With such a military situation alone, it is definitely impossible to judge whether this is from AI or human hands. Pen × fun × Pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 ｉｎｆｏ

The word "slightly better" is indeed a subjective word, but the answers on both sides are the same, and there is no difference.

The characteristic of AI is that it is rigid and only knows how to judge the situation according to the rules set by the programmer, without the slightest autonomy.

If you want to completely determine whether it is AI or human, the best way is to throw out quite a lot of small questions that are quite cumbersome, if it is a person, no matter who is facing a large number of trivial things, it will slowly start to get irritable, and there are some highly subjective and practical questions with the same meaning - of course, you have to change the way of asking - if there is an inconsistency, then you can conclude that it is a person, if the answer to a question is exactly the same from beginning to end, then the possibility of this is AI is relatively high.

For example, "What do you think of the overall performance of the national football team in this game?" After asking this, I asked the players, then the coach, and asked a lot of twenty or thirty other irrelevant things, and then asked, "Do you think the national football team has fully exerted its strength in this game?" Then he went on to ask fans, lights, venues, turf and whatever, and then asked these small questions, and then said "Do you think the national football team's performance in this game can satisfy you?" ”

Anyway, the question is to change it slightly, but don't change the options, if it's AI, it's definitely "I'm not rare to say it's rotten" from beginning to end, but if it's a human, you'll be directed to different answers after dozens of other questions.,

For example, in the questionnaire, tell everyone that the turf of this game is not suitable for the style of our country, and the referee is black...... Eh, the option that said "quite dissatisfied" at the beginning may later become "unsatisfactory".

If there is some background thrown out in the following question stems, such as "the Chinese team suffered a 0-4 defeat at home when facing this opponent on a certain day, a certain year, a certain month, or something", then some people's answers will become "relatively satisfied".

When doing this kind of investigation, there is actually a lot in common with the news media, that is......

The minds of the masses can be manipulated, especially in the case of information troops, which is very easy.

Because of this, many people say that journalists are not virtuous.

Lu Ming is now adopting this line of thinking, and after the herald returned, he immediately sent people out to ask whether there were any loopholes in the distribution of the enemy's troops, whether the composition of the troops was unscientific, whether the terrain was complicated, which line it was better to attack from, whether it was necessary to increase the number of troops, and whether it was possible to increase the number of troops......

Anyway, none of them can quantify a standard answer.

And many questions even Lu Ming himself felt inexplicable, such as a "general thinks that such a weapon is good to attack the mountain".

Of course, Lu Ming didn't really want to ask the answer, but to see if the answers on both sides were the same.

When I ask, I ask every 20 seconds or so, and when I come back......

Around the time of the seventh or eighth question, the two sides began to diverge.

Liu Boyong's side is "it is difficult to use cavalry here", and Huang Yidao's side is "only the head of the big man and the horse are looking forward." ”

Huang Yidao's answer, Lu Ming has seen it I don't know how many times, and he would have used other sentences at the beginning, such as "let the adults send you", "the last general will not dare to follow", and when there is a lot of military intelligence in the back, there are more and more sentences about the horse's head is looking at it.

But even if it is like this, both sides have said it at the same time before, but this is the first time that the two sides have given different answers.

In fact, when the words just reported were almost monopolized by this sentence, Lu Ming could basically conclude that this was indeed someone playing the NPC.

The system should directly add different words to different military situations.,NPCs just choose the answer directly.,At the beginning, both sides will look for it.,There are more and more boring questions in the back.,Just don't bother to find it.。

It seems that this sentence "the horse's head is looking ahead" may be the first sentence in the system alternative library.

Before, it was "basic", but now that there is a disagreement, this prefix is no longer needed - it is absolutely impossible for an AI that uses the same algorithm in the same game to have different answers to the same problems.

After saying that he was not convinced, he also thought so, but also said, "Don't stop asking questions first, then send them over, and then come to a few simple tasks by the way, don't let them doubt it." ”

Lu Ming is complaining, these questions are purely for entertainment, the people who answer them are hard, and the people who actually think about them are just as uneasy.

Bite the bullet and then ask about the weather and astrological signs--Lu Ming himself felt nervous--and then sent a few small instructions, pulling some NPCs near two or three plank roads in key places to the same road to attack.

When this order came out, the casualty ratio -- went up even faster......

Lu Ming really doesn't understand, concentrating superior forces to fight, there is no reason to fight badly against the soldiers; Doesn't that mean that five flimpy fingers can burst a tightly clenched fist?

……

Don't say it, it's true, cloth eats stones......

Lu Ming couldn't understand, and said unconvinced, "Maybe it's because the terrain of this map is connected to the front and back, you concentrate your firepower on one road and withdraw the others, and the opposite side will rush down along the other empty roads and go around the rear to attack, or the flank attack is still secondary, the main reason is that the side can't prevent the stray arrows on the opposite side." ”

His tone was the same as speculation, which made Lu Guo sigh for a while, and he was not convinced, but he had to say generously, "Command is originally about experience and reaction, and it has always been based on the first wave of hedging to decide which routine to use, and if it doesn't work, change it again until it can produce results, and it is impossible to say that one trick is really eaten all over the world." ”

There is no way, Lu Ming's side can only cancel the previous order, and still spread out the stalls as at the beginning, forcibly divide the troops and fight the bulldozer sweeping tactics.

Not to mention, the casualty rate is indeed slower, and then there is an order to let the troops who rush forward stop for a while and wait for the friendly troops around them, and the casualty rate has slowed down a bit, of course, the speed of advancement has also slowed down, but compared to the casualty side, the change is more obvious, and it is still a little useful.

Once the first step is determined, the next step is to really lie about the military situation.

Of course, this step was still slightly delayed, because it was very close to the resurrection point on the mountainside, and that place had a wide field of vision, and any tactics were blind.

When the whole army broke through the resurrection point on the mountainside, the two generals were so far away that they fought separately for more than ten years

A few minutes later, Lu Ming finally gave the order for the two of them to attack two - a winding plank road nearly 100 meters long.

What Lu Ming didn't expect was that the two of them had to "advise" Lu Ming together.