"20 rebounds? 5678910 caps? Do you dare to speak louder? You oriental!! "DeAndrew. Jordan heard Tang Qian's contempt and couldn't help but scold. He is not an old fritter like Duncan and Garnett, his mouth kung fu has always been very bad, and when he was slightly provoked by Tang Qian, he immediately burst a little cerebrovascular table.

Tang Qian wants this effect, when people are angry, it is easy to go to extremes, either to explode, or to fight indiscriminately. Looking at the historical process, the vast majority of people are the latter.

Little Jordan? 13+ rebounds this season? Oh? So what?

Seriously, since Tang Qian came out of the tower, he didn't feel any rebounders of this level at all.

Rodman or Chamberlain, which is not a super rebounder, a super rebounding king? 13+ rebounding king? Rob with them, and the hair can't be touched.

This is not a joke, since Tang Qian's 17+ rebounds couldn't guarantee rebounds in the tower, he didn't feel anything about the 13+14+15+ rebounding king, and he was numb. What's more, he is now himself, it is very likely that he has reached the super field of 20+ rebounds, what is this concept, this is 7 consecutive rebounds king Dennis. Rodman didn't even enter the hall.

Today, it's time to put the test to the test.

After Bryant scored consecutive goals, the Clippers began to focus on him, otherwise No. 24 is still there, who knows if he will do something crazy? But since Kobe Bryant now has the most peak version of the body, then he will not be like 05-06 and 06-07 in the past few years, just focusing on himself and rushing hard. In fact, since the beginning of the 07-08 season, Kobe Bryant has begun to fully mature, and he has truly begun to grasp what is his own key to winning.

Otherwise, with the Lakers' lineup in those years, they don't want to win consecutive championships at all.

The famous American liberal critic Bill. Simmons once said that the Lakers in that lineup, without Kobe, are a team that travels in one round and two rounds, and it is impossible to win consecutive championships without the spur of No. 24. Van Gundy was a guest at the time, and he agreed. Therefore, it is definitely not the subjective will of the Chinese people, and the United States also sees it this way.

Otherwise, that lineup, you don't have Kobe Bryant to try, just Gasol, Odom, Fisher, Ariza, and Bynum, who is not as good as Thompson of the current Cavaliers? Did you tell you could break through in the Devil's West End? Or three times in a row? Nonsense is not convincing, or it is better to go directly to the data. Throughout the history of the NBA, the only teams that can enter the Finals in a row are the Heat, Pistons, Celtics, Knicks, Bulls, Lakers, Cavaliers, Spurs, and Warriors. And in the entire Western Conference, only the Lakers, Spurs and Warriors can do it. It can be seen that it is very difficult for the West District to enter the finals. If you level up a little more and turn this consecutive Grand Final into three consecutive Grand Finals, you will find that the team is even rarer. If you only count the data from the 90s onwards, there are only the Lakers and Warriors in the Western Conference. And after a closer analysis, you can see that Kobe Bryant's 3 finals this time, the strength and difficulty of the lineup are much more difficult than the OK combination and the Super Warriors.

Even now, it seems that being able to enter three times in a row is almost a miracle.

If Bynum could have averaged 16+11 per game in the playoffs in the 2011-2012 season during that time, it would be about the same, but unfortunately during the three finals, Baihuang has not grown up, and it can even be said that there is no year than Tristan. Thompson has to be strong. It's just a matter of facts, and after Bynum increased his shots, the shooting rate was very low, and the 47.7% shooting rate at the No. 5 position was almost equal to 4 percent from the outside.

During this time, if it weren't for Kobe, do you really think the Lakers could enter the Finals three times and win two championships?

Kobe Bryant led the team in the early stage, it is indeed not good, mainly because he has no experience leading the team alone before, in fact, before Gasol came to the Lakers, Bynum was not injured, and Kobe Bryant once led the Lakers to the first place in the West. Bynum was injured before his record slipped to third and fourth place in the Western Conference. Then, it took off.

For example, just an analogy, Zhan Huang led the team in the first two years and never entered the playoffs, but without the experience of leading the team in the past two years, do you think he can become stronger and stronger in the future? The ability to lead a team is the top in history? If this is the case, James immediately put the Cavaliers into the playoffs as soon as he entered the NBA, and he only needs the playoffs, which is indeed a god. But as strong as Emperor Zhan, doesn't it also need a 2-year buffer period and a leveling period? How many years did Kobe Bryant lead the team alone? Among them, he was injured for half a season, and as soon as Gasol came, he led the team to the finals in one go, and it was still continuous. I don't dare to say that he is stronger than a monster like Zhan Huang, but he is definitely not as weak as everyone thinks. Tang Qian even always felt that if Kobe Bryant had led the team alone and leveled up alone from the beginning, his achievements and historical status would have far exceeded that of now.

