When all this is consistent with a goal of their entire team, then the next thing for them, in terms of this consistency, can they go through other ways to make it all more perfect, in fact, for them, at this time, a higher requirement is put forward.

Because from the whole point of view, if such a demand can give their own side a more reasonable demand in the whole game in this cafeteria, then such a demand can give their own side something more perfect in the later game.

In fact, for them, there are also some conscious things on their own side.

Because from their point of view at this time, if they consciously make this thing a tradition in the later game of what they need to do at the moment, then can such a tradition still be adjusted according to some of their adjustments in the whole game at this time?

So that they can clearly think that they can give them something of more concern within the current range.

And this kind of more concerned thing, if in the later stage of the game, when they can finally realize a need that they have reached in the whole game, then we can still do such a trend according to their plan in the whole game at this time, in fact, for them, and put forward a higher requirement, but also let their own side realize what kind of information and what kind of attitude they should control in the face of an improvement within this range, and what kind of attitude they should grasp, for the rhythm of their entire game, there is already some weightto the role.

Because from the perspective of an effect on their own side at this time, whether such an important thing can still be made according to their plan in the whole game at this time, in fact, for them, it is also something that their own side has consciously realized that this problem brings to their own side more reasonable.

Therefore, if we analyze the situation they have seen on their own side at present, whether such a risk can still be adjusted according to the needs they have created in the whole game at the moment is also an effect that they have realized in the face of this method.

And what they need to do in the later stage is to be in such an effect, so that they can realize that at present, if they look at the effect achieved by themselves in the whole game at this time, can such an effect still be realized according to the cognition of some directions they played in the whole game at this time? So is such an effect still possible to make a reasonable adjustment according to their needs in the human game at the moment, for them, it is also something that they need to do, so when this thing has realized that this demand thing has brought them a benefit from the whole game, So is such a profitability still according to the needs and interests that they can achieve in the whole game at this time, and make adjustments in the past two years, in fact, for them, it also gives them some more reliable needs on their side.

Therefore, in this way, whether they can continue to make a change in this way according to such a demand is actually to give their own side the ability to make some corresponding adjustments according to such a demand, so when all this is given to their own side of the game from this moment to a more reasonable arrangement, So such an arrangement, is it possible to make a corresponding adjustment according to their control in the whole game at the moment, and it has also given them enough reference on their side.

In the later stage, in the face of such a reference, how to make all this more optimized according to a reference interest at this time is actually to make some adjustments on their own side.

If in this kind of adjustment of tactics, these adjustments faced by themselves can be more effectively suppressed on their own side in the later game, then whether such a profitability can continue to be made according to a situation on their own side at this time is a better adjustment on their own side is actually a change in some ways on their own side.

And at present, in the face of such a transformation, they can continue to make all this more optimized according to some adjustment things in the whole game at the moment, so for them, At the level of optimizing performance in this way, is it possible to continue to make adaptable improvements according to a demand on their side at this time, and it is also to give their own side the ability to realize whether they can continue to do some changes in such situations in the face of a change in this way in the later stage.

Because from this point of view, if their own side can consciously make this issue more clear according to this demand in the later stage, then such a clear thing can give a reference to their own side must also be compatible with their control in the whole game at this moment.

Therefore, when such a control, can they make an adjustment according to the demand that they can achieve in the whole game at this moment, and also make their own side have the ability to play according to the current game, and within a range of their own control, at what point can they achieve?

Therefore, when they think about this problem from this point of view, whether such a problem can continue to make an adjustment on their own side according to such a demand is also the best effect that they can achieve at present. 88

Because from such an effect, they can make their own side have the ability to realize what kind of angle they should make all this more clear and clear in this way, if they have the ability to make an adjustment according to the effect achieved in the whole game at this moment, So whether such an adjustment can also allow them to do it according to their own needs in the game at the moment, such an improvement is also with some full consideration around them.

So from this point of view, if such a consideration can give a better reference to their own side in the whole game.

So is such a reference can continue to follow the effect they have achieved in the whole game at this moment, then in fact, for them, such an effect can still be based on some of the needs they have played in the whole game at the moment to make a reasonable judgment, and it is also for their own side to have the ability to realize where some of the points they need to control in this way are.

If such a point allows their own side to gradually realize such some control in the subsequent game, and at the same time they make reasonable adjustments according to such a demand, these adjustment points can really give them what kind of reference they have to make their own side have the ability to realize some needs on their side. So such a demand, can they continue to make reasonable improvements according to their final control of the whole game at this moment, and it is actually something they need to protect in this competition.

So from this point of view, such a control is also to give their own side the ability to realize what kind of way they need to make such an adjustment in the future game, because from such an adjustment, some of the improvements they can achieve on their own side also have some considerations on their own side. And then how to let them remember how many times they have such an ability in such a consideration are also some problems that they need to study on their own side.

Because if you control these points from these points, if the control of these points can reasonably be improved from some aspects of the rhythm of the whole game at this time, then an improvement in these aspects can still be adjusted according to some of the rationality of their own side in the whole game, and it is also for their own side to have the ability to make a reasonable judgment according to a requirement in this regard, so from these perspectives, The direct benefits that these judgmental things can bring to their own side are also something that they need to achieve according to their own control throughout the game at this time.

At present, if we start from such a point of prevention and control, some of their own envoys actually need to be improved relatively speaking.

Because judging from the situation of the whole game at this time, when facing some relatively strong opponents, although the cohesion shown by their own side is very high, it does not achieve the best effect in terms of the overall effect of the game, so the reason is actually that they do not have a thorough understanding of the rhythm of the whole game.

In fact, when they need to speed up the pace on their own side, this side often seems a little disjointed, because from this point of view, it was also from the whole point of view, and it was also some inclusive adjustments in the whole team that needed to be combined through some reasonable characteristics on their own side.

Because from the perspective of the whole team, there are still some differences at the level of the whole team, because there are some players in the team who have some unique advantages in understanding the game and reacting to the game.

But from these points of view, if this advantage can't give them some improvement in the next game in the whole game at this time, then such an improvement can still be adjusted according to some direction that they have made in the whole game at this moment, then this adjustment also needs their own side to realize in the following games. What kind of point do they need to use to make some optimizations around them, which is also something they need to focus on in the future games.

At present, from the analysis of these commonalities, if the effect they achieve in the later game and some of the effects they expect to do have a better adaptation on their own side, then such a profitability can still be controlled according to some of their structural aspects in the whole game at this time, but this will be made more clear, then in fact, for them, Some of the changes that they can bring out after realizing this problem can also make some reasonable adjustments on their own side.

And if such an adjustment can still be done according to some of their settings in the whole game at this time, then such a control will inevitably become something they need to focus on in the future games.

Because from the point of view of these concerns, if such a control has some reasonable changes on their own side, then for a change in this regard, whether they can still make some adjustments to their own abilities according to some needs in the whole game at the moment is actually of some key significance on their own side.

At present, from the aspect of these adjustment performance, if there is a demand that the competition can achieve, it must be a direct correlation with all this.