In fact, in the real world, in cases such as kidnapping, in a sense, police intervention itself is actually a threat to hostages......

If the victim's family really has enough money, they will not choose to let the police intervene, but will choose to call the police and let the police investigate after paying the ransom and recovering the hostages......

It's simple......

Whether it is for the kidnapper or the family of the kidnapper, if they can easily pay the ransom, it is actually the most ideal option to trade directly with the kidnapper, because this kind of transaction itself is the best option for the kidnapper and the hostage......

And once the police get involved, the situation will become unpredictable, especially many kidnappers will declare on the phone that as long as they call the police, they will definitely tear up the ticket, although in the TV series, this situation basically will not happen, even if the kidnapper's family calls the police, the kidnappers will basically not tear the ticket directly, but this is just the need of the plot, and in reality, many times, for their own safety, after finding out that the other party called the police, they usually choose to tear the ticket and give up the kidnapping......

In a sense, choosing to report to the police after a family member has been kidnapped is actually a correct behavior, but this correct behavior itself is actually based on the position of society and the police......

Whether it is for the police or for other people in society, if someone is kidnapped, they must hope that the family of the kidnapped person can call the police, and at the same time hope that the police can bring the kidnappers to justice or even kill them on the spot, because this is a great benefit to the social order, and it is also a potential deterrent to the perpetrators......

In fact, in many cases, the police usually lose more than they gain by solving the case, that is to say, the resources they spend are often much more than the illegal profits that the offender wants to obtain, but for the police, the reason why they would rather invest a lot of manpower, financial and material resources to solve the case is that the fundamental reason is to maintain the law and discipline, so that the offender can consider the strength of the law enforcer before committing the crime, and be afraid of it, so as to subtly reduce the possible criminal behavior in the future......

The more elite the police in a region, the higher the crime solving rate, the more iron-blooded the law enforcement methods, and the fewer criminals who dare to commit crimes in this area......

In the same way, in the case of kidnapping, the position of the police is, of course, to hope that the victim's family will call the police for assistance, because every time the police get more clues, the probability of solving the case will be greatly increased......

In the process of solving the case, the ideal situation is of course to be able to rescue the hostages and arrest or kill the criminals at the same time, the reason is very simple, if the police can rescue the hostages, then when other people are kidnapped in the future, the probability of family members reporting the case will be invisibly improved, and the public's trust in the police will also be improved, and the arrest or killing of criminals is a deterrent effect for other potential criminals......

In both cases, the former and the latter are actually about the same priority, and although the police will say that the safety of the hostages is above all else, in fact, many of them seem to take a certain amount of risk to the hostages......

In fact, the very act of the police intervening in the case will naturally pose a certain threat to the safety of the hostages......

However, from the perspective of social order and judicial order, both ordinary people and the police certainly hope that the police can intervene in the case and solve the case smoothly, because this means that the police are not a vulnerable group without resistance when facing the perpetrators, and they can only compromise and pay ransom......

In fact, in many kidnapping cases, if conditions permit, the family usually does not choose to call the police until the hostage is ransomed......

If the family calls the police, there are usually only two situations: first, they do not particularly care about the life and death of the kidnapped person, and second, although they care about the life and death of the kidnapped person, they have no way to collect the ransom required by the gangsters.

As for the victim's family being a police officer themselves, or the victim's family's friend happens to be a police officer, this situation will only appear in TV dramas, and it will not appear in reality......

In a sense, violent crimes such as kidnapping, murder, armed robbery, etc., are actually relatively harmful to society......

In particular, if a person with professional military training engages in related criminal activities, it is often enough to cause very great damage to the social order......

To take a simple example, if a serial murder case is not solved within a certain period of time, it is often easy to trigger various social incidents, which will make many people who meet the conditions of the victim feel panic......

As long as the murderer is not really caught, the longer the time drags on, the easier it is to make people feel frightened and even cause social unrest......

And because of this, all those major and important homicide cases, especially major homicide cases, are usually issued by the superior leaders to solve the case within a time limit, if the case cannot be solved within a period of time, the relevant investigators will be hung up......

In many cases, it is precisely because of this pressure to solve cases within a time limit that some police officers frequently use some torture methods during interrogation, resulting in some unjust, false and wrongful cases......

In fact, the vast majority of unjust, false and wrongly decided cases themselves are usually those big and important cases that are relatively bad in nature, because only such cases will be ordered to be solved within a limited time, and only cases that have been ordered to be cracked within a limited time will there be more or less unjust, false and wrongly decided cases......

Generally speaking, the existence of the judicial system is still to safeguard the interests of the vast majority of the people, and it is still necessary for the vast majority of the people to feel safe and secure enough......

