It's not that Tito doesn't want to get rid of the relationship, but he can't, at this time, in the face of the military pressure of the Soviet Union, he urgently needs external support, even if the consequences of this support are somewhat unpredictable, he must do it, otherwise he will really be beaten all the way by the Soviet Union. Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 info

In addition, Tito was not without backup means, on the one hand, he brought in the support of the United States, and on the other hand, he also showed goodwill to the Soviet Union through Li Poker, Luxembourg, and Dimitrov, showing that he was not completely attached to the United States. Anyway, Tito is dancing on the tip of the knife, and the consequences of the slightest mistake are unpredictable.

This directly led to the fact that in the second half of 1945, Europe did not return to calm as expected, and the military conflicts that broke out in Turkey and Yugoslavia made Europeans who had just experienced the smoke of World War II still fearful, for fear that the third world war would break out as soon as they woke up.

Especially after the conflicts in Yugoslavia and Turkey intensified, and even directly involved the Soviet Union and the United States, some peace-loving Europeans could not sit still, and they not only hoped for an immediate end to the violent conflicts in the region, but also hoped for a new international organization to deal with international disputes, at least to avoid the outbreak of World War III.

And this call is getting louder and louder, and after entering November, the call reached its peak. This has forced politicians to start thinking about this issue. In fact, according to the relevant agreement reached by the allies in World War II, after the victory over the Axis powers, a new international body will replace the previous League of Nations with the important task of "maintaining world peace". But because of the well-known contradictions between the Soviet Union and Britain and the United States, this new institution was shelved halfway, after all, if the Soviet Union took the lead in saying that it would not participate in the new body, and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe would not join, then what was the point of this new body?

In particular, after the Soviet Union unilaterally erected the banner of the CIS, the new institutions that were originally intended to be established by the relevant agreements of the allies can be said to be stillborn. In order to confront the CIS, the Americans and the British are now actively planning to form a NATO system. If it were not for the fact that the voice of the people is too high now, and the meaning of NATO's confrontation with the CIS is too strong, the Americans and the British, afraid of causing a further backlash from the Soviet Union, have temporarily shelved the collective declaration of NATO.

Of course, the establishment of NATO is unstoppable, and it is only a matter of time. And the future United Nations, driven by civil pressure, has temporarily taken the lead.

On November 11, 1945, representatives of the Soviet Union, the United States, Britain, France, and China gathered in Brussels to discuss the establishment of the United Nations. In fact, the relevant framework has been laid before, and all that is needed is to endorse the negotiation process.

But the process is not that easy. First of all, there is the quarrel over several core issues of the UN Charter, to put it bluntly, how to distribute the privileges of the five hooligans.

After solving this problem, the thornier issue is still to come, the United Nations is an international organization, and the countries participating in this organization, or which forces can represent those countries in joining the United Nations, will have to be debated here. The question of the representation of Norway, the Danish Confederation, Slovenia, Israel and China immediately sparked a big quarrel.

Let's start with the simplest issue of the Norwegian-Danish federation. As mentioned earlier, a certain immortal put Prince Alexei on the throne of Norway, and then killed the Danish royal family, and once again gave Prince Alexei the right to inherit the Danish throne. After the victory in World War II, Norway and Denmark were once again crumpled into a federation. But at the same time, the Danish government-in-exile in London was supported by the British, and Britain and the United States did not recognize Norway and the Danish Commonwealth. Norway and Denmark, the two victorious powers of World War II, are also members of the allies and must enjoy the treatment of founding members of the United Nations.

Britain and the United States naturally supported the Danish government-in-exile, while the Soviet Union certainly supported Prince Alexei, and neither side could make concessions, so the question was deadlocked.

Note that this is not the most difficult issue, for similar reasons, Slovenia's entry into the United Nations has also met with Tito's strongest opposition, and if Slovenia joins the United Nations in a bright and open manner, will it not be tantamount to saying that the international community has recognized Slovenia's independence? You say Tito could endure it?

Then there's the issue of Israel. This question must be carefully addressed, because this Israel at this time is not the Israel of history, and the current Israel is actually the renamed version of East Prussia. According to Li Xiaofeng's suggestion, Ben. Gurion renamed the Republic of East Prussia the Republic of Israel, and then applied for membership in the United Nations under the name of the Republic of Israel.

Maybe in the eyes of ordinary people, isn't this just a name change, what's the big deal? But politically sensitive people would never see it that way, so why change the name? Whether it is Chinese or foreign, there is a saying that the name is not right, and the word is not good. Israel and East Prussia are very different, Israel is the name of ancient Palestine, and this name is full of Jewish elements. The renaming of East Prussia to Israel was tantamount to linking up with Palestine, and at a time when the Jewish Liberation Army in Palestine was demanding a high degree of autonomy, everyone knew that this was actually a prelude to independence, and once the two sides were linked, the new Republic of Israel had every reason to meddle in Palestinian affairs. Do you say that the British are willing to do it?

