Some things just can't stand up to pondering, Nasser was secretly wary of the Americans, and he was a little suspicious, and now after such a toss in the UN Security Council, his trust in the United States has plummeted, and he is expected to listen to the opinions of American advisers in full? That's what a ghost you see!

So Nasser immediately changed his mind and ordered his troops to pursue immediately, and they must attack Huanglong directly. Pen & Fun & Pavilion www.biquge.info And this order was fatal from a later point of view, not only did it make the Egyptian army ambushed, but more importantly, it made Egypt's honeymoon period with the United States end early. The growing contradictions and differences between the two countries eventually led to a full-scale reversal later.

But that's all for later, let's take a look at the current situation first. While Nasser ordered the Egyptian army to pursue the IDF, Learvin suddenly visited the Soviet Union as an adviser to the former prime minister, and the woman named him in the hope of meeting with Li Xiaofeng.

Speaking of the beginning of 1949, the political situation in Britain is also quite turbulent, Attlee's approval rating has fallen all the way because of various measures "unpopular", anyway, by the end of 1949, his approval rating has fallen to single digits, and less than 10% of the British people still support the prime minister.

Such approval ratings are a politician's nightmare, not only announcing that Attlee's next term is hopeless, but more importantly, even the Labour Party that Attlee belongs to is very dangerous. Because of Labour's support rate, because Attlee "dragged his feet", it was also quite ugly. If drastic measures are not taken quickly, the next Labour Party will again become an opposition party.

In other words, the choice before Attlee is simple: he must resign and resign to wash the ground for Labour's future general election. Here we have to talk about the British political system, the British prime minister is not actually elected by universal suffrage. In every general election, British voters have to decide which party to choose is not who to choose as prime minister, but which party to govern. Whichever ruling party has a simple majority in the House of Commons is in power, and the Prime Minister is the leader of that party.

Therefore, it is the House of Commons that determines the ownership of the Prime Minister, and whoever has a majority in the House of Commons will be the Prime Minister. Some comrades may ask, what if several political parties are running in the election, and none of them can win a simple majority? Usually at such a time, these parties will join each other to form a coalition government.

Generally speaking, the term of office of a member of the House of Commons is five years, and the term of office of a natural prime minister is also five years, but not all prime ministers will serve for five years. Some prime ministers may resign or be ousted from power by the party (usually rarely), such as Neville Chamberlain in World War II and Churchill after World War II. The resignation of the British prime minister generally does not mean a new general election, as long as the prime minister is elected by the majority party, and another party leader is elected.

So for the current Attlee, because the support rate is terrible, he has actually been abandoned by the party, a large number of Labour MPs strongly demand that Attlee resign immediately, and replace someone as prime minister, not to mention to save the declining support rate, at least let voters see the new atmosphere of the Labour Party.

To tell the truth, Attlee at this time is a bit of a betrayal, the party is already overwhelmingly against him, and the people don't like him, no matter how you look at him, it is impossible for him to finish the rest of his term.

In this case, Attlee had two options, one was to resign voluntarily and let the party elect a new prime minister to replace him. The second option is to simply dissolve parliament and start early elections.

The first option meant that Attlee stepped down and took the blame for all the "sins" of the Labour Party and himself, but this choice was humiliating, almost being driven out of 10 Downing Street, and completely a poor loser.

Attlee never considered himself a loser, let alone a laughing stock, and naturally he did not want to end his political career in this way. So the second option?

The second option isn't so rosy. Generally speaking, the prime minister will not dissolve parliament early and start a general election without a specific reason. Because for parliamentarians, the general election also means a big exam, who can guarantee that they will get a good score? What if a fallen grandson mountain? Who doesn't want to work peacefully for five years before going to the big exam?

What's more, every election means that a lot of energy and money are consumed, who wants to toss so much?

