By the time I wrote three hundred and fifteen chapters, the content had almost been written, and the big hole dug in front had actually been almost filled.

The pit related to Roland's personal is the actor growth plan made when he saw "Spider-Man" from the beginning, and this plan peaked at the time of "Titanic", because all the popularity and influence were swallowed up by the co-branded brand.

Besides......

Actually, I don't really write much about entertainment at all.

It's not a copyist, there is no system, it's all up to Bill Murray in "Groundhog Day", who finds his own path in life after a continuous cycle, and the advantage in this case is actually only prophetic.

What's more, I say something unpleasant from my personal standpoint and not as an author-

Desperately emphasizing that 'content is king', that is, forcibly feeding poisonous chicken soup.

Because in the entertainment field, content can never be king.

The content is a younger brother.

Hollywood now emphasizes that content is king every year, saying that Disney kills everything, but what they say about content is king, referring to the competition under equal status, the competition between Disney and Warner, Paramount, Universal, and Sony, not Hollywood's first, second and third tier companies to see who makes more awesome movies.

The relationship between the second- and third-tier companies and the first-line is the relationship between the grandson and the grandfather.

This gap cannot be solved through high-quality content, let alone by throwing money at it, unless-

Those who have a lot of money can buy the current big five.

Why?

Because of the channel.

The importance of channels, I think there are few people who don't know the importance of entertainment now, but what I want to say is that if you miss 1980, you will forever miss the opportunity to be promoted to the front line just by development.

Because before 1980, Hollywood giants had not laid global channels in large quantities, but after 1980, they spent money frantically to fill this market in just four years.

What does this mean by being full?

Andrew Kripps, former chairman of United International Pictures, said, "Since 1985, the screening criteria of the six green light committees of Hollywood have added preferences and characteristics of foreign markets, including dialogues that may offend a group of people, including scenes that are not liked by certain countries, including the appearance of some actors." ”

To take the most obvious example, the style of Disney animation has changed significantly before and after.

In '85, they've been studying the preferences of audiences in various countries.

And what does this possession bring them?

Monopolize.

Lionsgate, for example, bet on so many movies, but they still can't get into the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA).

Because they don't have channels, the Big Six don't allow them to make channels.

Until 17 years of "Fast Attack", Lionsgate was still looking for Warner to distribute it for them, and after the box office share was suppressed, they chose to do it themselves, and then ...... Their movies are basically R-rated.

It's actually a very simple truth.

Do you want to do funnels?

OK.

But we can make your moviegoers smaller.

Movies are graded before they are released, and the main members of the MPAA are the presidents and presidents of Disney, Sony, Paramount, Universal, Warner, Netflix (new), you take a movie, we rate it R.

You go and put it on......

You go to the exit......

A single movement of your fingers can grind you to death.

And this is just their first move.

The ensuing public opinion blockade, the virtual "Paramount Act", can make your movie impossible to meet the public at all.

So after 1980, even if you make three movies a year and win the top three at the global box office, it will only be reduced to a life of being acquired, and there is no gap to survive, as long as you start to acquire the first overseas distribution company, the big six have already begun to group shamelessly, in the past 35 years, they don't know how many self-righteous cow beeps have been crushed, in fact, they are a stupid beep company, and all the crushing is started by those companies in the acquisition of the first overseas company.

There is no such thing as a monopoly of this kind of monopoly.

As long as you dare to step the red line, the Big Six will already start sniping.

And it won't give you experience, it's a total blockade as soon as it comes up.

Label your movie as R-rated, your own media will not accept advertisements, and the theater chain will be divided into crazy oppression......

That's why I didn't let Roland go crazy making movies.

Cow beep in front of people, stupid beep after people.

Content is king, you can only let others buy you quickly.

The point is that it's not the channels that will kill you, but the movie ratings and the North American theater alliance that stands with the Big Six.

Of course, these two points are rarely written by authors, I have read entertainment articles for so many years, and they are really the same as reality, as soon as they come up, they use movie classification and cinemas to reduce dimensionality, and the only one who crushes the protagonist is "Long Live the Director".

As a result, film became Roland's industry, not his core industry.

As a result, the proportion of movies in the book will gradually decrease as it develops.

After talking about Roland's personal pit, what I want to talk about next is career.

Also when he got 'Spider-Man', what Roland wanted to do, that is, the tone of the book, appeared-

Disney.

And it is completely impossible to kill a Hollywood Big Six, just through movies.

Because apart from influence, movies can't compare to any profession.

Just like Disney's counterpart, Time Warner, the movie is a number to them.

Their annual game income can support the unlimited loss of the film industry.

That's right, Time Warner also makes games, in addition to "Batman", "Injustice", "Middle-earth War", "Middle-earth", "Mad Max", "Mortal Kombat" is also theirs, not to mention Lego's DC series, Lego's Marvel series, Star Wars series, and Jurassic series are also released by them!

You must know that in the 17-year Q4 financial report released by Time Warner in 18, the official directly said that "the big sales of the game "Middle-earth: Shadow Mordor" offset the decline in movie revenue'!

Just the annual financial report does not need to be specifically marked, and even a game department that is not worthy of being a business group can offset the loss of the film and television department.