So don't underestimate a name. Fighting for a name also exists nationally. For example, after the disintegration of Yugoslavia, we know that it was divided into several parts, one of which was called Macedonia. However, when Macedonia applied for membership in the United Nations, Greece immediately quit and insisted that Macedonia join the United Nations, but it had to be noted that it would join the United Nations in the name of Macedonia, the former Yugoslavia.

Why did Greece place special emphasis on the term Macedonia in the former Yugoslavia? Because very simply, Macedonia was a state of ancient Greece, and it also went abroad in history to pressure fierce people like the Great Mountain. But what is very much is that the Macedonia in history has nothing to do with the Macedonia of the former Yugoslavia, and Greece insists on asking for special notes in order to prevent the Macedonia of the former Yugoslavia from using the name of the country in the future to ask Greece to make territorial claims since ancient times.

From this example, we can also see that the name is not small at all, and it must not be sloppy. Therefore, the British must have said that East Prussia was renamed Israel, and naturally they knew the meaning of the strings and songs, so they naturally had to be more vigilant.

However, Israel is not the most troublesome of this, and the more troublesome issue is the representation of China. Nominally, the Republic of China is the legitimate government and will represent China. But this legitimate government does not actually mean scraping the power of the Kuomintang. Why? Historically and now, China's representation at the time of its accession to the United Nations was not the only one, and according to the agreement reached between the CCP, the new Republic of China was a coalition government, and the KMT and the CCP. The industrial parties share national sovereignty, but the problem is that civil war broke out soon after the peace agreement was reached, and the coalition government was effectively a mist in the water. And the civil war broke out in full force in this time and space earlier, and the civil war broke out before the Huaxia delegation participated in that San Francisco meeting.

At the Brussels Conference to discuss the establishment of the United Nations, it was not the delegation composed of the two sides of the Communist Party of China that represented Huaxia in the competition, but the unilateral delegation of the People's Party. The reason is very simple, now the Chinese T Communist Party has been scraped by the People's Party. Bandit, how can you take T to play together on this occasion when the international community is brushing your face and brushing your face?

It's just that a very slap in the face for the Scraping Kuomintang and Chiang is that the Soviet Union does not recognize this delegation of the Scraping Kuomintang!

As soon as the delegates of the countries had just sat down and the British and American delegates had finished their speeches, Radek, who was attending the meeting on behalf of the Soviet Union, opened fire on the KMT delegation: "The Soviet government questions the qualifications of the Chinese delegation, which is not the delegation of the coalition government in the previous peace agreement, but only the delegation of the Scraping People's Party, which started the civil war without authorization, and I cannot imagine that such a corrupt, dictatorial party that started the civil war without authorization can represent the will of the Chinese people." The delegation of the Scraping Democratic Party is completely unqualified to represent and should be expelled from this meeting! ”

Song Ziwen, head of the Kuomintang delegation, was immediately confused by this speech, and he really did not expect that the Soviet side would be so faceless and would drive them away as soon as he came up.

As the godfather of the Scraping People's Party, Britain and the United States naturally couldn't let the Soviet Union slap their face like this, and they definitely wanted to protect their godson, so they immediately retorted: "The Scraping People's Government is the only legitimate government in China, and its delegation is naturally qualified to represent the wishes of the Chinese people. ”

It's just that the Soviet Union didn't accept this set, and Radek asked rhetorically: "Has the U.S. government recognized that the relevant agreement signed by the two sides on the peaceful establishment of a coalition government is invalid?" If this agreement is still valid, then I ask, what about the representatives of the Communist Party? I would also like to ask if this so-called delegation was sent by the coalition government? If not, then they are not eligible to stay at the venue! ”

Of course, the Americans will not admit that what they said before was not enough, and they can only blame the diggers for saying good things to the Kuomintang: "In view of the current actual situation in China, the coalition government has not been established for various reasons, but Huaxia, as an important member of the allies, is qualified to join this meeting, and they cannot be excluded for some minor reasons!" ”

Radek retorted again: "No one wants to exclude Huaxia, what we are excluding is a dictatorial party that cannot represent the will of the Chinese people at all, and the Kuomintang is not qualified to represent Huaxia alone at the meeting, and the representation of Huaxia belongs to all the people of Huaxia. The main party, and now the Scrape People's Party is unilaterally depriving the other people. The legitimate rights and interests of the main political party. Based on this, they are not eligible to stay at this meeting! ”

Obviously, the Soviet Union and Britain and the United States could not discuss this issue, and Britain and the United States said that the Scraping People's Party could have it, but the Soviet Union said that the Scraping People's Party could not have it unilaterally. In this way, the possibility of Zhang Zhang has just begun to be closed.

At this time, the British and Americans were so angry that they issued an ultimatum: "Either accept the representatives of the Scraping People's Party, or this meeting will not be opened!" ”

Perhaps in the eyes of Britain and the United States, there is no reason for the Soviet Union to support the T Communist Party so stubbornly, as long as sufficient pressure is exerted, the Soviets will "accept it when they see it". However, they once again underestimated the determination of the Soviet Union, and when the Americans issued an ultimatum, under the leadership of the Soviet Union, the delegations of Poland, Germany, Denmark, the Norwegian Federation, Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Romania, Greece and other countries directly announced their withdrawal from the meeting.