Generally, when an early general election is held, either the prime minister's party is full of confidence, or the prime minister's party cannot get along and can only rely on the election to shuffle the cards. In terms of the grim situation, it is understandable that the Labour Party is now holding an early general election, after all, the situation is indeed not good, so it is better to directly start the bragging and fooling contest, and use the new policy and new programme to fool the voters, and maybe it can turn defeat into victory?

However, at this time, not all MPs in the Labour Party agreed to dissolve Parliament early and start the general election, because the current situation is really unfavorable for the Labour Party, and the polls show that the Conservative Party has a huge advantage, and if the general election starts at this time, the Labour Party may be beaten and lose the hat of the ruling party.

For Labour MPs, it would be best to use the next year to fight a few turnarounds to bring back some support before going head-to-head with the Conservatives. And if you want to turn over, you naturally have to get rid of Attlee, a pig teammate and a drag bottle. Without the Attlee Labor Party's support, I am afraid it would not be so miserable.

So the current situation is very interesting, the Labour Party is hoping that Attlee will hurry up and bastard as soon as possible, and it is better for Attlee to take the initiative to resign, so that he can dump everything on him, and naturally the Labour Party can start again.

But for Attlee, he is naturally unwilling to carry the pots, and these pots are not his fault alone, so why should he be left alone? Attlee knows that he is out of action in this election, but he still wants to get out of office with dignity, at least to complete this term, right?

So there was a stalemate between the Labour Party and Attlee, with Labour MPs hoping that Attlee would resign as soon as possible, while Attlee wanted to leave office at the end of his term. Labour MPs kept putting pressure on Attlee to leave, but Attlee said it would be okay for him to get out of the way, and he would immediately dissolve Parliament and start a general election.

As mentioned earlier, it is not good for the Labour Party to start the general election immediately, so the Labour MPs do not dare to rush too much, otherwise Attlee will really jump over the wall and break the net with them. This is really a painful situation where the two sides of the wolf are scared. In any case, Attlee and the Labour MPs must have to make concessions, otherwise they will lose both.

And in this case, it is the Conservatives who benefit, and the Conservatives will not be polite to the Labour Party, and they still remember the humiliation of 1945, so they are constantly chasing after the victory, and attacking the Labour Party in a big way, anyway, Attlee is crumbling under heavy pressure, and it is not surprising that he will not be able to resist for long. If it's fast, the general election will probably start right away.

Churchill is full of confidence in this election, in his opinion, the Labour Party is actually out of play, even if Attlee is automatically out of power now, it is impossible for the Labour Party to change the situation in just one year, because they have done too badly in the past four years, it is really impossible to wash it clean.

For Churchill, the most important thing now is not how to win the election, but to think ahead about the way out of Britain. Churchill had already discovered that Britain had reached the most critical and fatal moment, so to speak, Britain had reached a crossroads, and if it chose the wrong path, there was no hope for the future.

In Churchill's view, Britain had the following possibilities for the future: if it did not change, it would be a dead end, like the once great empires that were buried in the dustbin of history. So Britain has to change, and only change can survive.

How to change it? Nature is adapting to the changes of the times. This era no longer belongs to the British Empire, the strong rise of the United States and the Soviet Union is inevitable, and if the British Empire drags its broken body to face these two powerful enemies, there is only one result, that is, it will be crushed into slag.

Churchill naturally didn't want to be crushed into slag, so what he had to do was to survive between the two emerging hegemons, and only by keeping the fire of the empire alive could he have a chance to make a comeback. Churchill saw the rise of the United States and the Soviet Union as both a great misfortune for the British Empire, but also a great blessing.

Why? In the past, when an empire came to an end, it was usually picked off by the only challenger. Naturally, the new victor will kill the old empire and leave no future trouble. But this time it was different, there were two strong challengers, and these two effortlessly allowed British hegemony to decline, but at the same time, fortunately, the hegemony was not won by either one, and these two had to go through a fierce competition if they wanted to enjoy hegemony alone. In other words, these two families are each other's biggest enemies, but the old overlords before are not so hateful. And this gave Britain a respite.