Not to mention that Time Warner also has a bunch of high-quality assets that can be profitable, such as cable media, print media, and Major League Baseball's Atlanta Braves (acquired by Liberty Media Group in '09).

Comcast, the second largest Internet service provider in the United States, also benchmarked against Disney, and in 04 they wanted to spend 66 billion yuan to acquire Disney, and the subsequent acquisition of Universal was also a more influential publicity tool for them.

As for Disney, you can say that it is a media company, a real estate company, but you can't say that it is an entertainment company.

They are just more famous for their IP, and the real source of income is still the media network, more than forty percent, and the remaining theme park resorts are nearly thirty percent or five, and entertainment is less than twenty percent, and they have been hovering between fifteen and eighteen......

As for the derivatives brought by entertainment, they are all below 10 percent.

Disney's repeated statement that the content is king, and the surroundings are invincible.

But people still rely on channels to eat.

Not to mention littleBits, GoPro, Epic Games, etc., Disney is involved.

Disney may be the most like an entertainment giant among the five, but in the entire group, the total proportion of entertainment is less than 30%, in addition to theme parks and resorts, civilian real estate, is also their source of money.

Uxman Real Estate is just one of the real estate companies owned by Disney.

Just as Sony's best beep is finance and semiconductors, Hollywood companies are rooted in Hollywood, and all they want is influence.

If you really only target Hollywood, you will be pressed to the ground by the other party.

Do you think that the most awesome thing about people is entertainment, and people will take off their clothes and tell you-

I'm sorry, but you're targeting our entire group's garbage business.

It's like making mineral water, thinking that it's all over if you beat Cestbon.

Cestbon can tell you that China Resources Land, China Resources Pharmaceutical, China Resources Gas, and China Resources Finance are my big brothers......

Therefore, Roland, who wants to kill Disney, is involved in various fields.

When he finds out that he can kill Sony, he will not hesitate to go under the knife.

To be honest, I personally feel that there is no problem with my layout, and I even dare to say that my brain hole can not only have a sense of reality and operation, but also fully conform to the crushing routine of Shuangwen.

But to my surprise, when I wrote this plot, my grades fell off a cliff.

I didn't poison it!

Reality doesn't need to talk about logic, but there must be logic, I think my whole set of operating logic is fine!

At every step, I can fish out a bunch of real-life cases for you, why is this unscientific?

I'm puzzled.

As for some criticisms, I said that there are too many explanatory words.

I admit it, but after thinking about it, I really can't change it.

Take 'Gilead' as an example, if I don't write about 'Gilead' clearly, how many people know that 'Gilead' has a leg with the military-industrial complex? How many companies know that this is the former Secretary of Defense of America?

I don't write 'Tier II', I just write 'Henry Rumsfeld' agree, how many people know that 'Henry Rumsfeld' uses the 'Black Hawk incident' as a rhetoric to promote the American Global Hawk program?

I'll just write that 'Black Hawk Down' can kill Sony, and I don't explain the operation mode of 'Long-Arm Jurisdiction', isn't the plot of stabbing Sony to death very abrupt? Why did Sony have to die when he shot 'Black Hawk Down'?

If I don't write 'US-Japan trade war', how many people will go to the analysis and enlightenment of the US-Japan trade war written by our Ministry of Commerce more than ten years ago? How many people know that Sony's right to speak was knocked out by the trade war?

Personally, I don't want to write these explanatory texts, because I have a concept, but I have to look up the information again when I write it, and I'm afraid that I will get the order wrong for this timeline, but ......

Subscriptions don't panic.

Compared with stabbing Sony to death three times, Stallion Wen is more popular.

Now that I've written it all here, I'll say one more thing.

Those who say that I am maliciously controlled, where am I controlled.

Didn't I say that before?

My favorite is Scarlett Johansson.

But women weren't my starting point for writing this book at all......

In fact, these words should have been sent after writing the Oscar plot last month.

But I didn't write it at the time.,First, I'm not at home.,I really don't have time.,Second, it's fourteen days after my special code.,The subscription has dropped miserably.,Plus the plot that followed by the stabbing of Sony.,So it dragged on until now.。

To put it simply, this is called making amends, but to put it mildly, it is too late.

And to be honest, I don't think I've had a problem with my arrangement, but I miscalculated the market for hardcore plots.

As for those who say I have the wrong title.

The title of the book is really correct.

The editor suggested that I call it 'Los Angeles 1990,' but I didn't choose because the purpose of the book was to kill Disney.

There are also claims that I carry private goods and deliberately smear them.

When I submitted the outline to the editor last year, I did have concerns about that.

Because I didn't have any books in this style before this, I wouldn't be able to get sprayed to death.

But now, am I smearing, or are you washing the floor?

Well, three thousand four hundred words have been typed out at this point.

I've pretty much talked about what I want to talk about.

One last word.

Talking about my water, I'm only left with an outline now.

At first, there was a political line, but before it could be written, it was killed.

I once wrote an explanation when I met the governor, and it turned out that the explanation was also killed, and I don't know if there is still one on the D version.

Since I won't be allowed to open it at the beginning, I simply won't write it.

Everything is currently in the service of the main story, and the next book is actually left with a big plot.

It's just that this big plot is more complicated than killing Sony.

That's it.