The crimes of ordinary people, except for a very small number of high-IQ criminals, the vast majority of criminals, their crimes are usually very stupid......

The reason why they are stupid is not because of the modus operandi or the reason for the crime, etc., but simply because when they commit a crime, they never consider that they may go to prison for committing a crime......

And if there is a high probability that a crime will be caught and sentenced by the police, then a reasonable person should not commit such a crime, and the perpetrators who can commit such a crime can only be said to be stupid......

Many people always feel that they can carry out the so-called perfect crime, and can quietly escape the pursuit under the police questioning, but in fact, the vast majority of ordinary people do not have the ability to confront the police, a sophisticated interrogation expert, when interrogating ordinary people, there is no need to use any illegal or violent torture methods, you can easily use words to defeat the logic of the other party, you can easily find out the flaws and loopholes of the other party to attack, and easily let the other party tell the truth... …

In fact, many novice offenders always think that they will be able to clear their suspicions in front of the police, and then talk about their alibi, or other evidence that can prove their innocence, or try to explain their innocence from a logical point of view, trying to get the approval of the police......

It's like all kinds of criminals in Conan, who are usually very active and talkative, even if they are questioned by detectives, they often try to seek counterattacks, trying to find loopholes in the other party's reasoning, and many times, loopholes are exposed when they speak!

And the really clever criminals, even if they are caught by the police, they will make the most perfect response!

And the most perfect way to deal with interrogation, in the end, there are only two words, silence!

Yes, silence!

In the face of interrogation, it is actually very dangerous to say anything, regardless of whether the person himself has committed a crime or not, speaking may bring risks to himself, and the safest way is actually to remain silent until the lawyer comes, and then after communicating with the lawyer, after careful consideration, and then throw out what he "knows......

In fact, in many Western police and gangster films, when the police arrest the criminal, they will say that you have the right to remain silent, but everything you say may become evidence in court, which is actually a typical obligation to inform, if the police do not say such a sentence to the suspect, then all subsequent confessions will become invalid, because if the police do not inform the relevant information, it is equivalent to the existence of a potential intention to induce confessions......

In fact, silence is precisely the best way for suspects to deal with the police......

Regardless of whether the perpetrator is the perpetrator or not, and whether the police have relevant evidence, silence is a way to minimize the probability of a crime......

As for the kind of plot like in a cartoon, where the suspect has to confront the police or detectives at every turn, or the perpetrator who simply admits directly after being identified, it is actually very stupid, and in reality, no one will do this......

Veteran offenders actually know very well that choosing silence is always the safest, and once you open your mouth, you will never know how much information you will expose to the police with your words......

In fact, for really clever interrogation experts, as long as the suspect is willing to speak, no matter what the other party says, it will be beneficial to themselves, they can find a reasonable way to pry open the other party's mouth, at least in the communication, they can find what the other party cares about, what the other party needs, so as to communicate in a targeted manner, so as to obtain useful information......

In fact, the vast majority of suspects who have been caught are basically difficult to clean up their suspicions, although the spirit of justice is the concept of never suspecting guilt, but the premise is that the suspect must have a certain ability to commit crimes, and can not leave completely unexplained evidence, and for the vast majority of ordinary people, they undoubtedly do not have such ability......

Therefore, because of this, in a city with strict judicial order, the vast majority of criminals can be brought to justice, and the police will not easily make any compromises with criminals at any time and on any occasion......

Even if they have to pay much more than the proceeds of the criminals' crimes, they will not hesitate in the slightest, because they represent the power of order, and if they cannot suppress criminal behavior, then the security order of society will be subverted, which is absolutely intolerable!

The superiors of any country are almost intolerant of all the criminal acts in a country, not because of how bad the criminal acts themselves are, but because every time the criminal acts occur, they are actually subverting the original harmonious social order......

The people of a country always have the difference between people with different moral levels, some people have a higher moral level, some people have a lower moral level, these are understandable things, but as long as you abide by the laws of a country, the so-called law does not prohibit it, then you can be regarded as law-abiding and good citizens, even if there is a lack of morality, but it is still within the scope of what the social order can tolerate!

However, the act of crime itself can be said to be beyond the scope of the social order, and the law is not necessarily just, but at least it is something that the vast majority of people agree with and are willing to abide by......

When the state has sufficient capacity to suppress such acts, the state naturally wants to crack down on such criminal acts, and the stronger a country is and the more harmonious the social order of a country, the greater the crackdown on such criminal acts......

On the contrary, in the more chaotic the country, such as many wars and turmoil, and even in the country environment where warlords are divided, all kinds of crimes will become endless, and even crimes carried out in the name of the state will occur from time to time......

However, after all, order can only constrain ordinary people......

The transcendent is different after all!