Dragon Slayer.

In this world, the difference between the strong and the weak in the greatest sense is ......

It is that no matter what the strong choose to do, they can always get relatively more recognition......

On the contrary, for the weak, sometimes, even if they do the right thing, they will inevitably face all kinds of setbacks and all kinds of cynicism......

In fact, in a real sense, in essence, this is also the gap that people naturally form in a certain way......

Although many people are reluctant to admit this natural gap, thinking that the so-called diligence can make up for the clumsiness, but in reality, the people who can make up for the clumsiness in the real sense are a minority of the minority, and it can even be said that being able to make up for the clumsiness itself can even be regarded as a talent......

In fact, sometimes, even if something is right, if it is done by different people, it will often have different effects......

Capable people are always easier to do things better and spread more positive energy, while incompetent people are often able to make a mess of the original good things without knowing it......

Of course, the vast majority of judicial cases in this world are relatively fair, and only in rare cases will there be some judicial injustice......

However, the injustice of such judicial decisions can often have a very serious negative impact on society......

In fact, every judicial ruling and sentencing is, in essence. It can all be a boost to people's trust in the country. An opportunity to enhance the positive energy in the hearts of the people......

And that's it. It also requires the judge to make the most appropriate judgment before it can be done!

If the sentence is too light, and a wicked person who should have been cut down by a thousand knives is sentenced to a crime that is not light or serious, it will naturally cause dissatisfaction among the people, and conversely, if the sentence is too heavy, in the case of insufficient evidence, a heavy punishment will be forcibly imposed. Only when the crime and punishment are equal to each other, will the people truly feel the fairness of the law, and will generate more positive energy in their hearts, and will not be afraid to fight against illegal acts!

To put it simply, an accurate trial and sentencing can often provide a lot of positive energy, while conversely, a wrong trial and sentencing often provides a lot of negative energy. Even in a certain sense, such a wrongful sentence is even more terrifying and angry than leaving the perpetrators with impunity......

A good judge is always able to find the most reasonable balance. The most ideal rulings make the people feel the justice of the law, but on the contrary, if it is an incompetent judge, then their judgment will often only provoke social conflicts......

Legally speaking, this kind of confused judge's behavior is not actually illegal, but in fact, their behavior is often more terrible than breaking the law and committing crimes, because the fault of the illegal form can often be punished by the law, but the fault that is not illegal is often not sanctioned, if there are more and more mistakes that are not illegal in a society, then the society will naturally enter an inexplicable panic, and the trust in the judiciary will also be greatly reduced......

In a certain sense, the existing legal system is, by and large, relatively balanced in terms of sentencing......

The most fundamental reason why people are dissatisfied with the sentencing of some relatively special crimes is not that there is an asymmetry between punishment and criminal behavior......

In fact, if it is purely from the perspective of the criminal, let alone the death penalty, even if it is a fixed-term imprisonment of three years, five years and ten years, for them, it can actually be regarded as a very, very, very severe punishment......

In other words, if we consider purely from the perspective of the existing punishment, if every offender will be sure to be 100% caught, then theoretically speaking, any criminal act is actually more than worth the loss!

Why, however, are there those who are willing to take the risk of committing a crime?

The most fundamental reason is not that the law is not strict enough, but simply because the judicial department is very weak in arresting criminals, and because of this inadequacy, almost all criminals, when committing crimes, rarely think about what kind of punishment they will face after being caught......

Legal punishment in modern society is, in a sense, very just, at least between the crime and the sentencing......

However, no matter how fair the law is, it must be done by law enforcers!

A just law is based on the fact that the vast majority of criminals can be brought to justice!

In the real world, not every kind of criminal will be easily caught!

Generally speaking, the perpetrator of a human life lawsuit is often more likely to be caught because the police will devote maximum force to the relevant case......

As for many other cases, some are difficult for the police to investigate, and some are impossible for the police to invest too much police force, and in such cases, the probability of the perpetrator being caught in the end will become very low......

And no matter how harsh the punishment is, if you can't catch someone, there is no point in it......

Especially those petty thefts, not only the probability of being caught is very low, even if they are caught, as long as the amount is not large, most of them will not be punished very strictly, which also makes the number of criminals in this category very large, because they always have two layers of psychological protection, one is that most of them will not be caught, and the second is that even if they are caught, they will not be punished too much, and under such a psychological effect, petty theft will naturally become rampant......

A lot of crime, in essence, pursues this low-risk crime model. They don't have to worry about what will happen to them if they get caught. Because they know very well that the probability of being caught is actually infinitely close to zero......

Thereinto. The most typical is the telephone fraud case, this kind of crime, it is almost difficult to be caught in the real sense, it can be called a typical sense of the criminal means that come and go without a trace, and even do not need to see the face of the victim, you can easily carry out the criminal method, and ensure that you are almost always in a state of zero risk......

