepted the Zen concession and ruled the world.

It's a few thousand words.

-

-

Question 7: "You just met the Holy One today, so what is your impression of the Emperor?" ”

How should I answer?

I think, first of all, the Emperor of the Ming Dynasty, Zhu Dachang, should be a strong man, after all, he was the one who "received Zen" from the country, but it is difficult to determine the quality of the emperor later.

It takes talent, struggle, and timing for a person to achieve something, and it is difficult for later emperors to inherit talent, and he does not need to struggle, and the timing is equal.

Let's talk about talent first, people say that the royal family is the foundation, the scholars are the branches, and the commoners are the branches and leaves, this metaphor looks very good, but the metaphor is always a metaphor, and it is useless. Not to mention anything else, take the examination as an example, although the examination clearly stipulates that only scholars are allowed to participate, but now almost all of the participants are "scholars from civilian origin", whether they are literati or martial artists, there are almost no real children of scholars. Those children of the scholar clan are stupid to death, and they are useless.

Let's talk about struggle. What did the emperor fight with? A person who is born to be chosen by God, sits and enjoys the world, does not move, and is very comfortable.

There are only a few hundred members of the royal family, and the entire noble class is only one percent, and the timing is equal for everyone.

So I thought: the later emperors only considered themselves strong.

The problem is that everyone also thinks that the emperor is strong. That's why many mentally handicapped and mentally ill emperors will also plague many people, some emperors who can't speak well, just say a word casually, everyone will obey absolutely, and one emperor can turn the world into hell.

Power is indeed a very interesting thing.

Power comes from self-identity. It was very correct, natural, and appropriate for the initial people to agree with the power of the ancestral emperor, but later people recognized the later emperor, which was just inertia. The crowd of people who bowed down and the emperor who was bowed down to formed an unreasonable world, like a pavilion on the beach.

Unaware of them, they and the temporary world in which they exist will eventually lead to a new future, and a truly powerful new emperor will re-establish a reasonable new world. Then history continues its infinite loop. Everything is meaningless......

So my answer is: Zhu Zhaotian is an emperor who has nothing to show for himself, and his ruling order is very unstable.

Of course I wouldn't write like that, and if I wrote like this, I would be wiped out of the Ten Clans, and all the people I knew and didn't know would die miserably.

I wrote like this, thank the emperor from history, thank the emperor from reality, thank the emperor emotionally, thank the emperor theoretically, thank the emperor from the sect, the emperor is the truth, the emperor is justice, the emperor is the faith, and in the end, even I was convinced, even I was moved, and I almost burst into tears.

Sprinkle thousands of words.

-

-

The eighth question: "If you become the chief assistant of the imperial court, how will you assist the emperor in creating a prosperous world?" ”

This is a very happy question.

You can write as much as you want, as well as you want – the question is, how do you do it? Your own "how" means that four billion people are "how" with you.

Therefore, a person's "how" has a fart use!

I want pork to fall from the sky, and let 4 billion people marry 100 wives and have 1,000 sons each...... Is this good? Good for sure! However, there is an egg to use! It can't be done at all!

But...... Having said that, theoretically, it can still be done...... For example, building pig farms on other planets, raising women's farms, and inventing elixirs......

I thought about it carefully and wrote down every "prosperous era" in the "King James History Book...... Suddenly, it occurred to me, damn it, every dynasty is a "prosperous age" every year! Therefore, this question is a "trap question"!

In other words, if you show the slightest sign that "this is not a prosperous time", you will be executed for "treason"!

Therefore, I wrote at the beginning: "The Ming Dynasty opened for 500 years, every year is a prosperous era, and now it is a prosperous era in a prosperous era. But for the sake of the emperor, the court, and the people, I must ...... "Balabala's ......

Sprinkle thousands of words.

-

-

Question 9: "On the relationship between the emperor and God." ”

Hell title.

For someone like me who believes in atheism, what the is this called! I don't think there is a god in the world!

However, since I am taking an exam and encounter this kind of question, I will reluctantly answer it.

This question tests memory, but also the appeal of feelings. You have to really believe – that the Emperor, the Son of God, and God are a Trinity.

First of all, the world has a cause and an effect, and a beginning and an end. If there is no causal logic in the world, no logic of time, then everyone can die - because everything is chaos, everything is meaningless.

Second, since the world has a cause and must have an effect, and a beginning and an end, then there must be a cause that is the first cause, and a time that is the first time. Many sects say the first reason and the first time by different names, such as justice, freedom, morality, immortals, Hades, science, etc., in fact, they are all the same! The name doesn't matter, it's the thing that matters!

Again, let's say that thing is called "God", and of course, you can also say that thing is called Justice, Freedom, Morality, Immortals, Hades, Science, Lord, Progress, People...... Again, no one can prove whether it's or not, anyway, you didn't invent these concepts, you listened to others, you don't have anything to do......

In the end, such an ethereal thing as "God" must have a real object, because it is all ethereal, what are you doing with it?! So, well, the Son of God (the representative of God in the world) is the emperor. Of course, you can also say that Uncle Wang next door is the son of God - or that sentence, no one can prove whether it is or not, so we can only choose one, and it doesn't matter who you choose, you think that Uncle Wang next door is the son of God, then his old man is the son of God......

