Number 5: "Please hand me the knife." Pen? Interesting? Pavilion wWw. ｂiquge。 infoOh my God, I hate these things. Have you ever seen someone fight with a short sword? No? No? None of them? Well, I've seen it. I was bent and they were fighting in the courtyard across the street. It's not uncommon to have a dagger in a place where I live. I tried not to think about it, and I tried to forget it. ”

He Xi: "Can you demonstrate the correct use of this short sword?" ”

Number 5 picked up the dagger and did a series of simulated moves.

Number 5: "See?" No one will hold the short sword high with both hands, so the flaw left is too big, and the short sword is used with one hand, and the frequent change of hands can also give you more opportunities to kill, if it is a two-person fight with a huge height difference, you will definitely find a way to take advantage of the low body to attack in the lower body area of the opponent, and the wound will inevitably be horizontally cut or obliquely upward, so that it is more convenient to make force. ”

He Xi: "Do you think Sherlock can kill Antonio by raising his hands above his head and stabbing Antonio in the chest with a short sword?" ”

Number 5: "No, I don't think it's almost unlikely. Unless Sherlock is Antonio sneaking up, or Antonio lying or crouching, that contradicts the lady's testimony. ”

Number 4: "Interesting reasoning, but unfortunately, I'm still not convinced." Madame's testimony is conclusive, you only proved that the murder position is more difficult, but you have no way to prove that it is absolutely impossible. Your starting point is hypothetical, and the starting point of Madame's testimony is objective facts. ”

Number 3: "That's right! That lady could not have been mistaken! ”

He Xi: "Dissent! ”

Number 3: "What?" ”

He Xi: "It's impossible to be wrong, right?" Look, this is a court photo of a lady in court, and she has two deep indentations on both sides of the bridge of her nose, and I'm right. The lady was about forty years old, but she worked hard to make herself look like she was only in her thirties. She wore heavy makeup, dyed her hair, and wore new clothes that only young girls would wear. She was hiding one thing, one very important thing. ”

Number 2: "I don't quite understand, what is she hiding?" ”

He Xi: "She concealed that she had a vision problem, and she usually needed to wear glasses!" Only people who wear glasses for a long time will have such deep marks on both sides of the bridge of the nose! ”

Number 1: "Hey, listen, Number 8 is right, I saw it too, I was the closest person to her, she did have those marks on her nose, and she had been massaging her nose in court!" ”

Number 4: "It's strange that I didn't think of this before. That's right, she really should be wearing glasses. ”

Number 3: "So what! Ha? Well, she has a mark on her nose, I admit it, that's caused by the glasses, right? She didn't want to wear glasses when she appeared in court, so everyone would think she was beautiful. But when she saw Sherlock kill Antonio, she was alone in the room! She saw it clearly! ”

He Xi: "The lady's testimony shows that she went to bed at about eleven o'clock, and at about twelve o'clock, because of the whistle of the cargo ship entering the port late at night, she turned to the window and happened to see the killing. So, when she saw the killing, she was still in bed. I have a trivial question, will anyone sleep with glasses on? ”

Number 4: "No, I won't. No one goes to sleep with glasses on. ”

He Xi: "Therefore, I think I have reason to make a reasonable assumption that the lady was lying in bed without glasses. ”

No. 3: "Gan! How do you know? ”

He Xi: "I don't know, I'm just speculating." I also speculate that she didn't have glasses when she looked out the window. She testified that she had just looked out the window at the time of the crime, the whistle sounded for a maximum of ten seconds, and that she had witnessed the entire murder and that she had no time to put her glasses on. She thinks the killer she saw was none other than Sherlock. I think she just saw a blur of shadows. ”

Number 3: "How do you know what she saw?" Ha? How do you know so many things? How do you know what kind of glasses she is wearing? Maybe she's farsighted? How do you know? ”

He Xi: "I just want to express that the lady's vision problem is suspicious, and her testimony is not absolutely convincing. ”

Number 11: "Number 8 is right, without glasses, she has to clearly identify people on the street in the dark of midnight, which a person with vision problems simply can't do. ”

No. 5: "We can't condemn a person to death on the basis of such vague evidence alone!" ”

Bite! System Prompt: The mission "Reverse Jurors" is currently 99% complete (updated in time).

Well? Why hasn't it been done yet? Actually 1% worse?

Number 3: "Humph! Even if you all think Sherlock is innocent, so what? Ha? I think he's guilty, that's guilty, I don't care if I'm alone, it's my right! ”

Number 3 walked straight to the corner of the room, turned his back to the crowd, and curled up there, silent.

It turns out that there is one more NPC that has not been reversed. He Xi scratched his head, the entire lounge was the most stubborn on the 3rd, fighting against He Xi from beginning to end, fighting in the ring, and finally leaving him to resist stubbornly, He Xi was not surprised. But how can we get him to change his attitude completely?

Unlike other opposition characters, No. 4 is a rational insistence on guilt, but after He Xi refutes him, he immediately supports a more rational innocence; No. 7 is a wall-to-wall grass, and when the general situation is innocent, he defects faster than anyone else; No. 10 is a regional black + racist, even No. 3 sneered at him, and he finally followed the crowd in a gray way, with no more right to speak; Only number 3 has only one point of view from beginning to end: Sherlock is guilty. He would not change his attitude because of any change in circumstances, and he seemed to oppose for the sake of opposition, only to send Sherlock to the execution bench.

There are generally two reasons why people like this choose to do this.

He Xi: "No. 3, have you ever had a grudge with Sherlock, or Antonio, or even Baucia?" ”

Number 3: "What?" Of course not, Sherlock I've heard the name, the other two have never heard of before! ”

Well, then one of them is excluded, and only ...

He Xi: "No. 3, did you ever have a close friend who was murdered, and the murderer betrayed and escaped without guilt?" Or have you ever had a close friend convicted of murder and sentenced to death even though he was innocent? ”

No. 3 raised his head and looked at He Xi, he opened his mouth, but he didn't make a sound. After a long time, he took out a photo and gently rubbed the corner, tears in his eyes.

In the photo, there are two figures, one of which is the older one is No. 3, the younger one, who looks like his child.