Temple of Stone. Pen @ fun @ pavilion wWw. ｂｉｑUｇE。 ｉｎｆｏ

In a sense, whether it is pretending to be a pig and eating a tiger, or the so-called eyes do not know Mount Tai, in essence, it is actually inhumane behavior......

From the perspective of the mentality of those in high positions, he has no reason to pretend to be ordinary people, even if they are micro-obedient and private, they will not do anything inconsistent with their pretending identity......

For example, if they are wearing ordinary clothes, they will not go out and out of various high-end places as they normally would, and they will only do things that are consistent with their identity......

After all, the so-called golden mean, in essence, is based on the right way, what kind of identity a person has, he should make a behavior that matches and conforms to his own identity, so that it will be in line with the cognition of the society, and will be recognized by others, and on the contrary, if a person's identity and his behavior are not consistent with each other, then it is easy to be questioned and doubted......

Just like if a person says that he is a local tyrant, but he has no car, no brand-name clothes and watches, and no driver and secretary, then it is undoubtedly very unconvincing......

Of course, the reason why those so-called dog blood bridges appear is that in addition to this factor, there are also other factors, that is, the so-called doorman or waiter dog looks down on people......

If a person is despised and despised by others because of his inappropriate clothing or inappropriate words and deeds, then this person should naturally be held responsible, because this kind of behavior itself is actually not in accordance with the humane order, just like some overly dressed women on the street, they will always be considered to be engaged in some improper occupations, and many people feel that this suspicion is a kind of discrimination against others, but in a sense, it is not unreasonable......

People will always have some conventional cognition of other people's clothing, sexy dress and coquettish dress, are also two completely different concepts, most of the time, on the street, those clothes are too revealing, at least part of the proportion, is definitely engaged in those special occupations of the people, because ordinary people, even if they want to highlight their charm, will not use some too extreme clothing......

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

On the contrary, if a person has done all the parts he should do, dressed, said and acted consistently, then such a person should be respected and respected......

And if you still have a contemptuous or contemptuous attitude towards such a person, then it is also a violation of humanity and humanity......

In the final analysis, no matter what kind of thing it is, there is always a right and wrong, and there is always a scale......

Just like any alternating accident in reality, it is bound to be the responsibility of one or both parties, as for which party is more responsible in the accident, or the full responsibility of one party, it is natural to need to be determined according to traffic laws, which is beyond doubt......

However, compared with the law, humanity itself is a relatively vague concept, and if both parties are at fault in a matter, then it is more difficult to weigh the concept of whose fault is greater and whose fault is smaller......

However, no matter how difficult it is to weigh, the vast majority of people, when judging right and wrong, will always have a relatively unified standard, which is completely different from the law, and is completely a concept of judging right and wrong from a humane perspective......

To give you a simple example......

What kind of punishment should a person be punished for stealing a dog thief?

If, from a legal point of view, in the final analysis, it is just stealing other people's property, if it is just a worthless dog, then the dog thief will not get too heavy a sentence for this, and may not even meet the standard of stealing......

However, if from a humanitarian point of view, dog thieves are actually very, very hateful in the hearts of many people, to what extent are they hateful? There was once a news that a group of dog thieves accidentally pricked themselves when they used a poison needle to kill dogs, and finally died of poison......

This is undoubtedly a relatively unlucky thing, but in the comments of the people, no one feels that these two people died very unjustly, and more people feel that the dog thief was poisoned by his own poisonous dog needle, which is a deserved thing!

Yes, the sin deserves it!

In other words, in the potential consciousness of the vast majority of people, the person who steals the dog, even if he pays for the dog's life, is just a crime that he deserves!

This is where the contradiction between humanity and the law lies, in the law it is only a petty theft and a crime that does not even meet the standard of the case, but in the concept of human nature, this kind of behavior is more than innocent!

In the same way, there are also things like cheating on women......

From the perspective of real law, a woman's cheating is not actually a crime, let alone an illegal act, at best, it is just a violation of morality......