Finally, we argue that God, the Son, and the Emperor are a Trinity. Of course, we can also argue that God, God's son, God's daughter, God's wife, God's nephew, God's father, God's dog, ...... It's many-in-one, but it's still the same sentence: no one can prove it, we can only choose one, so let's choose the trinity......

Of course, I can't write that, I'm just arguing that "the world was created by God, and the emperor is the son of God". There must be a logical hole in the middle, but it is impossible for the examiner to point out my logical hole; Because he pointed out that he was plotting rebellion......

Sprinkle thousands of words.

-

-

Question 10: "The emperor and your father fell into the river at the same time, which one would you save first?" ”

As soon as I saw this question, I almost wanted to stand up and jerk out the questioner's mouth.

Suddenly, a tragic memory scenario appeared in my mind: my mother asked me, if she divorced her father, who would I choose?

……

The past is unbearable...... I don't even remember my mother, but when I try it now, I suddenly remember it......

……

Okay, don't remember, move on.

In fact, this question often appears in the exam, and there are many variations:

Your wife and your wife fell into the river at the same time, which one would you save first?

Your son and your dad fell into the river at the same time, which one would you save first?

An old man and a child fall into the river at the same time, which one will you save first?

Ten fat people and one thin man fell into the river at the same time, will you save the fat man or the thin man first?

If 10,000 criminals and a good citizen fall into the river at the same time, will you save the criminals or the good citizens first?

……

Of course, some people will answer loudly and with their own cleverness: I will save them all!

It's a pity that he digressed, because the question was written word by word: which "one" to save!

Therefore, you have to choose one of the Emperor and Daddy.

The standard correct answer to this question is undoubtedly "emperor", but why the emperor is the key point.

My answer is something like this:

Of course I saved the emperor. This is not a question of great filial piety and small filial piety, because filial piety is faith, and faith is immeasurable; If you measure faith, it shows that you are ready to give up your faith and will definitely give it up. The emperor was my choice, but my father was not; I'm in charge of what I choose, I'm not in charge of what I don't choose. This is the unity of rights and duties, this is the unity of logic, and this is the unity of truth. My father gave birth to me, and that was his choice; He's in charge of me, not me in charge of him. I chose the emperor, and I must be responsible for the emperor. If I'm guilty, it's my original sin, and it's part of the world's original sin—we can't avoid original sin, we're just mortals.

Of course, the above answers are only written for the examiner to see, and I will never agree with them.

You're going to say, "Oh, you must have saved your father and not the emperor." ”

Wrong! My real answer is: "Whoever asks me this question, I drown whoever is in the toilet!" ”

-

-

The eleventh and final question: "Who are we?" Where do we come from? Where are we going? ”

This additional question! It's a triptych!

I'm furious!

This ultimate philosophical proposition can also be tested!

So vicious!

So angry!

So straight to the end!

I will know the first ten questions, although the answer I wrote is not the answer I really want to write, but for the eleventh question, I can't write the sincere answer if I want to, because I can't write this question.

Not really.

The question is open – really open-ended.

The first ten questions basically have directions, but this one really doesn't. There are four major religions in the Ming Dynasty, and you can be religious if you don't believe in them - as long as you are loyal to the emperor.

The four great religions are Confucianism, Theology, Buddhism, and Taoism, and they are hostile to each other, and the only thing they have in common is loyalty to the emperor.

What religion do I believe, you ask? I don't believe anything! And I don't even believe in "I don't believe anything"! I don't even believe in "I don't believe anything...... Forever self-denial, forever self-doubt, forever changing, never stopping!

……

Moreover, there is another fatal problem with this problem: the faith of the graders.

Who is the grader? Imperial officials, royal family or emperors? Each stage of marking is different, the first is the low-level imperial officials, they think it is good, they give it to the senior imperial officials, then to the more senior imperial officials, and finally the emperor himself. You've got to serve everybody well – it's a stroke of luck.

Think about it, if your answer is "We are mortals, we are God's creatures, and we will be judged in hell or heaven in the future", it means that you believe in God's religion, and if the person reading the paper is a Confucian, Buddhist, or Taoist, then you will die.

The same is true for other cases.

Damn it! It's like buying a lottery ticket!

No way! I have to combine the four teachings! Even the non-believers are combined!

I would pretend to be a Confucian, a Confucian, a Buddhist, a Taoist, imagine how they would feel when they saw my scroll, and then revis, and then revis, and then revis, and then revis......

By the time I'm done writing 10,000 words, I've unified the four major denominations and even the atheists – I think it's schizophrenic!

-

-

When the morning sun shines on the table from one direction, the answer begins, and when the setting sun hits the table again from the other direction, the answer ends.

This is the end of the most important event of the year for the Empire.

The fate of countless people was decided, but no one knew.

In any case, the results of the list after a month are irrevocable.

The future is predestined, the future cannot be changed, and no one knows the future.