If such a syringe attack with half the number of needles is at a distance of about 100 or even 50 steps, it is really unlikely to threaten these two inner door masters, even if they can make one or two flying needles hit the opponent, I am afraid that because their temporary weapons are too limited, it is impossible to make the opponent's combat power at least significantly reduced to a distance that they can easily deal with. But at a distance of only about ten zhang, it seems to be completely different.

Although the reactions of these two inner door masters were quite agile, they made their respective outward dodge movements almost at the same time as they shot, and with the help of the reaction force of terrain features, the speed of maneuvering was obviously beyond the ordinary ground footwork, but in only seven or eight seconds, the two who launched a lateral dodge with three times the acceleration of gravity were only just dodging less than half of their bodies.

From the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom to the Khmer Rouge, and even many countries under the influence of the Soviet Union and its influence, they have taken detours in terms of equality between men and women, rejection of families, etc.

There are very few people who are inferior in love and have universal collectivist feelings. The reason is also very simple: a person's time and energy are limited, so why should I defend the interests of people I don't know and don't know? Any idea of turning the majority of the people into universal saints is unrealistic. It is not that you ostracize and disintegrate the family that the people will become a whole class and society as a collective, "everyone is like a brother", or they will be more inclined to revolution. It is quite possible to become more negative, selfish, and ask for less.

Blood inheritance and genetic perpetuation are social beliefs that most laypeople can truly identify with more than communism or other political beliefs themselves. If you don't agree with this belief, then it is more likely that the belief is "live in the world, live in time" and "live well", anyway, it cannot be "no self-interest and only benefit others"

The family should not be born of affection and freedom per se, its greatest role is to assume the function of reproduction and education, and the so-called "freedom to marry" should be compromised to a certain extent if it violates this fundamental function.

Under the existing and even predictable future conditions, public education units cannot replace the unique spiritual belonging and educational functions of the family. Since people love and have differences, you can't expect to be a teacher group, and after the group of teachers is expanded, it is no longer possible for excellent people to be in charge, and those popular teachers will treat students as their own children. Even in a socialist society, it is more likely to be a cash cow or a target for gassing. As a result of the expansion of social upbringing, children who grow up in public institutions are more likely to encounter various dangers and problems in their personalities.

Not to mention the financial cost of public education as a substitute for family education.

The moral crisis and low fertility rate of the post-industrial era in Soviet and Eastern European society were the result of the lack of a conservative order.

As for talking about primitive societies? In primitive societies, people used to have incest between mothers and sons, and now, in many countries, including Japan, there are still primitive remnants of the taboo that allows cousin marriages and does not care about the sexual taboo between father and daughter. But this is not a symbol of progress, but a symbol of backwardness. If it is said that the extended family or clan is already outdated in accordance with the times and the polygamous system is already outdated in line with the feudal relations of production, then the existing family system is far from being withdrawn from the stage of history.

Regarding family relationships, let's take an analogy:

It is impossible to establish a strong alliance between two countries of equal or inferior power. For example, the relationship between the Soviet Union and Germany before World War II could not have strengthened the alliance. Even the United States, Britain, China and the Soviet Union, which share the same ideology, will not consolidate relations when one side does not have the means to control the economy of the other. The U.S. and Japan, and between the U.S. and NATO allies, have been consolidated because of their apparent strength and weakness and more appropriate economic means.

China and Russia may be a special case in the face of a common threat. However, in most cases, there is no so-called "common adversary" between husband and wife, as is the case between China and Russia. Without a clear economic dominance, the family is always at risk of disintegration. The excessive feudal hierarchy and even the inequality of all people, as implemented in the legal relations in ancient China, are outdated, and the proposition of "equality between men and women" that can be divorced from actual conditions is still a kind of presumptuous idealism.

Replacing part of the social security function with the family security function is also one of the important means to bypass the bureaucracy and the tax contractor and save the waste of welfare.

The United States, Russia, other countries in the Asia-Pacific region, and even Japan have the ability to threaten China without restraint, and Gengzi is second in the late Qing Dynasty and so on. So which one is the right one?

In fact, there is no need for too detailed arguments, just a glimpse or two from some simple and verifiable clues.

For strategic or geographical reasons, the weight of the status of the navy is not the same in all countries of the world, but the weight of the status of the air force is mostly not far behind. Even some small countries in Southeast Asia or Africa attach importance to the role of air power. The reason is that for many civilized and backward countries, the army is unreliable and inefficient, but it is not difficult to select a small number of elite and reliable personnel. This is why there was a huge disparity in air and ground performance in the Indo-Pakistani War and the Anglo-Argentine War. Although the performance of the Beiyang Naval Division in the late Qing Dynasty was problematic, it was also stronger than the army, and the same is true: for a late feudal dynasty, it is always not difficult to train thousands of reliable forces, while hundreds of thousands of reliable troops are very challenging to the civilization system.

And among the equipment that countries attach equal importance to, the most valuable equipment is no longer tanks, but helicopters (the equipment that best represents the level of the army is self-propelled artillery)

Regardless of inventory or reserves, the total number of third- or fourth-generation aircraft in various countries is about 8,000 to 9,000, with Chinese mainland accounting for more than 10 percent; however, the number of second-generation aircraft and improved second-generation aircraft is relatively small; and there are obvious problems in the proportion and quality of various transport aircraft, tankers, early warning aircraft, and bombers.

The lowest number of active military helicopters in the world is about 18,000, and about 1,000 to 1,100 in Chinese mainland;

Artillery belongs to equipment that is not easy to eliminate, the proportion of tanks and armored vehicles produced since the Cold War is not large, the production of various self-propelled guns of the M109 series is as much as about 9,000, and there are many M110, etc.; plus various self-propelled guns produced in the Soviet Union and other countries; the scale should be about 20,000; and 122 of the two or three thousand self-propelled guns in Chinese mainland still accounts for a significant majority. Most of the spare equipment is backward;

More than 80,000 M113 series armored vehicles have been produced, and most of them have not been eliminated, and China's infantry fighting vehicles and armored vehicles should account for less than 10% of the world's military strength.