And this is the reason why many people would rather take a felony than dare to commit a crime......

In fact. Human traffickers are a typical example of this type of crime......

From the perspective of crime, their profits are actually disproportionate to their sentences, once they are caught, the profits from the crime will not be too much, hundreds of thousands of hundreds of thousands of dollars have already reached the sky, but if multiple children are trafficked, most of the people waiting for them will undoubtedly be the death penalty......

However, from a security point of view, trafficking in human beings, especially the trafficking of children, is a form of trafficking. The risks are often not great, on the one hand. When buyers do not open their mouths, it is often very difficult for them to be caught, and many times, the attitude of the police towards missing persons often does not care too much, countless people are missing every day around the world, even if the police care, they can find a few, if it is kidnapping and extortion, the police can also have some clues, but purely sell children as goods, and then go away after getting rid of them, it is undoubtedly very, very difficult to catch such a person, and it can even be said that Without arranging some undercover agents to infiltrate the other party's organization, it is almost impossible to have a chance to crack this type of case......

And that's one of the reasons why people hate this kind of behavior!

Because this type of criminal is so difficult to be caught, many people think that once this kind of person is caught, he must be executed in order to be able to make his thoughts clear......

In fact, if in the final analysis, the risk of getting caught is different for each type of crime......

Although the law is fair, it does not really take into account the problem of different probabilities of criminal arrest......

And if it really wants to play a role in deterring criminals, then the punishment that those crimes with a lower probability of arrest need to bear should actually increase geometrically, and only in this way can the criminals be more or less deterred......

And the death penalty, in a certain sense, is the ultimate deterrent!

It's simple......

The reason why the offender commits a crime is often has two layers of psychological protection, one is that he feels that he will not be caught, and the second is that he feels that even if he is caught, most of them will not die, and even if the lawyer is strong, it is not impossible to escape punishment or be given a light sentence......

Under the effect of these two psychological protections, the offender will take the risk to commit a crime, the probability of this kind of thing, itself is like a need to multiply, if the probability of being caught is very low, and even if he is caught, the probability of being sentenced to a heavy sentence or the death penalty is also very low, after these two probabilities interact with each other, basically the offender can be said to be fearless, because deep in their hearts, the possibility of their own criminal behavior to bring disaster to themselves can be said to be very small......

That's when they become emboldened......

This is like everyone knows that if you look for a lady on the street, if you don't wear a condom, you may be infected with some venereal diseases, and even include a terminal illness that is enough to sentence a person to death, and you may also be caught by the police uncle, and one pass is more than half a year......

However, there will still be many people who are willing to do such a thing, and there are still many people who linger in the flower streets and willow alleys day and night, unable to extricate themselves......

Are they not afraid of death? Aren't you afraid of getting sick? Aren't you afraid of being caught by the police and then fined and detained?

Of course, they are afraid of these things, but they themselves are also very clear that the probability of these three situations is often very, very low, whether it is sick or caught, they all belong to the small probability of the small probability of the event, for the vast majority of prostitutes, such a small probability event, at best, is no different from being choked to death by eating, if you really encounter it, you can only consider yourself unlucky, but although you may choke to death when you eat, it is not possible to waste food due to choking, This is naturally very simple......

And in the process. They actually have a lot of psychological protection. First of all. The young lady you find yourself is not necessarily sick, secondly, the young lady you are looking for, even if she is sick, she may not be infected with herself, and third, even if she is sick. It is most likely that it will only be some small and small sexually transmitted diseases, and the probability of winning the jackpot with a terminal illness is even more minimal, under this layered psychological protection, even if there is a theoretical possibility that Zài will be directly sentenced to death by AIDS, they are still willing to live this kind of sleeping life......

And many offenders, their psychology before committing the crime, is often like this......

However, if the penalty for some crimes is directly raised to the death penalty, then it means that the perpetrator is initially psychologically protected. There will be a huge hole torn on the dù of a great distance!

The probability of being caught is indeed still not high, but once caught. It's certain death!

In such a state of mind, there are often very few people who really dare to take risks!

Compared with Hong Kong and Taiwan, the mainland's control over drugs is undoubtedly very strict, and the most crucial point is that the punishment for drug trafficking is very harsh, and it is almost a dead end if you are caught in drug trafficking......

And because of this, although drug traffickers are very rampant in Hong Kong and Taiwan, only a few of them dare to make waves on the mainland......

It is true that drug trafficking has very high profits, and it is true that if the means are secretive, the probability of being caught is not so high......

But once the death penalty is almost 100 percent on par, then the risk of such a crime rises exponentially!

Just like a man who wants to prostitute himself, he may sleep with any lady who looks healthy, or even without any safety measures, but if it is a young lady who is clearly sick, then even if a condom is provided, most of them will not be on it, the so-called not afraid of 10,000 is afraid of what if, many times, when the layer of psychological protection disappears, wanting to go further will naturally produce psychological disorders......

