Today, I chatted with my friends in the author group, and some thoughts came to my heart. It's a cliché to be honest, it's about piracy.

In fact, Dongliu also knows that it is useless to open a single chapter to say this. Piracy, a problem that cannot be solved even by nine years of compulsory education, is unlikely to change because of my short article.

But some words are like a fish in the throat, not spitting out unpleasant!

After gossiping, the next official revelation is made. Non-combatants are asked to be accompanied by a parent.

Declare in advance that I will not scold people in this text, let alone spit fragrantly, everyone will lay out the facts and be reasonable. Ask my readers to monitor it.

I believe a lot of words, everyone else must have seen it in the single chapters of other authors, Dongliu is not sure that his writing must be better than them, and he will speak more well than them, so he directly skips those criticisms and goes directly to the topic.

In recent years, I've been seeing people complaining, why are there fewer and fewer good-looking ones now?

In fact, I would say that it is not the author who determines the development of the Internet, but the reader.

What is the data that authors pay most attention to when they are creating?

It's a subscription!

The change of subscription is enough to affect an author's creative ideas and direction, which is the most critical link between readers and authors, and it is usually the most neglected by readers.

If you don't believe me, you can read the last chapter of the eunuch book, or the one that completes the testimonials. Putting aside all kinds of nonsense and weirdness, what is the reason why the author cuts the book the most?

It's because the book collapsed.

What do you mean it's collapsed?

Chase down to a certain extent, break through the author's mental defense, and collapse when the defense is broken!

In the normal writing process, how do the authors constantly adjust the outline and design the plot?

Look at the data, look at the follow-up.

When a certain plot is updated, it is found that the reading has risen or fallen sharply, which is often the time when the authors' little hearts are the most nervous.

It has risen, which means that this paragraph is well written. Sum up the experience, continue to work hard, and strive to make a better play on the basis of this paragraph next time, so that readers (genuine readers) love to watch this. In the future, I will not only continue to write like this, but also carry it forward and renovate it on the basis of the original.

fell, indicating that there was a problem with this plot, and the subsequent plot must be adjusted as soon as possible.

There's nothing to say, immediately re-examine the plot, check the super thunder points and poison points, even if you can't get better, find other authors with good relationships to help you take a look, you must find it out, and then try to save and make up for it as much as possible.

Because this point, in the author's opinion, is poison and thunder, and it must be solved. Even if it can't be solved, it will depend on pulling the plot back with the follow-up plot, and then never make the same mistakes again.

What if this poison point is important for the subsequent development of the plot?

Changed the follow-up plot!

What if it has a profound impact on the outline?

Change the outline!

This is a true portrayal of the strongest ecological connection that the author interacts with the reader.

Leaving aside the very few cases of penchant for death, proportionally, this is the pattern of interaction between the author and the reader.

As for those cases, there is no need to discuss them at all, and there is a good saying that individual cases can never refute proportionality.

In this closed-loop model, the author will not consider the feelings of pirated readers, just as pirated readers will not consider the feelings of authors.

Therefore, why do some people feel that there are fewer and fewer good-looking ones?

The answer is: because there are fewer genuine readers who like your ideal good book than the full-page readers of the mainstream now.

Don't think that pirated and genuine readers like the same thing, in fact, the two are not the same. It's as if some readers will come to support the genuine version, while others will run to see the pirated version.

The fact is that readers can vote with their feet, choosing whether to support the genuine or go to piracy, and authors will also vote with their hands to try to write something that pleases the genuine readers.

As for pirated readers...... Hehe! Who cares if you watch it or not?

If you are a person who really likes the Internet, and you want the Internet to develop in the direction you want, then please start with me and support the genuine version.

Don't use money as an excuse anymore, now start all kinds of activities, and give away valuable coins, which can be used to subscribe and reward authors. At the end of each chapter, there is a red envelope option, and you can watch the advertisement to pick up the coins. All kinds of gifts add up, and chasing two or three daily updates is definitely not a problem.

If you don't even want to delay this little time, then don't complain about how the Internet is written to your heart.

Because you have given up on participating in this game of interaction between the author and the reader, it makes sense that your opinion is ignored by the author.

Speaking of which, it seems to me that the online creation environment has actually improved in the past few years. After all, a niche author like me can still have enough to eat.

This shows that readers' awareness of authenticity and appreciation are steadily improving. Not to mention that it's better than before, at least it's become more diverse, and it can feed more authors.

If we can continue to develop along a benign track, I believe that the future of online literature will be better.

Well, that's all I have to say.

After all, my dream is here. As long as the sky doesn't fall, we must continue to persevere.

I really hope that the network will not decline like the once glorious domestic stand-alone games, right?

Speaking of which, some readers may not know that twenty years ago, domestic stand-alone games had teams and works that were no less than those in Europe, the United States, and Japan, but ...... It is because of piracy that only various kryptonite mobile games are flooding the market now.

A clip of "Black Myth Wukong" can make many players feel excited. As everyone knows, if it weren't for the scourge of piracy, players might now be able to play one or even several domestic "Black Myth Wukong" every year.

Finally, I wish all my genuine readers:

Many happy returns!

Good luck!

Excellent grades!

Works well!

Money!

Happy Love!

Family happiness!

Balabala......