Temple of Stone. Pen, fun, and www.biquge.info

Humanity is a very mysterious concept......

In many cases, the difference between law and morality lies in whether it is humane or not......

Whether a thing seems right or wrong in the eyes of the vast majority of people depends to a large extent on whether it is humane......

As long as it is humane, whether it is illegal or not, it will be recognized by people, and conversely, inhumane behavior, even if it is legal, will be disgusted and condemned......

Just like the murderer who is also a murderer and chooses to kill because of his own selfishness, and those who are forced to fight back after being forced to the end of the road, the perpetrator can only fight back to kill, of course, is a completely different concept......

In many cases, the latter's behavior can be understood, recognized, and even considered a pleasurable practice......

On the contrary, the former is often always disgusting, especially because of trivial things, people who commit murderous and evil acts, the vast majority of people will stay away from them!

In many cases, the law only judges whether there is guilt or not, but ordinary people look at a matter more often than not......

There is a clear criterion for guilt, but right and wrong are natural for different people to have different opinions......

For the same criminal act, some people will feel that the sentence is too heavy, and some people will feel that the sentence is too light, in the final analysis, different people have different perceptions of the degree of harm of a behavior, and if they feel that the harm is serious, they naturally hope that the offender will be severely punished, and on the contrary, if they feel that the harm is average, they will feel that the excessive punishment will cause unnecessary social panic......

Of course, although there is no clear standard for humanity itself, and different people will have different opinions on the same thing, but no matter what, the cognitive tendency of the vast majority of people is still the same......

That is the most basic perception of right and wrong as a person......

To put it simply, it's the same thing, if a person does something wrong, then no matter what it is, at least in this general direction, there will be no error in judgment, the difference is only that they will feel that they have made such a mistake, whether they deserve it or that it is excusable, but no matter what, a mistake is a mistake, and this point is not allowed to change, and no one will excuse an obvious mistake......

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

Of course, there is a clear difference between the nature of the humanitarian order and the legal order......

In many cases, what is right in humanity is not necessarily legal, and what is not illegal in justice is not necessarily in line with the values of the vast majority of people......

The process of human development is in fact such a process of integration between humanity and law......

In the end, as long as humanity and law merge with each other, it will be legal to act in line with humanity, and acts that are not in accordance with humanity will be illegal, and if a society reaches such a height of civilization, then many disputes and ideological differences will no longer exist!

It's not complicated, but it's still very, very, very difficult to do!

The reason is very simple, in the final analysis, it is difficult for humanity to simply describe right and wrong, different people's views and standards on the same thing are not the same, in fact, it is because of this, there is the existence of the so-called law, the existence of the law, in the final analysis, is to give all right and wrong, to all moral concepts, set a standard......

Of course, the law also needs to be constantly amended through time, and people's moral concepts will continue to become more and more humane with the passage of time......

In a sense, the ultimate goal of any social order is a humane order......

The so-called humanity, in essence, is the rules that conform to the philosophy of all human behavior!

The so-called humanity must be in line with the behavior and philosophy of the vast majority of people!

It must be a rule that most people can naturally abide by even if they don't need to be widely advertised!

As long as the humanitarian order is observed, it will definitely make people physically and mentally satisfied and happy, and the final end of the law must be in harmony with humanity in the perfect sense!

In many cases, the word humanity also directly represents the most basic needs of the vast majority of people in life, that is, the so-called process of mating and reproduction......

Survival and reproduction are a basic need shared by all animals......

And for human beings who have established a civilized order and have basically no worries about survival, reproduction has naturally become their most basic demand!

And the so-called humanity is just that!

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

In fact, the contradiction between law and morality has always existed, and any contradiction will always be accompanied by the passage of time, and there will always be a final compromise on one side......

For example, many folk customs are actually very vulgar, for example, the custom of making a bride and a bridesmaid in some places is actually a typical conflict between traditional ideas and laws......

With the process of civilization, people recognize more reasonable and legal behavior patterns, and for some vulgar or even bad so-called custom behaviors, they will naturally resist them, and anyone who tries to commit obscene acts in the name of customs will eventually be punished by the law......

In the final analysis, this is actually a collision between a typical humane and traditional, whether the traditional customs need to continue, in essence, also depends on whether this custom is in line with the law of humanity, if it has the nature of insult, then this custom itself does not conform to the law of humanity, does not conform to the law of humanity, and naturally will not be recognized by the vast majority of people......