Unbelief? In fact, to put it mildly, Kobe's first three championships don't matter if you want it or not, because the bonus for him is too small. For example, if he had played an average of 35+ or more minutes per game and unlimited shots at the beginning, averaging 20+ points per game in the first season would not be a problem, nor would the Rookie of the Year be a problem. The second season is definitely going to break through 20+, because Kobe Bryant only needs 11.6 shots to score 15.4 points in his second season with the Lakers, giving him 20+ shots, what do you think?

It is also necessary to consider that leading a team and leveling alone is bound to improve faster and faster for the growth of personal ability.

If he can average 25+ per game in the second year, it is already very low, after all, 11+ shots will get 15+ points, and 20+ shots above 25+ points will not be an exaggeration. And also to calculate the rapid increase in the level training time of a large number of shots. In this way, basically the All-Star and the best team 2~3 are basically stable. In the third year, with the training maniac personality of Kobe Bryant, if you give him an average of more than 35+ per game for three years to level up, his offensive ability is likely to enter the mark of approaching 30+ per game or reaching 30+ per game. Because he only spent 15+ shots to get 19.9 points in the third grade of the original space-time period, if you give him 23~25 shots, 30+ is not a dream. Besides, he has a natural desire to attack maniacs. In this way, the league may enter Kobe Bryant's scoring spree early. Calculated in this way, there are basically a few more scoring champions, and it is inevitable to get a burst of defense in the early years, and a little stronger, maybe because of the good record, mix with MVP. In that case, it must be a scene of Kobe and Iverson scoring for supremacy in the early stage, but Iverson is not an offensive and defensive one, and the overall ceiling is not as good as Kobe, so it is certain that he can't fight Kobe. After all, this Kobe Bryant has been training alone since his rookie season, and his growth rate is much faster than the original time and space.

In this way, Kobe Bryant has 3 fewer championships, and he should be able to win a few more scoring titles, a few more times, and if he is lucky, he will have one more MVP. The big honors in the back remain the same, 2 MVPs, 2 FMVPs, 5 or more scoring titles, plus more one set and one defense than now, and the total score reaches 4 points (if you start with a score, that's for sure). After retiring, you see if the historical status will be much higher. Many people say that O'Neal is Kobe's luck, in fact, this is Kobe's biggest misfortune, because O'Neal, his three championships are almost ignored, no matter what data he plays, in the face of the weak interior line in the East, it must be O'Neal who gets the FMVP. And he was also delayed in leveling and leading the team, and the honor was a little less, you said lucky? Where's the luck? Lucky is that you have 3 champions in front of you, and you will always be the second leader? Forever sarcastic is the second in the department?

If Kobe Bryant didn't have the honor of leading the team behind him, he would have a miserable historical status.

Therefore, the three championships are not necessarily a good thing for Kobe Bryant in the early stage.

Is it fortunate or sad that you can lose countless opportunities for personal honor and personal advancement after receiving the highest honors?

Besides, during that period of 7~8 years, it is impossible for the team not to be strengthened, in case it enters the realm of 07~10 years early, wouldn't it be possible to get the boss championship earlier?

So after going through so much, and winning 3 finals and 2 championships, do you doubt his ability to lead the team? Isn't that ridiculous? Just ask, it wasn't Kobe Bryant who led the team in those years, who led the team? Can you name someone else? Furthermore, the PER and S problem is a data model that the NBA has not officially recognized, and countless players and coaches don't care about it. You say Gasol's 2010 playoffs are higher than Kobe? Well, I'm afraid a lot of people don't know, Kobe. Bryant's three consecutive championships actually have a year of winning rate contribution value higher than O'Neal's, that is, when he won the second championship, can it be said that Kobe Bryant was stronger than O'Neal that year, and he was the boss of the team? And ah, Gasol has never surpassed Kobe in the playoffs in those three years, and he has been lower than Kobe every year. It's really stupid to just talk about a tie-break, because FMVP is a round of data, not a game.

In that case, Kobe's stats will not be worse than Gasol's.

In super hand-to-hand combat, again, scoring is the highest level of data, because basketball is a scoring game.

The average of 28.6 + 8 + 3.9 + 2.1 per game is not as good as 18.6 + 11.6 + 3.7 + 2.6, that is impossible.

As for Curry's year, although he didn't play well (compared to his regular season), I personally think he definitely deserves the honor of FMVP than Iguodala, which is a lot more "wronged" than Bird. But basketball is a competitive sport, if you take it, you take it, if you don't take it, if you don't take it, whether it's luck or injury, it's all part of the strength. Zhan Huang won 4 MVPs, do you say he doesn't deserve it? That's impossible!

Don't overly veto a historical-level supergiant, they can get to this point, which is unimaginable to mortals.

As for Kobe Bryant being ranked twelfth, then I want to say that CBS regained its historical position in 2017, and Kobe Bryant returned to tenth place, does this count? It's not like CBS in 2016 and the next year, right? CBS, ESPN, Sports Illustrated, FOX Sports, these are the four major sports media in the United States in 2016. And after Wei Shao proves the myth of the "Big O" average triple-double per game, the status of the "Big O" will only decline in the future, not rise, otherwise what do you want Wei Shao to do?