Churchill believed that if the two tigers fought each other, one would be injured, and if they didn't get it right, they would lose both, and of course it was better to lose both. Taking advantage of this opportunity, Britain can recover and develop, and when both sides lose, Britain can rejoin the struggle for hegemony.

The old smoker values this opportunity very much, and also thinks that this is the last chance for Britain, and whether it can restore the glory of the empire on which the sun never sets is here. And to achieve this great revival, it is important to make the United States and the Soviet Union fight a little harder. So this led to Liervin's trip to Moscow.

Liervin's mission to Moscow was, in short, to sow discord, to add fuel to the fire, to undermine the restraint between the Soviet Union and the United States, and to make the two countries fight, so that Britain could benefit from the middle.

If you think about it, the United States and the Soviet Union are now evenly matched, and even the Soviet Union still has a certain advantage, and these two will definitely not be able to distinguish between the winners and losers in a short period of time. When the two PKs are in the middle, the British can turn him upside down, when the Americans are weak, they talk about the special partnership between Britain and the United States, and when the Soviet Union is unlucky, they secretly pull the hind legs of the United States, such means Britain is too familiar with and too good at it, Churchill believes that at most 50 years, at the latest 100 years, the United States and the Soviet Union will inevitably divide the winner and loser, and then it will be the turn of the British Empire to re-emerge.

Of course, these are all long-term plans, and for the time being, Liervin's main thing to talk about when he goes to Moscow is the issue of the Suez Canal. Britain has been put on a tough note by the United States on this issue, and although Britain is still the majority shareholder of the so-called Suez Canal Company, everyone knows that Britain no longer has the right to speak. The British are very unwilling to do this, this time Nasser suddenly shot at Israel, so that the British see a possibility, if with the help of Israel's hand to teach Nasser a hard lesson, then Britain is not without the possibility of reversing a game on the Suez Canal issue, if the Soviet Union or Israel can also be introduced into the Suez Canal Company, then the company will become a mess, in order to suppress Israel and the Soviet Union, the United States will inevitably cooperate with Britain, and then Britain will be able to win back some of the right to speak. And let the Soviet Union and the United States directly pinch each other on the Suez Canal, that is definitely a good way to rub the fire, and these two can coexist peacefully? It's completely impossible, maybe a small fire will become a big fire, and in less than two days, the two will fight again.

No matter who wins or loses when the fight starts, there will be attrition, and attrition means that Britain can slowly chase after it, and in the long run, who dares to say that it can't kill the Soviet Union or the United States.

Of course, Learvin also knows that things are not so simple, neither the United States nor the Soviet Union are fools who will let Britain fool them, especially a certain immortal who is about to come to power in the Soviet Union is simply a fox among foxes, only he fools others, and there is almost no when he is fooled. Negotiating conditions with such people is tantamount to taking a chill out of the fire.

Although it was very difficult, Liervin was not completely devoid of confidence, and her confidence lay in having seen through the Soviet Union's deployment in the Middle East. When the T Communist Party proposed a cease-fire agreement, Learvin knew that there was definitely a problem here, and after reading the relevant information of MI5 and MI6, Learvin was sure that what was in front of the Egyptians was a sinkhole. This time, the Jews were probably prepared to teach the Egyptians a glorious war of annihilation. And if this goal is achieved, it means that the entire Sinai Peninsula will fall into the hands of Israel.

For Egypt, the loss of the Sinai Peninsula means that Israel has invaded the Suez Canal, and can even directly threaten Cairo. It's like letting the Jews put their guns to their temples. Needless to say, how dangerous is this?

Of course, all this has not yet been realized, although the Egyptians have been tricked, but not so deep, if they can take advantage of the early stop, naturally they will not lose their bottoms, maybe they can still keep a lot of strongholds in the Sinai Peninsula, and this is the British said to move the Soviet Union's hole card...... (To be continued.) )