As people's awareness of dignity becomes more and more profound, all kinds of so-called customs with strong insulting properties will eventually be completely eliminated by history, because this custom itself is a betrayal of humanity itself!

And the betrayal of humanity is, in the final analysis, the betrayal of the entire human community!

In fact, the biggest problem in the existing judicial system is that it rarely thinks about issues and makes judgments from a truly humanitarian point of view......

Because of this, many behaviors that seem to ordinary people to be heinous are often just frivolous crimes in the law, and in the final analysis, they are actually ignoring the extraordinary human nature......

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

To give you a simple example......

Just like those telecom fraud cases, this kind of case itself, purely from the perspective of fraud, is actually very incorrect......

Because in the vast majority of typical fraud cases, fraudsters pretend to be public officials to commit fraud in the process of fraud, that is to say, this behavior itself is a huge damage to the credibility of the state......

From the perspective of ordinary fraud, some fraudsters may not have defrauded enough to impose a heavy sentence, but if the crime of impersonating a state official is added to it, it should be a very serious crime!

The public servants of the state represent the public power of a country, and the rights of the state itself are absolutely inadmissible!

The vast majority of people are deceived, many times not because their vigilance is not high enough, nor because of the leakage of their own identity information, but more because of a kind of trust in state officials!

Because the vast majority of people will subconsciously feel that no one will pretend to be a public servant of the state to deceive themselves, because the vast majority of people will subconsciously feel that this is a very, very, very serious crime, and no one will do this, because the cost of doing so must be very great......

However, in fact, many criminals have not been severely punished for this, and once the punishment is not severe, it is actually the order of the country itself and the credibility of the country that are really damaged!

However, if the state is powerless to do anything about it, even if the perpetrator is caught, it cannot be punished with a heavy sentence, then the negative impact of the state itself on the people will be very, very huge, because it means that the perpetrator can unscrupulously embezzle the name of the state to commit crimes, and more importantly, when the law enforcer really needs to use the telephone to communicate with the parties, Often, they are questioned or they simply hang up the phone completely......

From this point of view, compared with the fraud itself, the matter of impersonating a state official is the most damaging part of the humanitarian order in the real sense!

In the same way, acts such as human trafficking are actually also heinous crimes, which are not simply judged by the calculation of value, but the result of judging from a humanitarian point of view, everyone should be absolutely free in humanity, and should not be subject to any restrictions and controls, and any restrictions and controls and deprivation of life freedom itself should actually be the most serious criminal acts!

For example, human trafficking, such as illegal detention, in fact, from a humanitarian point of view, it should be an extremely serious crime, because this kind of behavior itself is a violation of the humanitarian order, but at the legal level, human trafficking sometimes does not punge death, as for illegal detention in many cases, it is even a sentence of about one year, in fact, this kind of punishment is obviously negligent in nature......

In a sense, the economic benefits of human trafficking are not high, but the social impact is several times greater than that of bank robbery, and such an act, even if it is shot 10,000 times, in a sense, is not much, because this is an act that completely deviates from the essence of human beings, and is a behavior model that completely subverts the humane order under the civilized system of modern society!

Illegal detention itself is not a very serious crime, but the crime of illegal detention itself is often accompanied by a series of criminal acts such as insults, beatings, robberies, and interrogations, and even the act of illegal detention itself, even if it is ignored, is actually a kind of great harm and oppression to the victim, and it can be said that illegal detention is the source of many criminal acts......

Many criminals in many MLM organizations, even if they have committed very bad acts in the course of committing crimes, are eventually convicted of illegal detention, which is obviously unreasonable from a legal point of view, and it is also the fundamental reason why MLM has always been repeatedly banned!

Any violent behavior, as long as it is dressed in the cloak of pyramid schemes, often becomes a little more civilized, even if the victim is obviously robbed, coerced and beaten before being forced to pay the money, in the eyes of the case-handling personnel, it will also become deceived money, you know, being defrauded of money and being robbed of money are two completely different concepts, being defrauded is one concept, being coerced is another concept, and the reason why some violent acts put on the cloak of pyramid selling, in essence, is to cover up the crime itself with a higher level of crime... …

In fact, in a sense, it is also a manifestation of the conflict between humanity and law...... (To be continued.) )