The 2-3-5 layout puts pressure on the opposition as these five strikers can roam back and forth in the opponent's penalty area, greatly disrupting the opponent's deployment. Pen @ fun @ pavilion wWw. ｂｉｑUｇE。 info The teams that are not good at this style of play have expressed headaches and annoyance.

At first, the strikers were unaware of the problem, but as the formation intensified, the five strikers in the 2-3-5 formation became more and more passive, blindly waiting in the opposition penalty area to catch the opportunity to score, and some of the strikers even stood with the opposing goalkeeper and waited for the right moment to score when the goalkeeper came to save the ball.

This style of play showed a big loophole in the football game, and as a result, the "offside" appeared after 1920.

The advent of offside brought new problems to the 2-3-5 style of play, and it wasn't long before the five strikers learned to move smartly to play against offside and developed new characteristics.

That is, when the opponent thinks that he can be offside and boldly move forward, the five strikers will follow the opponent's back line at a certain distance, and once it is time to counterattack, the five strikers will suddenly rush towards the opponent's door like mercury, so 2-3-5 is still flawless.

In 1934, the Italian national team used this style of play to win the World Cup, and coach Vittorio Pozzo summed up the tactics of the British, and after the 2-3-5 was implemented at home, fans regarded it as a "textbook" without loopholes.

This is the history of the two-back formation at the beginning of the last century, when there were no full-backs, no wing-backs and no wing-backs, and the focus was on the middle.

Since then, apart from the three-back tactic with one more defender, there has never been such an ancient formation as a double back.

Some people say that 2-5-3 (whether it is 2-3-2-2-1 or 2-4-1-2-1, there are too many numbers, the author doesn't want to keep pressing a number and then pressing a short horizontal line every time he types, it's too troublesome, so it will be simplified to 2-5-3, of course, when it comes to the game, it is still necessary to specifically play 2-3-2-2-1 or 2-4-1-2-1, because of the difference in the number of positions, the tactical play will be different, After all, tactical details are a matter of success or failure) is actually 4-5-1, because the wing-back position is not parallel to the two midfielders, so it is actually a back four.

Moreover, in tactical theory, only the three-back formation has the setting and name of wing-back, and the two wing-back positions of the back four are usually called full-backs.

Do you think what he said is true?

First of all, we need to figure out the difference between a full-back and a wing-back.

Full-backs are more responsible for stretching the width of the attack and defense on the wing and supporting the advancement of the ball in modern football, as an auxiliary and participant in the attack, the full-back needs to find a balance between attack and defense, and the defensive ability of an excellent full-back is still the core of the examination.

The wing-back is more like a midfielder, but the wing-back is different from the traditional wing-back in that the former is positioned further back than the latter, theoretically almost parallel to the midfield, but more flexible, with more emphasis on vertical running support and lateral support for sweeping from the back.

Wingbacks are generally combined with three central defenders, with wingbacks needing to use their speed to assist the midfielders to form interceptions when defending in the high post, and returning to the full-back position to mark the opponent's wide attacking players when defending back. When attacking, it is necessary to provide support for the width of the attack for the wingers on the side or the attackers closer to the middle on the side, forming a winger-like impact on the opponent's side defense.

Unlike wingers, wingbacks are a type of player who cannot completely replace a winger and only exist independently.

In English, the word wingback combines "Wing" and "Backfield" to form "Wing-Backfield", which is the WB that is usually found in FIFA games; This may be the collective name for wingbacks.

The full-backs will call him the "Left/Right Backfield", which is LB and RB.

The wing-backs are called "Wing-Midfield" or simply "Left/Right-Midfield", which is also known as a wing midfielder.

If we take the name in Chinese, some Chinese media will call the fullback "gate", the wingback or winger "wing or flying wing", and the wingback is a kind of player between the "gate/wing", which undertakes more complex defensive and offensive tasks than the wingback, and the main defense of the fullback is the same as the winger of the opponent, and at the same time pays more attention to the cooperation and contact with the midfield organizer or striker player, and its fundamental purpose is to share the promotion task of the organizer. This makes the playmaker more off-ball and improves the quality of the attack. According to the title, it should be "wings with more defensive contributions" or "more agile side gates".

To put it simply, a wingback is a type of player similar to the combination of attackers and defenders on the wing, who supports the attack more than full-backs, and can participate in defense more than wing-backs.

As a companion to the new three-centre-back tactic, the modern wing-back is more advanced than the full-back in the solidified five-back tactic, and is more aggressive and forward-oriented; Because the position is more closely connected and coordinated with the forward line, as a player in the wingback position, his winger's general frontcourt coordination ability, as well as the speed and endurance of the return defense are necessary.

Unlike Brazilian star Da Costa Jarre, the "ancestor" of wingbacks in the big international era, the wingbacks of modern football pay more attention to the use of the width of the pitch and the use of endurance.

It is somewhere between a full-back and a full-back, with a similar position to the midfielder and midfielder, with one more point of attack and dribbling than the full-back behind him, and one point more point of defense and retreat than the full-back in front of him.

However, this is the first time that a wing-back has been deployed in two central defenders, as there has never been a two-centre-back approach in world football since the demise of the 2-3-5 tactic. Even if it were a copy of the 2-3-5, this ancient formation would not have the position of wing-back.

It is said that Josep Guardiola's tactics are changeable, and on the basis of his predecessors, he has created many eye-catching tactics.

If the top tactician had known that Gunners manager Arsène Wenger, who is regarded as a stale and backward tactic by fans of the black fans, had created a two-centre-back tactic, he would have dropped his job and rushed to London, storming the Frenchman's office to learn about the retro yet eccentric 2-5-3 tactic.

"Hopefully, before retiring, this goalkeeper-centric tactic will lead the times." Standing in front of the window of his office, looking at the training ground in the setting sun, Wenger muttered to himself.