The Lakers missed, the Spurs took the rebound, and then, they turned around and hit another one!

This...... You must know that the Spurs are now 4 people to protect defensive rebounds, and basically don't defend counterattacks, so their offense is basically destined to be a positional battle. And when the Lakers are all in a good position, isn't it strange that they still scored so easily?

In the next ball, Tang Qian's attack on the inside caused Duncan's defensive foul, but he missed 2 free throws, which was equivalent to wasting an offensive opportunity.

This is not the main thing, the main thing is that this time the attack, the San Antonio people hit again!!

What's the situation??? The Spurs only took 3 offensive rounds to trail the Lakers by just 1 point? What kind of offensive efficiency is that??? Are you kidding??? If you analyze it carefully, you will find that the Spurs have completely different routines in these three rounds. The first ball was Parker's breakthrough through Neser Ginobili's off-ball run Duncan low cover, the second ball was Duncan pulled to the high post to do the shaft, bounced off and projected a mid-range, and the third ball was a more classic Spurs tactical name called ".of. Bound", you can also call it the "BOB" tactic. The main thing is to make a wall in the high post, and then attack or pass the ball around the wall on the wings. Parker threw the ball.

This is actually a bit excessive, because the NBA will not play so many continuous tactical routines under normal circumstances, or that sentence, the implementation of tactics requires energy and concentration, a team's carrying capacity is limited, and it has been running tactics, even if it is Europe with tactical ball civilization, it will be completely exhausted. The Bulls used to have a guy called Doug. Collins' head coach is a crazy tactics fan, and according to Jordan's own recollection, there was something new for the Bulls players to learn almost every day. Don't think this is a good thing, Jordan himself once "complained" in his autobiography that the Bulls players were dragged down by a lot of tactics every time, and the last thing was that the execution declined and there were repeated mistakes. So this, in fact, is not a lie.

Too much tactical use, too much consumption of overall energy and concentration, people are not machines, the more complex the tactics, the more they must be used less in a game. "Good steel is used on the blade", this is a basic tactical operation method of modern NBA basketball.

So like the Spurs, three balls in a row are tactical balls, which is a bit abnormal.

There are basically no singles and simple shots, and I don't know what Popovich thinks.

Isn't he afraid that the Spurs will wear out tactical execution too quickly and end up with an energetic "collapse"?

With 38 seconds left in the second quarter, looking at the score again, the San Antonio Spurs had actually overtaken the score, not 1 point and 2 points. Tang Qian received the ball inside, and the strong attack caused a foul on Dio, making 1 of 2 free throws, and there were about 20 seconds left in the game.

The Spurs still didn't have any intention of playing fast, but slowly dribbled through the half, and then waited for people to stand up and start the half-court offense.

Celestial Empire Sports Station.

"It's best for the Lakers to defend this ball, otherwise it will be overtaken so much, and it will be psychologically difficult to accept." After Zhang Weiping finished speaking, the Spurs have begun to run the ball, that is, the zipper tactical system has begun, Ginobili mentioned the top arc with the help of the inside cover, this ball The Lakers did a good job of defense, and did not let the Spurs' No. 1 position, that is, Parker's bottom line, succeed, but this was not over, because the Spurs made a tactical deformation in an instant.

Ginobili directly began to break through at a 45-degree angle, although with the help of cover, the ball was squeezed by Kobe Bryant, breaking the Spurs' wall this time. Ginobili still didn't pass the ball, what was he waiting for? Waiting for Leonard to come over! When Leonard came over, it was a hand-to-hand pass!

"Look at him! What about defenders? Kobe yelled, but the Leonard defender didn't show up the first time. Young's defensive fundamentals were a bit watery, so he was shaken off by Leonard with a no-ball shake start. Although we are trying to catch up in the back, it is actually too late.

Kobe Bryant cursed, decisively gave up his defender, and then went to switch to Leonard. This ball was done in a timely manner, and even if it was Kobe Bryant a little later, it would be impossible to keep up. Leonard's defense has really evolved this season in the playoffs, and by the end of the game he has actually reached the level of DPOY next season. However, this is only defense, and Leonard's offensive end has not been developed much this season.

At present, at this level, he wants to hold the ball and play Kobe Bryant, who is at the peak of his all-round life, it is simply "tired".

But Leonard didn't stop, he was still breaking through with the ball.

Kobe Bryant sneered when he saw this, because he thought that the opponent's offense was completely impossible to break his defense.

