Lenin was really at the end of his rope this time, since the first edition of Lenin's Complete Works was seen by the tutor, his body immediately collapsed, the motivation to persevere has been extinguished, his lifelong wish has basically been realized, and now he really needs a long rest. Pen, fun, and www.biquge.info

At the end of the conference, the tutor heard that Li Xiaofeng was elected president of the Soviet Union and the military. After the news of the chairman, he closed his eyes forever. After hearing this bad news, Li Xiaofeng was also very uncomfortable, he had mentioned many times that he had a different kind of feelings for the mentor, the mentor was not only his leader but also his father and teacher, and now that the mentor was gone, Li Xiaofeng felt like he had lost his relatives.

Soon, Li Xiaofeng personally took command of the establishment of the Comrade Lenin Funeral Committee, which he personally took the lead in, with Trotsky and Sverdlov as deputy leaders, and the older generation of revolutionaries who were still alive in the Soviet Union almost appeared on the stage. For the Soviet Union, the aftermath of the Mentor was absolutely a top priority.

In accordance with Lenin's last wishes, his body will be sparked and buried under the red wall. Although there are also some old revolutionaries who demand that Lenin's body be preserved, they are all euphemistically dissuaded by Li Xiaofeng, and Lenin's spirit will live on forever, but Lenin's body does not need to be treated like this, it is too inhumane!

Lenin's death not only shook the entire Soviet Union and the entire communist camp, but also shook the whole world, whether it was the United States or the United Kingdom, as long as it was a country with a head and a face, all sent special envoys to Moscow to mourn. Many of them may not like Lenin, but no one can deny his influence on Russia and the world, and the revolution he advocated really changed the world.

In the end, millions of people paid their respects to Lenin, and people from all over the Soviet Union flocked to the capital, all wanting to give the old man a final ride. Lenin's coffin was chaired by Li Xiaofeng and other new politicians. The Standing Committee of the Governance Bureau carried out the Kremlin, and at that moment the crying resounded around Red Square, which lasted for a long time.

For more than a month, the whole Soviet Union was immersed in grief, Lenin was almost a symbol of the Soviet Union and this era, his sudden departure made people's hearts empty, people are not used to the existence of Lenin, and they always feel not so relieved.

The only good news for Li Xiaofeng was that Lenin had persisted until the end of the congress, and if Lenin had left before the congress, the impact and shock would have been even more significant.

In May 1950, after 33 years of waiting, Li Xiaofeng finally ascended to the throne of the supreme power core of the Soviet Union. A superpower with a population of nearly 200 million people weighed on his shoulders, and in the next dozen years he would shoulder the burden of leading the Soviet Union forward, which was a heavy burden to tell the truth.

Because Li Xiaofeng has too many problems to solve, economic reform must continue, structural reform must be carried out, he still has to face intricate ethnic and religious contradictions, and more importantly, the United States, another superpower, is still wielding knives and guns on the side of the couch, and all these things need to be solved by him.

So where will Li Xiaofeng start? Some comrades may want to say that we must abandon the old routine of the planned economy before moving the economy, otherwise the Soviet Union will inevitably end up in a dead end. This may be true, but it's not the best choice.

Of course, economic problems are the most important matter, and this has a bearing on the national economy and the people's livelihood, but the solution to the problems existing in the economy must not be solved overnight, and what Li Xiaofeng wants to carry out is a gradual reform rather than a sudden change, and the former is more moderate and prudent, and is more suitable for the current situation in the Soviet Union.

Why? Because after nearly 20 years of development, the Soviet Union has become accustomed to the model of a planned economy, which is not to say that it is deeply rooted, but it certainly has a broad mass base. Everyone is accustomed to this model, not to mention how good life is under this model, but basically there is no need for food and clothing, everyone has food, clothing, and housing, maybe these three cannot be compared with the capitalist middle class, but it is still a hundred times stronger than the era of Tsarist Russia, and the lower classes of the people are satisfied with such a life, and if you rashly tell them that you want to change, it will definitely cause turmoil, and the last thing the Soviet Union needs now is turmoil.

