Temple of Stone. Pen ~ fun ~ pavilion www.biquge.info

In fact, there is no way to define good people and evil people in a simple way......

Because a lot of this, there is a cause and effect!

In the modern judicial system, it is often only based on behavior but not too much causality, which leads to the problem of too light or too heavy sentences in many judicial cases......

To give you a simple example......

The same is killing, killing people because of their greed, and being forced to resist and kill because they are oppressed, from the legal level, are all crimes, but the former is a crime in a sense, in the cognition of the vast majority of people, and the latter is nothing more than being forced to helpless......

Although this kind of helplessness is not the kind of situation where you are forced to kill people by a knife on your neck, in fact, it is often more helpless than the kind of knife on your neck!

Just like in reality, many people who are forced to commit suicide by jumping off a building in debt, do they really want to die, in the final analysis, it is nothing more than that they are under too much pressure, and they can only die once, that's all......

On the contrary, if it is a criminal act that is forced to do so, as long as there is a logical and absolute causal relationship, it is often an act that can be forgiven, and even arouses sympathy......

It's a simple cause and effect!

At the level of law, the causal relationship in the crime is often not within the scope of the law, that is, because of this, all direct homicide will be defined as a crime, and those indirect acts that have a huge adverse impact are often difficult to convict, or it is difficult to be convicted in a nature that conforms to the real harm of the offender......

Here's a simple example......

From a legal point of view, the fraudster is only guilty of fraud, as for the suicide of the elderly, there may be a certain causal relationship with fraud, but even if this causal relationship is established, it only makes the nature of the fraudster's crime worse, but there is no way, and it is impossible for the fraudster to obtain the equivalent of murder......

However, from the perspective of causality, if the suicide factors of other elderly people are excluded, then this kind of fraud is essentially no different from intentional homicide!

Yes, there is no difference!

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

Just like the case of a loan shark forcing people to die, in fact, it also needs to be considered in different situations......

If the person who jumps off the building borrows money for his own reasons, and knows the high interest rate of the money he borrows, then he must be responsible for his own actions, no matter what kind of means the loan shark uses to force him, as long as it does not involve criminal acts, then he himself will eventually jump off the building, and he will be to blame......

Whether he borrows money to gamble or does something else, as long as he can't pay back in the end, it's his own problem......

In terms of causality, this is the so-called self-inflicted sin......

On the contrary, if the borrower who jumped off the building and committed suicide was deceived by the other party in the process of borrowing, then he finally chose to commit suicide, from the perspective of causality, he is not fully responsible, although he still bears a relatively heavy responsibility in this process, but there is no doubt that the fraud group and loan shark group that set the trap to defraud, He must also bear some responsibility for his death......

After all, many things in this world actually have potential cause and effect!

The order of the law makes law enforcers pay little attention to these potential causal relationships, but simply convict from superficial behaviors, and such convictions are naturally easy to produce a situation where the harm of the crime itself does not match the final sentence of the crime......

In many cases, there will also be the problem of too light or too heavy a sentence!

To give a simple example, when I was a child, many people should have watched a lot of Hong Kong and Taiwan TV dramas, many of which should also involve the court and trials, especially the topics related to legal affairs......

Among them, the verdicts of many cases are actually very incredible......

In many cases, the suspect has confessed his own charges when he has been arrested, thinking that he killed the victim, and then the protagonist's lawyer came out to find out the suspicions little by little, and finally overturned the homicide case, so that the suspect was acquitted and freed......

The plot seems to be very powerful, but from a judicial point of view, it is undoubtedly very unreasonable......

The approximate plot is like this, the victim is the suspect's father, because he has abused his wife and children since childhood, so his wife and children have not dared to resist the victim, and finally one day, the son can't stand the bullying of his father, so he angrily hit his father on the head with a bat, and saw his father fall to the ground and did not move, so the son thought his father was dead, so he ran away with his mother, but in the end he was caught......

There is no doubt that this was a motive and an act of killing......

And what is the problem that the lawyer finds in the end?

The lawyer eventually proved that the suspect did not kill the victim at that time, and that the victim died because when he got up, he accidentally stepped on a skateboard, fell again, and hit his head on the floor and died......

In the end, through authoritative proof, this view was proved to be correct, and the suspect was released......

Actually, this is a very nonsense thing......

In the final analysis, there is an absolute causal relationship between the victim's death and the suspect's lethal assault, although the victim did not die at the time, but he was already in a trance and unstable center of gravity because of the heavy blow to the head, under this premise, the victim will step on the skateboard and fall himself to death, that is to say, there is an absolute causal relationship between the victim's death and the suspect's attack!

Under the premise that there are no other external factors, the suspect's behavior is actually a kind of homicide in essence, although the reason for the murder can be said to be extenuating, although the direct cause of the final death is not because of the attack itself, but in the final analysis, there is still a direct causal relationship......

This is the difference between the legal and humanitarian aspects of the determination of a matter!

At the legal level, as long as there is no absolute causal relationship between the death of one person and another person, the person's guilt will be greatly reduced, and even acquittal......

But on a humanitarian level, as long as there is even the slightest relationship, we must bear this cause and effect!

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

The so-called I don't kill Beren, but Beren died because of me, that's the truth!

Implicit in this is the idea of causality at the humanitarian level......

Right and wrong at the legal level and right and wrong at the humanitarian level are two completely different concepts!

Back to the point of view of revenge......

The act of revenge, in the humane order, is a very legitimate act, an act that can be fully understood, and even fully recognized......

Even, in some cases, some revenge is often considered noble......

is like the revenge of the prince in many Western stories, which is often recognized by the vast majority of people as a righteous act......

But on a legal level, the vast majority of revenge is illegal......

Taking Tianlong Babu as an example, from a legal point of view, all martial arts masters, in essence, are actually murderers......

However, even among a group of murderers, there are always so-called righteous paths and demonic paths......

The so-called righteous path is not that they do not kill, but that their behavior is bound by certain norms, or that they naturally abide by the order of some good camps, even if it is an act of revenge, they will not harm those who are completely innocent, and this kind of revenge is often an admirable act......

In fact, in the vast majority of martial arts novels, revenge is an eternal theme!

The difference is that the moral level shown by decent characters in revenge will always make people sincerely admire, while the so-called revenge of those villains is often disgusting to the extreme!

For example, the same revenge, Xiao Yuanshan's revenge and Ye Erniang's revenge are completely different concepts!

――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――― ―――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――――

In many cases, the essence of humanity is actually a pattern of behavior and norms that conform to the cognition of the vast majority of people......

If the vast majority of people can agree with a norm, then that norm is, in a sense, the so-called humanitarian order!

Of course, the humanitarian order cannot be changed or even reversed, but if you want to change the humanitarian order, the difficulty is actually very huge, and there must be a strong enough figure to implement a certain system, so that it is possible to fundamentally change the concept of the vast majority of people in a real sense......

And the vast majority of people, in society, are often just able to go with the flow......

The mainstream values of society will always affect the vast majority of ordinary people, so that they will gradually form similar values in society......

Just like people's views of celebrities, people in the past called this type of person an actor, which was considered to be the lowest profession and belonged to the category of the lower ninth-rate, but in the eyes of modern people, actor is a profession with a certain social status and social influence......

In the final analysis, the transformation from a drama to a star is actually a manifestation of the progress of civilization.

The higher the development of a world's civilization, the more it will be able to accommodate more outstanding people from all walks of life and in various fields, and shine their own light......

The higher the development of material civilization, the greater people's demand for spiritual civilization will be, and the more attention will be paid to spiritual satisfaction......

This is also an inevitability of the development of civilization!

(To be continued.) )