However, from a humanitarian point of view, this behavior is difficult to tolerate!

In ancient times, women were immersed in pig cages or burned to death because of cheating or unmarried pregnancy, it can be said that there are absolutely not a few, in that era, this kind of behavior seems to people, itself is a matter of course, women cheating, being beaten to death is deserved, this concept is also deeply rooted in the hearts of the people......

And this extreme concept will naturally not still exist in modern society, but in any case, the vast majority of people still do not have any good feelings about such behavior......

Even, in modern society, if a man chooses to kill his wife because of his wife's cheating, he may not be attacked by everyone, and may even be supported by some people, because under such hatred and humiliation, there is actually no reason for a man to make any choice......

And if a man faces this situation and chooses to be submissive, such a man will be considered a wreck by the vast majority of people and unworthy of being a man......

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

Although modern society has long openly preached the equality of men and women, in fact, men still dominate the society, men's cheating is more often only considered to be romantic, and women's cheating is often considered a very serious moral flaw, and even at the legal level, people are more inclined to let cheating women be completely cleaned......

At the end of the day, it's part of humanity......

This humane order itself is actually a long process of accumulation......

Similar to this situation, there are many other realities......

For example, if the person who is beaten is an innocent female student, then the vast majority of people will have a certain amount of sympathy for the girl, believing that severe sanctions must be imposed on the beater, so as to truly calm the people's anger and be able to set the record straight......

However, if it is a thief who is beaten, the vast majority of people will not have such an idea, as long as they are not directly killed, the vast majority of people will still agree with this act of beating thieves, although there will be some moral gentlemen who jump out and say that they want to do things according to law, but the vast majority of people will still expect this way to vent their resentment and dissatisfaction with the thief profession in their hearts......

And if it is a human trafficker who is beaten, then I am afraid that the vast majority of people will feel that even if such a person is killed, he deserves it, and the person who beats the trafficker to death is not only not a criminal act, but a heroic act, which should be commended......

In the final analysis, beating people is a crime in itself, but under different environments and different targets, it is the same beating, and in humanity, it is given a completely different concept!

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

In the same way, the same goes for revenge!

Whether the act of revenge is righteous or not, in essence, depends on the scale of revenge itself!

All hatred in this world is, in the final analysis, nothing more than cause and effect!

What you sow, what you get!

If the cause and effect are equal, then after the revenge is over, people will have a clear mind, and conversely, if revenge is excessive, then hatred will produce new hatred, and thus become a situation of retribution......

To give you a simple example......

In the Eight Divisions of the Heavenly Dragon, it is actually a story of a cycle of hatred......

Taking Xiao Yuanshan as an example, the source of hatred is because of the interception and killing of their family of three by the martial arts heroes......

The hatred of killing his wife and taking his son can naturally be regarded as a disagreement......

So for him, even if he will only do a lot of revenge and kill a lot of relevant people, such an act itself can only be regarded as a legitimate revenge act......

In this matter, he is actually not wrong, because his revenge is always within a reasonable scale, to say that the only flaw is nothing more than killing Qiao Feng's adoptive father and adoptive mother, in addition, among the people killed by him, there is almost nothing that can be regarded as innocent......

And for those martial arts heroes, they were killed by Xiao Yuanshan, but strictly speaking, the source of their hatred should be the leading brother at that time, that is, the abbot of Shaolin Temple......

And Xuan Ci of Shaolin Temple, if you want to choose a hateful target, then there is no doubt that it is Murong Bo......

However, Murong Bo faked his death, so that Xuan Ci could only make himself the end of the hatred between Xiao Yuanshan's father and son, so it also led to a series of stories......

In a sense, the source of all hatred is actually on Murong Bo, who is faked to death!

In this process, the revenge of the vast majority of people is reasonable and justifiable, no one is a good person in the true sense, but there is no evil person in the real sense!

Such an act of revenge itself is actually a humane act!

(To be continued.) )