Volume 5 ended sooner than expected.

Originally, I wanted to write a little more cyberpunk plot, but now the policy does not allow it, because the nature of the cyberpunk world is clear to you, and the huge gap between rich and poor can easily be understood as ezy, which further triggers the potential risk of censorship.

So let's try not to cause trouble to the platform.

————————

As for the description of the gap between the rich and the poor in Solomon, the original outline was to write about the three poor and the rich.

The three povertys refer to "gang rampant", "drug abuse" and "human experimentation", which is a portrayal of the life of the poor at the bottom of the city.

The "drug abuse" part is not written because of the sensitive policy, but it is just a little bit with the help of Eleanor's sister's narrative, and let everyone know that there is indeed drug abuse in Solomon's City.

In fact, most of the poor people in the out-Solomon suburbs are often struggling to make ends meet in difficult living conditions, relying on alcohol and drugs to numb themselves.

Some of them, unwilling to accept the status quo, joined illegal gangs in an attempt to steal wealth from the rich inner city, which caused the city of Solomon to be unstable.

Others are willing to sacrifice themselves as "paid volunteers" for the Holy See experiment, so that they can get the first wealth that can be invested in the future, hoping that the next generation will be able to achieve a class jump.

After taking stock of the whole volume, at least "Gang Rampant" and "Human Experiments" were written corresponding plots. Directly witnessing these phenomena caused the three views of Nora and Mi'er to be violently impacted. However, under the guidance of different currents of thought, the two of them gradually embarked on different paths.

Nola's line of the Holy See is to carry out gentle reforms from top to bottom, ensure that social contradictions are alleviated, and strive to develop production capacity and scientific and technological level, so as to ensure that the Holy See can survive the next demon tide - after all, they are facing the dual threat of foreign supernatural forces and the suppression of containment.

Mill's revolutionary line was to carry out drastic change from the bottom up, to intervene and destroy the papal and trusting enterprises, and to oppress and exploit the citizens of Solomon City and the people of the world.

This involves a classic proposition: the contradiction between labor and capital.

Numerous economists in the country are advocating for a reduction in labor protections in order to "increase the vitality and profitability of enterprises." Of course, leaving aside the theism that "the management is a vulnerable group" put forward by some professors, if we do not take any protection of labor at all, it is probably a good thing for the enterprise organization, but it is an outright bad thing for the workers.

But what about humanity as a whole? I can't tell.

In some harsh situations, such as the scene depicted in the Poles' "Frostpunk Age", the survival of humanity itself is seriously threatened in the freezing and freezing environment. At this time, don't talk about 996, 687 (6 a.m. - 8 p.m., 14 hours a day) we can do it without psychological pressure - everyone will say that the sacrifice is all worth it.

What if it's not a bad situation? As the living conditions improve, more and more people will oppose the "exploitation of laborers". If one day you climb to the position of the first superpower, and there is no one in the world who can fight, and the productivity and materials are extremely abundant, and you still have 996 overtime? Are you kidding! Didn't we say we were going to do those four words?

Then let's go back to the world of the book.

May I ask: Has the scientific and technological civilization represented by the Holy See reached a critical point of survival? So much so that the exploitation of the people of Solomon City and indeed the entire Christian world was necessary and worthwhile?

Nora saw the danger of underground containment and the dangers of transcendent mutations, so she thought the situation was critical, and she could only accept the status quo by default and make gentle improvements;

Mi'er saw the human experiments of the Holy See and saw the suffering of the people at the bottom, so she felt that "your Holy See is a spicy chicken", "all have to die, all have to die".

Obviously, because of their different class origins and the deliberate guidance they received (both the Holy See and the Antichrist showed only one part of the truth and concealed the other), they formed different political opinions.

Similarly, I believe that the readers of this book also have different views, different political opinions, and even different sexual fetishes, so their views and choices are also different. Some support copper smelting, and some support rich women, these are normal and expected.

————————

After talking about the three poor, then the three rich.

The three riches refer to the advanced science and technology, the drunken life and the trust controlling everything, which is a portrayal of the life of the wealthy in the upper class of the city.

The intention of writing this is much simpler, which is to tell everyone that Nola's family is super rich.

In fact, the mere word "money" can no longer be used to describe the wealth of the Licinius family. Liquidity is only a small head, and the big part lies in the control of the most sophisticated industrial means of production in the whole world, and the value of this part of the asset is almost immeasurable.

As for whether the Holy See's human experiments are an abuse of science and technology, and whether the society in which trusts control everything is too cruel, this is a matter of opinion.

————————

Based on the above description, the "split" and "palace fight" are triggered.

The word Gong Dou is not accurate, because these girls are not Asker's property, so they are not Gong Dou.

If you say "Shura Field" may be more appropriate.,But this Shura field seems to be a little bigger.,It's not like what you see in the Japanese light.,The male and female A went on a date.,And then the female B came out and beat the male owner...... This kind of play is like a child playing at home.

Rather, it is a highly complex antagonistic situation mixed with political differences, class struggle, and other factors.

Of course, I must admit here that the main contradiction between them, whether it is political differences or class struggle, is the struggle for Asker's "belonging".

Perhaps this is just the right fit for the differences between men and women. It's like that many men like to let the single dog male protagonist fight the heavens and the earth, and in the end, the world is invincible before it is complete; And the female-oriented ending is often the positive result of love.

For the girls of the Green Sword, the success of their love is much more important than the realization of any political proposition.

Keeping this sentence in mind, those who are more worried that Gong Dou will trigger a "dead girl" do not need to worry that Asker will one day be unable to control the scene, causing the girls to kill each other.

As long as he's here, this one can be calmed.

Even if he is gone and causes chaos in the world, as long as he returns, all the secondary contradictions will disappear - "getting the regiment leader" will become the main contradiction, and this contradiction cannot be solved by fighting and killing.

Because Asker didn't want that to happen, and the girls had to respect him.

How else is it a male protagonist (laughs)