is different from the performance of most modern martial arts-related films and television in Zhang Fan's impression, in the real master facing many small soldiers-level "low-handed" armed confrontations, there will be no need to spend one or two moves or even a few moves to deal with a small soldier, but many small soldiers are beating gongs on the side and waiting to be killed one by one.

The pace of the battles is noticeably faster than the battles described in many fantasy novels. If none of the enemy soldiers on the street were to disperse, they would be swept down by a dozen or more masters in an instant, ranging from one second to a few seconds. In the blink of an eye, there may be hundreds to hundreds of corpses all over the field, and the master will not have any physical exertion at all, just like an ordinary person is already very tired to do a dozen pull-ups, and ten may not be able to do it at all, but the strength ratio is doubled, it will be hundreds of pull-ups will also feel very relaxed, the same output, physical exertion is fundamentally different.

On the other hand, if many small soldiers react and carry out a collective counterattack, it will also put the master in danger in an instant, and they must kill the opponent in the shortest possible time and destroy the opponent's reaction speed and even morale, in order to safely obtain the maximum results. The complex alleyways maximize manoeuvre space, making the fight clearly in favor of the master.

There are not many military wars in this world, so they began to quickly and gradually assemble each other to cooperate with each other in guerrilla squads to fight more and more enemy soldiers on the streets.

There are many topics on the side of the Anti-Japanese War, and there are all those who aid the country and the country. There are many people who help the country, whether it is a peach guest or a Guderian bar. Therefore, as a novel forum, on the eve of the 70th anniversary of the Songhu Anti-Japanese War, we will seriously talk about the approximate possibility of leading the Anti-Japanese War.

1: I think the possibility of establishing a new China in advance before the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression is not without opportunities. The expansion of the rapid rebellion in various localities and the various policy lines of the Shanghai Central Committee after coming to the Soviet area have brought great problems to the revolution in the Soviet area. Leaving aside the room for improvement in this regard, the issue of Zhang Xueliang's choice of position in the Central Plains War alone will have a decisive impact on the revolutionary situation; therefore, I believe that it is feasible to establish a new China that will lead the unification of most of the passes before the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression. Some people say: The fifth anti-encirclement campaign was unsuccessful and there is still a sixth time. However, I believe that the Kuomintang and warlords before the War of Resistance did not have the human resources accumulated by Whampoa's long-term military education during the Liberation War and the reserves and family resources that were as many as the daily US aid materials, and they could not withstand a major strategic failure (from 1928 to the spring of 1937 alone, the national army and the warlords' field troops were reduced from 2.2 million to 1.7 million under the civil war)

2: The attitude of the Soviet Union: Some people say that ** will arouse the vigilance of the Soviet Union, and the Soviet Union may not be very enthusiastic about a unified red China. This misunderstood the state orientation of the USSR and the basic needs of the Far East. As a superpower, it needs to suppress other powers, and as a challenger to the system, the rise of new powers is a burden sharer, not necessarily a disadvantage. The Nationalist Government, which had an armed force of 5 million, was considered by Stalin to be the balancer of Japan at that time, but in practice, if it proved that the Nationalist Government, which had been overthrown internally, could not afford this task, it would be a matter of course to support the Nationalist Government to counter Japan and even increase its diplomatic bargaining chips against the United States and Britain.

3: Before the First Five-Year Plan and the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, it was impossible to give up the skin of the new democracy in order to gain the support of the Soviet Union, so the ultra-left risks such as the Great Mooncourt that some people imagined did not exist at least not long after the seizure of power and in the presence of serious external pressure.

Like those people in the late 80s, the way of thinking that the contemporary ruling class wants to completely sideline and only be the protagonist is divorced from the reality and reality of contemporary China. Socialism dominated by the ruling class and with the participation of the working people is the upper limit of the late 21st century. Therefore, the rejection of "bureaucrats or something else that is detached from production" is a utopian road that does not work at all.

Successful modern civilization does not rely only on "struggle", but also on compromise, benefit-sharing, and the united front are also the most important means. If you only think about self-supremacy, the Maoists come first, and you fantasize that the public are politicians and people with great self-discipline, then the result is only haste and not achievement. The 21st-century Chinese ruling class's "pseudo-universal suffrage" + North Korea-style economic mechanism to achieve the future level of Hong Kong in order to compete for global hegemony and legitimacy is a major victory for the people.

Keywords: Refute the "comparison of the achievements of the Kuomintang and the Communist Party in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression", and explain the problem more clearly and immediately.

In fact, to put it simply: hypothetical, I mean hypothetical: the Japanese army in Beijing and Tianjin suddenly increased by 100,000 troops, and these huge garrisons in the city were one day encountered several underground parties throwing a dozen grenades, and one of the Japanese soldiers was wounded, but none of them died.

In Huguang, a battle between 50,000 Japanese troops and 200,000 Nationalist troops took place, and the Japanese army consumed tens of thousands of artillery shells and millions of rounds of ammunition, and suffered thousands of casualties.

Is it possible to argue that the underground party in those towns and cities only fired a few shots and threw a few grenades, and the effect was compared with a fierce battle of the Japanese army of the same scale in the city? Can it be said that a few dozen members of the underground party resisted 100,000 Japanese troops, while the hundreds of thousands of troops of the national army only "resisted" 50,000 Japanese troops?

There are a few other fundamental historical mistakes, to name a few.

As for what TG wiped out 520,000 Japanese troops, and compared them with the Japanese army with one death and wounded? I don't think anyone who has the slightest attitude toward the history of the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression will have this kind of understanding. You can compare the Japanese army to one by one. Loess Ridge, Guan Jiayuan will not be in that situation. It will not annihilate hundreds of thousands of Japanese troops, a brigade-level annihilation war recognized by the other side, or even a self-admitted wing-level annihilation war.

If the TG was able to achieve a casualty ratio with the Japanese army during the War of Resistance Against Japan, which was several times stronger than the Nationalist army's war against Japan, then how could the Liberation War only exclude prisoners and only compare the casualties with the Nationalist army by 1:1 under the capture of the Soviet aid and transport brigade commander? (The TG of the Liberation War claimed that 1.71 million Nationalist troops were killed or wounded, 280,000 were killed in battle, 170,000 were missing, and 1.04 million were wounded, totaling 1.51 million)

It is a fact that in the war of liberation, the source of industrial munitions was insufficient, especially since the Japanese were not Kuomintang, and often resisted until they had very little ammunition left, and most of them died in battle. Fighting against Japan often outweighs the losses, and the ammunition of the puppet army is controlled by the Japanese; it is still possible to make a lot of money by fighting the recalcitrant army, and in addition, it can buy and collect a lot of money from the local armed forces.

However, it is not an objective attitude to rely on the Spring and Autumn period penmanship to tout the Chinese workers as the "leader" who has achieved a record comparable to the Kuomintang against Japan with only a few tenths of the arms and materials of the Nationalist army, or to do this when the ranks are greatly expanded and the army is greatly exchanged