In Li Xiaofeng's view, the best reform is to make spring breeze and rain moisturize things silently, no need to shout loudly, no need to blow the conch, and it is best to complete the change unconsciously. Of course, this ideal state of affairs never exists, because when a country needs to make changes, it is often very dangerous times, and such times require bold and drastic means to change, and it is not possible to use drastic measures.

However, Li Xiaofeng believes that the Soviet Union has not yet reached that point, and that the Soviet Union at this time is still enjoying the dividends of the Great Leap Forward in the productive forces brought about by the highly centralized planned economy, and this dividend will be eaten away in the late 50s and early 60s according to the laws of history. And now it is still at the peak of dividends, and by the end of the fifties, after crossing this peak, it will begin to decline.

Ancient Chinese books say that it is more difficult to control peace than chaos, and what Li Xiaofeng has to face is the situation of peace, most people still do not see the danger, naturally there is no motivation to change, at this time forcing the bull's head will only have the opposite effect. Therefore, overly drastic reform measures are not appropriate, and they have to be taken step by step.

Therefore, within this five years, Li Xiaofeng will not make drastic changes to the economic structure, but will throw out some bait-like reform measures, such as allowing small-scale private economies to emerge, such as small commodity economies or something. Let's inject a little fresh blood into the previously rigid field of small commodity flows, because the current Soviet model is really bad in this regard.

For housewives in the Soviet Union, the most troublesome thing was to buy daily necessities, firewood, rice, oil, salt, sauce, vinegar, tea, these things were all supplied according to the head of the Soviet Union, and if you have money, you can't buy things without supply tickets. But the supply of the Soviet Union has always been in short supply, which means that you have to queue up to buy anything, and if you go late, then come early tomorrow and queue up! What the? You said that you are waiting for the rice to be put in the pot at home, sorry for not being accommodating, this national plan stipulates, who told you not to come to the queue earlier?

There are so many political jokes in the Soviet Union about this, and the common people are really disgusted with this egg-hurting supply system, but why has there been no major change? The reason is very simple, it is only the common people who suffer, and it is never difficult for the privileged class of bureaucrats to open the back door casually and buy things.

Therefore, there is always a misunderstanding about the reform thing, always thinking that it is the people who want to change, this Nima is not nonsense, the small people cannot decide the country's major plans and policies at all, and it is always the elites who can make decisions. And it is precisely the elites that need to change, because the common people have always been passively obedient, they have always been in a weak position, and the elites in a strong position are whatever they say. The distribution of the benefits of the whole country is in the hands of the elites, not the common people.

In such an asymmetrical situation, what reforms can ordinary people decide? Let's put it this way, reform is the redistribution of the established benefit cake, and in this cake, how much can the people share? It is often when it is time for reform, when there is always a huge gap between the rich and the poor in society, and a small part of the population is full of oil, and the vast majority is struggling. That is to say, the object of reform is definitely not the common people, but the small number of people who smell wine and meat in Zhumen, and they must snatch the cake from their mouths and give a little more to the ordinary people. This is the right way to reform.

If the target of the reform is to the common people, who are already living a relatively difficult life, then this is not called reform, it is called robbery and scraping. The most typical example of this is the ticket exchange measure in India in later generations. That really is a red fruit scraping operation. The exchange of old banknotes for new banknotes suddenly does not say, and only gives a very short exchange time, and it is worth vigorously spitting out just that citizens go to the bank to exchange with their identity certificates.

Why? Perhaps in the eyes of many comrades, there is no problem with this, but the cemetery is engaged in money exchange in the name of cracking down on corruption and tax evasion, and it is just trying to force out those black money of unknown origin. There's nothing wrong with legitimately redeeming your credentials!