This idea, there is nothing wrong with it, and there is no problem, Leonard in the 13-14 season, it would be strange if he could break this Kobe Bryant's defense. However, Leonard is also a star who is recognized as having a high ball quotient in the future, how stupid can he be? Of course not, because Kobe Bryant was forcibly pressed the "stop button" in the process of following the defense! Naturally, this could not have been stopped by the 24th itself, but was ......

Duncan, who ran over, died directly in place.

Duncan's offensive and defensive ability has declined, but the willingness and quality of blocking and dismantling are even better than before. Because he is now with the Spurs, the main focus is no longer on tackling the problem, making the team run more smoothly as a whole, which is another mode of his transformation as a core. Very successful, at least in the Spurs, he managed to go from an offensive sledgehammer to a lubricant, and this kind of transformation of the core model, the average star, in the average team, basically can't be achieved.

Tim. Duncan is a match made in heaven between the Spurs and Popovich, all three.

Except for the legendary Green Army, there may be no such close relationship again.

"Defend! Keep an eye on Leonard! Watch out! I'm blocked!! ”

Jordan. Hill's defensive awareness is so poor, mainly because his first idea, which is ingrained, is to "brush the data" rather than defend. It's a huge problem for his future, and there aren't many managers who really like that. Again, these things are for the "laymen" outside, and some really experienced head coaches don't care about these things at all, he thinks that if they can't do it, they can't do it.

It's more about experience and feeling.

It seems to be a "stream of impressions", but in fact, basketball is a highly competitive sport, and cold statistics can only be used as a reference rather than a factor that dominates the head coach's main coaching. Perhaps as a joke, you can also call them "insider impressions".

Relying on data to coach, none of them have really become famous coaches.

But the problem is that D'Antoni himself has no defensive adjustment ability, and the Lakers are not aiming for the NBA championship at the beginning of this season. Therefore, after signing a large number of temporary workers and mercenaries as a whole, D'Antoni was even more unable to perform. You have to know that if Nash hadn't forced a comeback in the second half of the season, D'Antoni's previous games would have been a near-out of control situation for the Lakers, and there would be no big problem with laissez-faire. The offensive system is not connected to the team, what defense do you want to talk about? D'Antoni really doesn't have the ability to do that.

Historically, there are few who can forcibly integrate this kind of lineup in one season.

Leonard takes advantage of Jordan. Hill's defense didn't get out in time, and he actually stepped back, exited the three-point line, and then shot out.

Brush~

The basketball hit the Lakers' basket safely.

There were only 1.9 seconds left until the end of the first half.

Don't underestimate Leonard's three-point shot, he is a player who has always had a strong three-point ability, not that he has the ability of Kobe Maddy to force a three-point shot, or he has a very accurate grasp of when to shoot a three-pointer. That's why his playoff three-point shooting percentage is frighteningly high.

That's almost 42% this season! No matter who you compare it to, it's an extremely good three-point shooting percentage! At least in the case of a large number of offensive and defensive transitions in the future, his ability to capture three-point opportunities like this is already enough.

A few years later, the league will be completely different, without so many strict defenses and high-intensity interference, Kobe Maddy's ability to separate people from three points can gradually become unimportant. Instead, it is to capture the opportunity between offense and defense to ensure the shooting rate and efficiency. Besides, I'm always talking about James, Paul, Durant, etc., who remembers, in fact, the Spurs' No. 2 is also an efficiency maniac, and he once played a super efficiency value of 31.5 in the future of the playoffs. So efficient basketball should be counted as one of them.

The Lakers didn't call a timeout either, and Bryant missed a three-pointer from a long half, and the game went into halftime.

At halftime, the Spurs have now scored 67 points, and 3 minutes is equivalent to 17 points at once, although it is not as exaggerated as the Warriors and Rockets who scored more than 20 points in 3 minutes, but it is not bad. After all, the Spurs are playing a position-based offense, and there is basically no offensive and defensive switching. So from that aspect, it's pretty scary. What about the Lakers? Instead, he only scored 5 points in the back. At 63-67, the Lakers returned to the locker room from four points behind.

Tang Qian suddenly understood the meaning of Duncan's previous words at this time.

What is called "no next time".

Because, if you really look at this game in detail, you will see that since Duncan said this, the Spurs have hardly scored with the same tactics. This also makes the Lakers an opponent. N.D！ This is also an exaggeration! There is no logic or trace to be found!

