This morning's physical examination, other indicators did not come out, but at the same time, the doctor also said that I have problems with my cervical spine and lumbar spine, and helped me make an appointment for the rehabilitation department in the afternoon, and there is a high probability that it will be gone today.

Anyway, I sent a single chapter to ask for leave, and I can't code many words at this time at noon, so continue to chatter a few more words.

First of all, thank you for maintaining my readers, I haven't seen the book review area for two days, thank you for your support, the same, under the name of apprenticeship, it doesn't matter if you find faults, but I can't accept it when I come up with the fragrance, you say that I don't write well, I write dry, water, there are problems, I won't delete these, but you write and say hello, I'm not used to it.

Secondly, there was a book review on the 23rd, and the reader said that I didn't have a main line, and I thought about it for a few days, but I didn't find that my book didn't have a main line.

The title of this book is "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood", not a director, an actor, or an entertainment era, the main line of traditional entertainment literature will definitely not exist, brush the box office and win the big three, and win the Oscars, these things are not the root of this book at all.

What is the main thread of this book?

Isn't it a shortcut to summarize in one sentence?

Compared with those protagonists who think acting is the most important, this book is not a chilling performance at all, because in Roland's eyes, the profession of actor is just a tool.

I've been writing, Roland likes commercial films, not art films, why?

The reason is clearly written in the text, the movie is the filmmaker's business, but it will never be the filmmaker's business alone.

Whether a movie is a big hit or not has a certain relationship with the content of the movie itself, but what really puts the movie on the altar is the environment, as well as the thousands of people, or in other words, those who hope that the millions of people like the movie.

Here's the simplest and most recent example:

"Saving Private Ryan", eight saves one; This year, save the city first, then save people.

Irony not?

Do you really think how noble Hollywood is, pursuing acting skills and sublimation?

A movie made by Martin Scorsese and Disney with Brad Pitt's ...... Isn't it 404 to now?

Mel Gibson just wants to shoot something 'cool', and now?

After I finished writing Mel Gibson last month, this guy got caught again.

Why?

bought a murder ex-wife, and it turned out to be directly bought on the head of the FBI.

Isn't this kind of news ridiculous?

Mel Gibson can't play these guys.

On February 23, 2005, the French newspaper Le Figaro published a long dialogue between former French President Giscard d'Estaing and Erik Izralevich, deputy director of the editorial department of Les Echos, about development, in which he said that he is not an exporter of values.

Then the thigh king held by the small steel cannon commented on this report, after the economy and military, it is the export of values in the cultural field.

Hollywood is the export of values.

And the main line of my article is how to get the first pot of gold on the road of value output, and then continue to develop?

In the field of value export, there is no self-made, even those film critics who are extremely fair have their own criticism positions.

In this way, it's not interesting for me to write about copying future movies.

Following the general trend and picking up leaks with thick thighs against your back is the main line of this article.

As soon as the article appeared, thirty years in Hedong and thirty years in Hexi, don't bully the poor youth?

Well, Mel Gibson in front and Megan Fox in the back.

The so-called free speech is just that you can only say what I want to hear.

As a result, some readers said that I had not changed anything about the protagonist.

Isn't Roland changing everything?

He changed himself, he changed the landscape, and he changed the world.

I know a lot of people want to see the kind of heads-up Hollywood, but with all due respect, I can't really write about it.

A lot of tech companies don't say you can invest if you want to.

Why did Google dare to bypass Wall Street and conduct an initial public offering in the form of an auction.

Because at that time, among the shareholders who invested in them, there was an organization called the CIA.

That's right, the CIA has an investment institution under its name.

I think "Chicago 1990" is very well written, not because I like to watch his emotional soap opera, but because the villain is very well portrayed.

Because the self-made guy is successful, there will be countless companies that want to swallow you.

Even Michael Jackson's can't win, because these companies control public opinion.

And many times the cow beep of a company is not that they have mastered advanced technology, but that the friends around them can help them kill the guys on the same running line.

Just like Yang Zhiyuan I wrote in the past two days, if Microsoft's acquisition fails, then he has to get out.

If a self-made guy can't find a backer, there are too many ways to kill them.

Many times you hold the thighs of the big guy, in fact, not for better development, but when you are developing, others dare not beat you.

Just like the speech of the national husband and his father at Harvard, everyone, there are people behind them.

This is the main line of this article, making a fortune in silence.

When Comrade Chuan Jianguo asked a reporter whether the rich could be tested first and the poor later when he was asked by a reporter a few days ago, the words he gave were the most sincere sentence he had heard over the years, 'This is life.' ’

Roland loves movies, but he doesn't want to be a tool.

And the best way to not want to be a tool in a place like America where the class is solidified is to beat others with your back to a tree.

Because of this, many people will find this article so boring.

Because every choice Roland makes is to frantically pick up leaks in line with the general trend.

Speaking of which, I can answer the question of the scolding apprenticeship I mentioned at the beginning.

James Cameron won't revolve around the protagonist?

Before the filming of "Titanic", the truck driver was not the king of the world.

Even with "Terminator 2", his coffee rank is still much lower than Spielberg's.

With Spielberg covered, Roland doesn't take the initiative to offend people, and people in Hollywood won't take the initiative to offend him.

Moreover, even the governor himself said that being beaten and scolded by a truck driver is a manifestation of intimacy.

Because you're a trainee, you can't see my notes.

Secondly, Spielberg's own way of acting as a person was demonstrated by Katherine Kennedy and Robert Zemeckis in the roundtable interview of "The Force Awakens".

As long as he is included in the scope of his own people, even if your request is a little excessive, people will agree.

The copyright of the "Back to the Future" series is indeed in the hands of Spielberg's Amperin, but Robert Zemeckis personally confirmed that Spielberg gave him the maximum permission, and while he was alive, everything about "Back to the Future" was decided by him, including whether to restart, he didn't want to restart, no one could restart, this was when he was still nobody, just called Spielberg teacher, Spielberg wrote it to him in the contract.

A teacher, people can give you the greatest authority.

Why didn't Roland do it when he knew about it?

As soon as you touch your mouth, the most difficult accumulation of raw capital in Hollywood can be directly filled, and if it were you, would you refuse?

I remember that I wrote about this before, but unfortunately in the author's words.

Well, I wrote more than 2,000 words on the two questions, and I will regret that I didn't take the time code word at noon.

That's it, I went out to see the waist and cervical spine, and I made an appointment until two o'clock, and I don't know how many people there are.

。