There is a situation in this world called correct procedure and substantive error, and this is the case with the way cemeteries are arranged. Because India is a very special country, it can be said that most of the more than a billion people are illiterate, this is really not a joke, although India's own official data is 20 to 30 percent illiteracy rate (just this data is very scary), but this data has no meaning, because what is the standard of illiteracy is not easy to define, to put it mildly, India's illiteracy standard is really quite low, can write their own name in 26 letters in India can not be counted as illiterate. This standard is outrageously low, if calculated according to normal standards, there are at least seven or eight billion illiterate people in India, which means that the illiteracy rate in India is likely to be more than 60%!

Some comrades may be asking again, what does illiteracy have to do with what you said before? Don't worry, take your time, because illiteracy is very painful, it is very simple, illiterate to apply for all kinds of documents is quite painful, you can't fill in all kinds of forms, you are likely to not apply for valid documents, without valid documents you can't go to the bank to open an account, and unable to go to the bank to open an account means that you can't legally exchange the old money for the new money.

Speaking of which, everyone should understand in seconds. For a large number of low-level Indians, it is naturally impossible to have a bank account without identity documents, so they cannot exchange money at all in this round of urgent exchange of old banknotes. It is equivalent to saying that the little hard-earned money they had worked hard to accumulate before was "evaporated". Isn't this equivalent to scraping a layer of ground?

Some comrades may say that the cemetery is really effective in combating corruption, tax evasion and money laundering, right? I'm afraid it's hard to say what kind of corruption, tax evasion and money laundering basically has nothing to do with the grassroots people in India, who don't have the ability. It is precisely the elites of India who have the ability to do this, and only they can be corrupt, tax evasion and money laundering. And it may be difficult for the cemetery's money exchange law to crack down on them.

Because this group of people basically controls the national economy and people's livelihood in India, it is easy for them to pass on the old money in their hands to those poor grassroots people, very simply, when the people buy things, they can choose to only accept the new money but only give the old money when they give change, either accept or you can't buy anything. In this way, ordinary people have to constantly go to the bank to queue up to change banknotes, and there are scenes that are happy to see on the news.

But then again, the third brother's endurance is really non-human, and the common people of other countries would have rebelled a long time ago when they encountered this kind of blatant robbery, but the most they did was to commit suicide in protest, which is really strange.

Speaking of which, some comrades are going to refute again, didn't the opinion poll in India say that 80 or 90 percent of the citizens were satisfied with the exchange of money? Aren't you talking nonsense? The only thing that can be said about this is that opinion polls in the United States still show that Hillary Clinton will be elected! Who was the last to take the stage?

The so-called public opinion polls, many times under the guise of the so-called polling companies that are responsible for this work, can spot check specific samples and come up with specific data as long as you pay for them. Even their survey questions can be full of guidance, and if you follow their set of test questions, you will fall into the pit before you know it. So don't take this thing too seriously, just listen to it.

In short, what happened in India can really only be described as a cheat, the problem is that many of the so-called reforms in this world are cheated in the end, because those rulers want to make changes, but they are not willing to hurt the interests of vested interest groups too much, the cake is always so big, and in the end, the people will suffer.

From the perspective of maintaining stability and promoting unity, it is necessary to safeguard the interests of the broadest masses of the people, and as mentioned earlier, the broadest masses are always the disadvantaged groups, and it takes not only courage to defend the rights of the disadvantaged groups, but also ideas, strength and skill.

So let's take a look at Li Xiaofeng's current situation, does he have this idea? If you don't have an idea, what kind of reform can you talk about? It's really not too simple for an immortal to want to mess around. And what about courage? This one definitely has. Does he have the power to see again? He said that there was power, but please note that the Bolsheviks were always under collective leadership, and it was not up to any one person to speak, at least in this time and space. Therefore, if Li Xiaofeng wants to reform, he must first win the broadest support and obtain sufficient strength, in fact, this is the so-called wrist...... (To be continued.) )