Kobe Bryant has been dragged a lot of impression points in the last 3 years, but as time passes, the evaluation will slowly become fair.

Kobe's experience has given Tang Qian a lot of inspiration, so he also needs a lot of time to practice and a lot of experience in leading the team. In the past, he focused on improving the defensive side, but now that the defense is almost capped, he will have to turn around and improve the offensive end next. Kobe Bryant doesn't need the ball, but he needs to shoot, which will definitely have a huge conflict with Tang Qian's offensive growth.

So like Kobe, he waited for 7~8 years before he started to lead the team independently, Tang Qian asked himself, he couldn't do it.

If it weren't for the "different space" helping him, he really didn't know what the future would be.

A person who doesn't think about himself at all and is dedicated to being Lei Feng, this kind of person is not nothing, but there are too few and too little, Tang Qian understands that he can't be so noble. But only one year, he can accept it, and this psychological equilibrium point is equivalent to being reached.

Kobe Bryant and him are a win-win.

As for Jordan Jr.? Tang Qian doesn't think that he and his future are at the same level.

It's not pride, it's just a fact.

At halftime, little Jordan was about to cry, and he couldn't help but wonder if he didn't train in the summer, just dreaming. Why? Because he was blown up in the first half of the rebound, how bad? Opponent 9, what about him? There are only 2 of them.

It's not as exaggerated as the ability card, but it also drives little Jordan crazy.

Is this still the rebounding game I've worked on all summer long? In front of him, just like a high school student? Ravaged? Hanged?

！ Are you kidding!!!

As soon as Tang came back in the second half, he found that little Jordan was actually ...... It's a blast!

I'll go, this guy really can't be underestimated!

But......

Do you think you can win me by popping seeds?

Tang Qian grinned and said, "I'm sorry, that's a dream."

He finally experienced what it was like to be Rodman, old. What do you care about the four centers, old. It doesn't matter what level of inside line you have, in short...... Rebounding is old. Son! It's that simple!

It's so rough!

DeAndrew. When Jordan was substituted, his eyes were straight, and he looked at No. 29 on the field, ashamed, annoyed and shocked.

I exploded myself, but I was still suppressed by my opponent? Is this still human? Did he also explode? Or entered "The.Zone"?

Tang Qian's physical strength crystal brick has been increased by half in the tower, and it is no problem to support 35 minutes in the regular season, and the playoffs are said otherwise. In this game, he got 11 points, 17 rebounds, 5 blocks and 3 assists, no way, it was too early into garbage time, and he was replaced early to rest. Only 31 minutes were played. What about Kobe? He also "broke his promise", scoring 38 points in 34 minutes, still 2 points and 40 points.

The Lakers outscored by 9 points, 100-91.

If it weren't for the fact that the bench was too weak and was caught up a lot in garbage time, at least a 15-point margin would have ended.

The local derby Lakers won and got off to a good start.

Charles. Barkley said after the game: "It's a black mamba-style scoring show, hopefully it's not an outburst."

An outbreak?

Hehe, I'm afraid that everyone can't help but be scared in the back.

Tang Qian looked at No. 24, and he also had a preliminary understanding of his defensive strength after coming out of the tower.

It's not that Jordan Jr. is too weak, it's that his defense is too strong.

And now, that's not the limit.

PS: I often hear people talk about the theory of wealth, but in fact, if you have really studied the data, you will know that there is no basis for it at all. It's nice that Los Angeles is the second largest city in the United States, but what about the number one Knicks? Shouldn't it be more appealing to players? In fact? Look at Chicago, the third largest city in the United States, if it weren't for a Jordan, what status would it have? What about all these years? How many stars are flocking to it? Houston is the fourth largest city, do they also have a big city bonus? Philadelphia is the fifth-largest city, does it have a big city bonus? What about the sixth-place Phoenix? What about San Antonio in seventh? What about Dallas in ninth?

After Kobe Bryant retired, everyone can see it, it stands to reason that Kobe is gone, and the big city bonus stars should gather to develop, or is that sentence, in fact? The so-called big city effect does not exist in the NBA at all. Unless you're in some really small city, it's pretty much the same, like Salt Lake City, Toronto, or Canada's largest city, how many people know? What is really compared in basketball is whether you can win the championship, whether you can make a lot of money, and how much exposure and development prospects you have in the future. For example, if the Warriors win several championships in the future, they will also become a mecca for players who want to win championships, and they have nothing to do with the city. Well, it's not too absolute, but it's certainly not as exaggerated as some people say. Because of what team a player goes to, the first choice is to make money, and the second is whether the team can meet their vision or not, which is extremely important for players who have already won the championship, and in the end, it is actually whether the city is good or not.

Another example, the Clippers are also in Los Angeles, and their new owner is super rich, more than the ten Bass families combined, is there no big city factor? You can say that it is a problem of team heritage, this is okay, but using the guise of a big city to deceive people, this can only mean that you have done too little data statistics and are not detailed enough.