If it weren't for Tang Qian's hard defense, this score might have been even bigger.

It's just, how did the Spurs do all this???

That's too much of a load on the players, right?

Anyway, if you want the Lakers to do this, you will have to collapse first after a few balls.

At halftime, ESPN began to "taunt" the Lakers, this is the energy of history, and no one can break this "law". Because of the four sets in a row, the consumption of the team is too great, even the NBA team can't bear this continuous consumption. Jerry. Lucas also cited a recent Trail Blazers comeback failure in 2003, when the Trail Blazers led the Mavericks at the end of the third quarter. but collapsed without warning in the final quarter, and was slashed by the Dallas Mavericks by 36 points in one go! It was an era with a very slow number of rounds and a very slow pace, with 36 points in a single quarter! Or the G7 of the playoffs! It's a bit surreal no matter how you look at it! The Trail Blazers only scored 22 points in a single quarter! In fact, just looking at 22 points in a single quarter, the playoffs were not too few in that era, but you can't stand the opponent's 36 points in a single quarter!

Therefore, the collapse of the fourth quarter is a kind of inertia.

In the same way, the Nuggets in the 1994 playoffs also had a collapse momentum in the last game, and they couldn't save the decline by grabbing 53 rebounds in a single game! Defeated by the "Utah Twins" in one go!

So, Jerry. Lucas asserted that the Lakers' "decline" in the second half will be more and more obvious and more reflected.

Some Lakers fans listened to it, were not happy, and began to leave "disgusting" remarks on ESPN's side: What bullshit history! Then I also said that as long as the team participated in this kind of big turnaround, it has not won the NBA championship in history! Do you agree?

All of a sudden, this remark was bombarded by countless Spurs fans: . T go! That's your Lakers' territory! Also, don't make such disgusting statements!! We in San Antonio, but we have a tradition of winning championships in odd-numbered years!!

Hahahaha! Odd-numbered champions? Why didn't you get it last year? And big brother, I'm afraid you're going to be confused, this year is 2014, not a singular year! Hahahaha!!

Obviously, this Lakers fan's message was "besieged", but it did make a little sense.

Don't you like to talk about history? Isn't that too? Why, the good ones are acceptable, and the bad ones are not acceptable?

. T also made his own half-time analysis, Reggie. Miller believes that if the Lakers want to change the situation and suppress the offensive momentum of the Spurs, they must first pay attention to their blocking and pick-and-roll, especially the continuous blocking and pick-and-roll after passing, and must be defended, at least to give a certain amount of pressure. Secondly, the defense and rotation must keep up, like the three-point shot that was thrown by Leonard at the end, if the rotation keeps up, it is actually enough to create effective interference. Kenny. Smith's point of view is to pay attention to the tacit understanding and change of defense between the players, and let the No. 29 out, he is the person who should stay in the Lakers' basket the most. Also pay attention to the Spurs' baseline cut, which has already scored a lot of goals tonight. Charles. Barkley's opinion was a bit "weird", and he actually suggested that Lakers head coach Mike Barkley should be a bit "strange". D'Antoni tried to let go of Duncan or Dior's pick-and-roll pop-up projection, which could concentrate the defensive strength and not easily disarray the defensive formation. It sounds a bit interesting, but in fact, the operability is not so high, because whether it is Duncan or Dior, they all have the strength of empty long-range shots, so it is tantamount to gambling, in case of failure, there is no chance to turn the tables. So even if you really want to do that, it's not now.

O'Neal's side was even more interesting, he just commented casually, and then actually "wrote a big book", talking about how he used to hold it, how he dealt with the Spurs, what would happen if he was on this Lakers team, and so on.

Barkley, who was next to him, was a little impatient, and he said something to help O'Neal cool down: "Don't forget, when you play the Spurs in the playoffs, the statistics have never been very good, especially on the offensive end." And your defensive positive performance and hot ratio? If you were replaced, the Lakers' defense would only be more vulnerable and easy to break. ”

O'Neill was a little annoyed when he heard this, and said, "You mean I'm not as good as him? Charles? Not as good as this blue-collar rookie? ”

Barkley really nodded and replied: "In terms of defense and rebounding, you are indeed inferior to him, which is still good, in other words, it is...... There is no need to compare. You are not on the same level on this side. ”

As soon as these words came out, O'Neill's face turned dark.

Without it, it's infuriating.

PS: One more chapter! Keep writing! I won't break my promise!!! Please cheer for Xiaozi!!!!!!!!!