The same is true for criminals, under the premise that the police cannot arrest the criminals to the greatest extent, the law should formulate a relevant compensation system, and increase the punishment through guò, so as to punish some criminals who are lucky!

The so-called troubled times must use heavy canons, this is the truth!

The so-called troubled times are not necessarily how chaotic the world is, but simply refers to the large number of criminals and the difficulty of arresting them all......

The crimes committed by these criminal models themselves may not lead to death, but the crimes borne by the criminal models themselves are not only the crimes committed by themselves, but also the crimes of many other criminals who have not been caught!

Just like during the Strike Hard period, which is a typical example, many of the acts of all kinds of hooligans and gangsters should not be sentenced to death, and even some minor evil deeds that seem to modern people are not counted as strict at all, and almost all of them have been severely punished during the Strike Hard period......

In fact, this is also a typical representative of the repetition of the code in troubled times!

Although the criminal law has not been imposed on them, they themselves will restrain their own behavior and restrict their freedom, just like some cadres who have bad deeds on their own bodies, and they will always be vigilant against their own behavior and will not allow themselves to do something out of the ordinary as before......

In fact, this is also a typical embodiment of the role of law!

Although from the perspective of some modern people, it is true that cracking down on this kind of thing is indeed somewhat brutal, and it will even wronged many people, it is undeniable that such a heavy punishment has indeed greatly improved the bad atmosphere in society......

In modern society, many so-called experts and scholars are advocating the abolition of the death penalty, in fact, there is nothing wrong with abolishing the death penalty, but in modern times, where the probability of arresting criminals is not high, it is a very ridiculous practice......

However, the abolition of the death penalty must be based on the fact that the police can basically catch the vast majority of criminals, and only when every criminal is brought to justice will the so-called reciprocity of crime and sentencing be meaningful, otherwise. There is a frenzy of death penalty among the people. It still sweeps in from time to time......

In fact. The so-called death penalty itself is not simply against a single offender, but against a complete set of criminal acts!

Just like the theory of the death penalty for human traffickers, in essence, not everyone has a deep hatred for a fixed human trafficker, but people have a very strong hatred for this anti-human group, and people are disgusted by this kind of behavior. What is hated is the group itself, the collection of all the traffickers who have been captured and who have not been captured!

If every human trafficker, or more than 90 percent of human traffickers, can be caught, perhaps no one will advocate the argument that any human trafficker must be sentenced to death, because if the vast majority of criminals will be punished by law, then a person's perpetrators, their criminal acts, will only be responsible for their own mistakes, and will not have to pay for the mistakes of their peers......

And the anger of the people, the sentencing of the law. It will only target individual behavior, and will not extend to the entire group......

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

Dragon Slayer.

in this world. In fact, there has never been a so-called golden rule, anything, that can be broken......

Just like a law, a law that appears reasonable on the surface actually needs to be amended in a certain way according to reality......

A law-abiding law-enforcer who truly understands the law is often able to give full play to the flexibility of the law and achieve a punishment that can satisfy the wishes of the vast majority of people, while those who are stupid and incompetent will only enforce the law in accordance with the provisions of the law, and will not consider what kind of negative impact their actions will have on the vast majority of ordinary people......

Many people always say that public opinion is above the law and is a kind of regression of the judicial system......

However, they simply do not understand that the supremacy of public opinion over the law is a matter of course......

Because, the law itself is created by the will of the people!

Therefore, when public opinion changes, the law should naturally change, otherwise, the law will be completely overthrown and destroyed by the new public opinion, and then the new law will be established......

Some so-called legal experts always say that the majority agrees that the death penalty for the so-called traffickers is a tyranny of the majority......

However, they have never really understood the so-called tyranny!

In this world, the so-called tyranny itself will only be something that a few people insist on, and what the majority agrees with, and in the vast majority of the time, it will represent justice, absolute justice......

On the contrary, when a few people cling to it and think that it is righteous, in a certain sense, it is tyranny in the true sense!

Sometimes a tyrannical law is a tyranny because it violates the interests of an innocent people, but sometimes a tolerant law is also a tyranny because it also violates the interests of an innocent people......

From the perspective of many people, the rhetoric against the death penalty for human traffickers is a tyranny in the typical sense, a tolerance for those who are anti-human traffickers, a provocation and harm to those who truly love the world and yearn for peace, a kind of regression of civilization, and a distortion of human nature......

Perhaps in the eyes of those who are supposedly intellectual, this anger itself is incomprehensible, like that of fanatical brainwashed believers......

But, on the other hand, who has established an organization, a political power, and a state, has not had such a fanatical faith?

Perhaps, from another point of view, those who are really stupid, incompetent and corrupt may be those so-called legal experts who think they are superior, think that they are talented and excellent, and can calmly analyze right and wrong...... (To be continued......)