In this way, things will make a big fuss, because among the remaining votes, although there are giants like Britain, the United States and France, the other little brothers are really not talking, and without the participation of the Soviet Union and Eastern European blocs, what executive power does this United Nations have?

This was a great setback for Britain and the United States, and they had to take a step back and ask the Soviet Union how they could return to the conference. The demands of the Soviet side were simple: "The Kuomintang has no qualifications or power to unilaterally represent China, and must have other people, including the Communist Party. Representatives of the main party attended the meeting, and Huaxia's voting rights were exercised by this multi-party joint delegation. ”

Is this an excessive request? It should be said that it is not an exaggeration at all, and there are always some people in later generations who think that the T Communist Party only joined the United Nations in 1971, which is completely wrong. At that time, Huaxia was represented at the San Francisco Conference by a joint delegation, including the People's Party, the Communist Party of the T, and other Democratic Parties. The main party accounts for one-third each. In other words, the Communist Party of China is also one of the founding members of the United Nations, and naturally enjoys all the legitimate rights and interests in the United Nations. Therefore, in 1971, the Communist Party of China did not rejoin the United Nations, but resumed its legitimate rights and interests in the United Nations. This is very important!

And now Britain and the United States see that the conference will not be able to be held at all without this step, and the Soviet Union is only asking for the restoration of the Turkish Republic and the rest of the Chinese people. The legal representation of the main party does not say that it will drive out the Scraping the People's Party and hand over the representation to the T Communist Party. This result is completely acceptable.

After some urgent discussions, the Scraping People's Party delegation was temporarily shut out of the venue, while the Republican and other Chinese Democratic Party members. Representatives of the main party left for a meeting in Brussels.

Looks like this problem has been solved satisfactorily? Hehe, it's not that simple, the problem of Huaxia's representation has been solved, but please note that Huaxia is not an ordinary member of the United Nations, but one of the five hooligans. The five hooligans have great privileges, and the representative of which family has the veto power can also break the brain!

For the Scraping People's Party and Chiang someone, "let" the T Communists and other people. It is already a great gift for the main party to participate in the conference, and how can these turtles still want to share the biggest privilege? Therefore, Jiang believes that voting rights naturally belong to the People's Party!

It's a pity that this is just the wishful thinking of Jiang someone, and the representation of Huaxia is one-third by the representatives of the three parties, and naturally the voting rights are also one-third each, and it is impossible for you to scrape the Kuomintang to have the final say.

In this way, things froze again, anyway, Jiang someone is dead and alive and does not agree to let the people of the republic. The main party has the right to vote, and even if the godfather US imperialist himself goes out to do the work to persuade him. In this way, Truman was also angry, and simply put forward a resolution: "In view of the fact that the current state of civil war in China is no longer able to fulfill the relevant obligations in the Security Council, China will be deprived of its voting rights before China ends the civil war and returns to peace!" ”

Of course, this does not mean that the Americans really want to deprive Huaxia of its voting rights, in fact, it is more of a gesture, that is, to put pressure on Chiang to force him to make concessions. However, what Truman did not expect was that the Soviet Union immediately raised its hand to express its high approval of this proposal, and then Britain and France also agreed with it, so this proposal was adopted. As a result, Huaxia temporarily lost its voting rights.

This change caught Jiang off guard, and of course the T Communist Party was also very surprised, and in the face of the T Communists' questioning, Li Xiaofeng replied as follows: "The Soviet government does not want to deprive China of the legitimate rights and interests that it should enjoy. Rather, it is a decision that has to be made for the time being based on reality. The Soviet government promised that once the civil war in China ended, it would immediately promote the restoration of China's legitimate rights and interests! ”

Note that Li Xiaofeng's decision was deliberate, because it may seem advantageous to retain Huaxia's voting rights for the time being, but in fact it is disadvantageous. With the urine nature of Britain and the United States, even if the T Communist Party wins, it will not recognize that the T Communist Party will exercise the legitimate power of the Security Council on behalf of China. At that time, they will still say that the coalition government and the People's Party have one-third of the voting rights, and it is possible to set up a government-in-exile of the People's Party in the United States, so will it become two Chinas? This is extremely unfavorable to Huaxia. How to get rid of this problem? The best way to do this is to temporarily remove Huaxia from voting, and then restore it after the Chinese civil war is over and the KMT is eliminated. That way there will be no follow-up troubles.

And in order to achieve this step, Li Xiaofeng has also begun to make preparations in advance, for example, in the resolution to deprive Huaxia of its voting rights, there is a clause on the restoration of China's voting rights in the future -- with the consent of a simple majority of the United Nations General Assembly, Huaxia's voting rights can be restored. This article is quite important, because in history, the United States has set up many obstacles in this regard, and even had to go around the Security Council at one point. And now that I have made notes in advance, I have saved myself from these troubles.

Of course, a simple majority in the UN General Assembly is not so easy to obtain, and I am afraid it will take a lot of effort. However, this is also the only way for a big country, and if you can't even do this simple thing, then you really can't be called an international hooligan...... (To be continued.) )