Readx;?genius one second to remember, for you to provide you with a wonderful novel to read. Pen "Fun" Pavilion www.biquge.info

Temple of Stone.

In reality, many experts and scholars are always making various analyses and criticisms of the problem of indifference in society......

I feel that this is a regression of human civilization and a lack of morality......

But in fact, in the final analysis, human behavior itself is always related to the rule of law!

No matter what people's moral level is, the vast majority of people in this world always behave within the scope permitted by the law, and the so-called law does not prohibit it!

As long as it is not prohibited by law, and you can get benefits, there will naturally be people willing to do it!

And sometimes, if the interests reach a certain level, even if the law is violated in a sense, there will be people who are willing to do it!

And if an act that clearly violates the law and can obtain benefits, but will not be punished by the law, then it is often easy to produce a kind of value guidance to guide people to do such things......

It's like the question of whether the elderly should be helped......

In such incidents, the most fundamental reason why many old people choose blackmail is not simply because their moral character is corrupted, but more often, it is just a choice to push the boat with the current......

When many old people make this choice, they are not full of malice, nor do they want to do it from the beginning!

In many cases, it's just a way to push the boat......

Many old people were hit after they did not wake up, so the family unscrupulously angered the rescuer, and even framed the rescuer, in this case, the old man does not need to say that he was hit by the other party, just need to say that he does not remember, the rest of the matter will naturally be dealt with by the family, this is also a choice that can be attacked, retreated and defended, will let the rescuer naturally fall into injustice......

The reason why the old man made such a choice is, in the final analysis, because of several reasons......

First of all, in the face of high medical costs, the elderly feel that they cannot afford it, and they are not willing to let their families bear it, so they subconsciously want to find a target to transfer the responsibility, and subconsciously want to find an object that can share the responsibility......

Just like the family members of many patients, because the patients eventually died in the rescue, they subconsciously became angry with the doctor who rescued them, thinking that the doctor killed their family......

However, this is not the case in practice......

The actual situation is that the vast majority of the patient's family members are very clear, in fact, the doctor is innocent, the reason why the patient died, is simply because of the serious injury, many times, some of the victims' families, the reason why there is this kind of anger, is only because they can't find the party, because they can't find the perpetrator, so they are full of anger and anger, and they subconsciously vent to the doctor, although this anger itself at this time is unreasonable, However, many people are still willing to indulge their own feelings, and even subconsciously produce an illusion that their own behavior itself is an illusion of justice......

In the same way, the same is true for many elderly people......

When they are faced with a choice, they always subconsciously want to reduce the losses of their families due to their injuries, so they subconsciously want to find someone to pass on their losses, and when the real perpetrator cannot be found, they naturally aim at the rescuer......

This mentality itself is of course very stupid, but it is also a mentality that many people have......

It's like in ancient times, a small village came to an outsider......

Before the outsider came to the small village, the small village had been peaceful, but after the outsider came to exist, the small village was always harassed by all kinds of wild beasts and attacks, and the people suffered heavy losses......

As a result, the people of the small village will naturally have a grudge against outsiders!

This kind of resentment itself should not exist......

Because of the matter itself, it obviously has nothing to do with outsiders......

Almost everyone knows this......

However, many times, many people will naturally have such an idea, before this outsider came, the village was fine, as soon as the outsider came, all kinds of things happened in the village, this outsider must be a broom star-like existence......

In this way, the next thing is naturally to make all kinds of difficulties for outsiders, and even the expulsion of outsiders!

This kind of expulsion is often unjustified in itself, but it is real......

The responsibility for this matter is not actually on the outsider, but the outsider is the only channel for the villagers to vent their anger!

After all, there is no such thing as a beast that can vent any anger......

The same is true of natural disasters......

When people encounter a huge earthquake, the first thing they want to condemn is not the ruthless disaster of nature, but the people of the earthquake bureau, who feel that since it is the earthquake bureau, it should have the ability to warn of earthquakes in advance, and if they fail to do this well, it is naturally the responsibility of the relevant departments......

Of course, it has to be said that this kind of questioning itself is not unreasonable......

At least in a sense, the occurrence of an earthquake without any warning is essentially the responsibility of some of the earthquake-related departments......

But in fact, the greatest responsibility is the law of nature itself!

However, no one can hold nature responsible, so they subconsciously want to vent their anger on specific people......

In the end, it's nothing more than a form of anger......

For example, if a doctor can't save a patient who is going to die, and the police fail to catch the murderer, many times they will become the target of condemnation, and sometimes even the condemnation of them goes beyond the condemnation of the perpetrators of the crime......

In essence, everyone knows that such condemnation is unjustified, but it does produce such emotions......

Between natural disasters and man-made disasters, although they are both disasters, man-made disasters are disasters that can be investigated, but natural disasters cannot, that is, because of this, when natural disasters and man-made disasters are combined, people always pay more attention to pouring their anger on the part of man-made disasters, and many times they are often just angry......

In the same way, the old man was hit by someone, and there was naturally anger in his heart, and under the premise that the perpetrator was unknown, there was a relevant person who came out, and they naturally had to hold on to it, at least before the real perpetrator appeared, they needed to have an outlet to vent their anger in their hearts, and they needed to have an object that took financial responsibility for their families, so framing or acquiescing naturally became a natural behavior......

In many cases, such behavior is not good, but it is not evil in the pure sense, but more of an act of self-interest on a neutral level!

Yes, self-interested behavior!

In the humane order, human behavior is always biased towards self-interest!

As long as you do something, it has certain benefits for yourself, and there are not too many risks, many people will rush to it......

And if the benefits are big enough and the risks are much smaller, there will be people willing to try it!

Here's a simple example......

Gambling is known to be a very harmful recreational activity......

Many people who are more self-disciplined almost never participate in any gambling activities......

The vast majority of people in this world know the truth of nine cheats......

However, even gambling can attract people to the hand as long as there is a certain ratio between the chips and the profits......

To give you a simple example......

Normal gambling is often a 50% probability, buy one and lose one......

This is gambling in the standard sense, and professional gamblers, through their own gambling skills, will adjust this ratio in their favor, for example, they can improve their winning rate through a variety of calculations, such as blackjack and other games, by calculating the size and number of points of the cards consumed, in fact, you can calculate the probability of your next card appearing big and small cards, as long as their memory and calculation ability is good enough, even if it is a relatively brainless gambling game like blackjack, It can also make gamblers make a lot of money......

If ordinary people gamble, their winning rate is often far less than 50%, even if the casino itself does not cheat, the probability of the player losing money is always much greater than that of the banker......

And the casino itself is always profitable......

In the final analysis, whether gambling is worth it or not, in essence, depends on the profit rate after all considerations!

If there is a 50% chance of getting double the original stack, then it is a standard game......

And if it is a higher probability of win, then the reward will be reduced, and if it is a house, if it is a lower probability of win, then the reward will be increased......

(To be continued.) )

Mobile phone users should browse and read for a better reading experience.