Patrick Vieira is red-carded and will be banned for one game.

And in the post-match report, Jack recounted Vieira's incident. The report is serious. Anyway, Vieira's words, Jack wrote them without pulling a word.

The FA was furious, and so was the referees.

Since the introduction of the "E-2" rule, the FA and the refereeing committee are looking for a target to target. It's just that the Premier League clubs are smart and the Premier League players are smart.

None of them want to fall prey to the rules, so they are honest and avoid them.

Unexpectedly, in the fourth round, someone finally hit the muzzle. And he is also a person of no low status, Arsenal's midfielder Patrick Vieira.

And Vieira is more arrogant.

In post-match media interviews, Vieira did not say anything about his insults to the referee. But he said that "he will not change his style of play".

This kind of inconsistent remarks made the media over-interpret.

According to the media, this is Vieira's dissatisfaction with the referee on duty. He didn't think he was wrong to insult the referee on duty.

That's the media.

Maybe it's what Vieira wants to say, and the media is the right interpretation. Of course, it is also possible that Vieira did not mean that at all, but was so distorted by the media.

As one person said.

What is a classic.

The classics are nothing, but after being over-interpreted, various classic connotations are interpreted. And then it's packaged as a classic. Originally, many novels, movies, and many things that even the original author and director did not think of, were interpreted by many people. Then the more you interpret it, the deeper the connotation of the novel or the movie. And then these things slowly became the so-called classics.

This time Vieira's words were the same.

It was interpreted by various media, and finally people interpreted Vieira as a confrontation with the FA and the referee committee. Vieira was unhappy with the FA and referees' 'E-2' rules. It's getting more and more outrageous anyway.

The FA and the referee committee originally wanted to catch a typical example, and Vieira's matter was so big that they simply made a heavy hand. Two days after the game, the FA handed down the penalty for Patrick Vieira.

According to the "E-2" rules, Vieira abused the referee during the match and was suspended for three games.

Arsenal were not satisfied and immediately appealed.

Not just the red card of Vieira, but also Kanu's fake fall. Arsene Wenger faced reporters after the fight and gave his classic defence to the fake fall.

"I didn't see it, I need to go see the replay."

This is Arsene Wenger's most formulaic answer. Every time it felt like Arsenal was profiting or Arsenal players were doing something wrong, he would say "I don't see it".

"Fake fall!"

"Fake falls in English football are becoming more and more common, and I think there should be more penalties for fake falls. Fake fall is a provocation to the referee, but also a provocation to sportsmanship. If he is allowed to fall, he will ruin the entire Premier League. ”

"I think you get the benefits of faking a fall, like a penalty, a red card for the opposing player, and so on. The FA and the refereeing committee should impose additional penalties on such players after the game. This unsportsmanlike thing must be cracked down on in order to restore the fairness of the game. ”

When someone on Arsenal's side shouted against Kanu, Jack immediately countered in his column in The Sun.

Fake falls.

Kanu's one is a fake fall, a plain fake fall. The refereeing committee also investigated Arsenal's appeal and some media opinions. After being identified by the senior management of the referee committee and the staff of the technical committee, everyone agreed that Kanu's ball was a fake fall.

As a result, the refereeing committee quickly upheld Jack's decision.

The referee committee found that Kanu was a fake-throw, and there was nothing wrong with Jack's decision.

However, Jack didn't think a yellow card was enough. There is no blow to fake falls at all. So Jack dissected in the newspaper why there were more and more fake falls.

"The cost of a fake fall is too low. Even if it is found by the referee, it is nothing more than a yellow card. And in English football, many referees don't even say anything about fake falls. But once you succeed in deceiving the referee, then the opponent may get a yellow card and can also get the benefit of a penalty. ”

"Some teams just won by faking falls. Compared to a real three-point, compared to a real victory, a little criticism is nothing at all. On the contrary, there is no real punishment for players who fake falls. Therefore, fake falls are becoming more and more rampant, and the cost of fake falls is too low, and no one cares. I think any fake fall, even if the referee on duty doesn't find it, should be punished after the fight. ”

Jack is on par with fake falls.

Among the current Premier League referees, the one with the most severe penalty for fake falls is Jack. In the game of Jack's enforcement, those who dared to fake a fall in the penalty area, or even those who dared to fake a fall near the penalty area, were all yellow cards, and there was no negotiation.

Jack's suggestion was very sincere. Jack's status on the referee committee is too low, and many times it is better to make a suggestion than to fart loudly. Therefore, it is better to propose it in the newspaper.

Jack hopes that the topic of fake falls will continue to be hyped up and brought to the attention of the FA and the referee committee. It can severely crack down on all kinds of fake falls.

But I didn't expect this topic to continue to be stirred up, but was stirred up by a report.

Daley, a football commentator for The Telegraph, wrote in the newspaper that "Referee Jack Lee, a Rich Guy - A Contemporary Robin Hood."

The newspapers came up with all sorts of data, all of which were games that Jack had officiated for. There are games like the League Cup and FA Cup that Jack has officiated in the lower leagues, and there are two games that Jack has officiated in the Premier League.

In the end, it was all bad luck for the strong team.

The game in which Jack became famous, that was the start of the Owen red card for Liverpool. Then looking at the Premier League game, Jack's first game was Leeds United against Everton.

The game was all kinds of "harsh" for Leeds United. Not only did he send off Ian Hart, but he also caused a huge storm after the game. Many of Leeds United's players were suspended.

And the same was true in the game that just ended.

Jack is tough on Arsenal. Not only did he blow Kanu fake, but he also gave Vieira a red card. Soon after, Vieira was suspended for three more games.

After analyzing it, he believes that Judge Jack Lee is a referee who takes care of weak teams during the game. is a referee who prefers to "rob the rich and help the poor".

Soon, many media commented on this.

And the moment the person in question, Jack, saw this newspaper, he couldn't help but give the "Daily Telegraph" the middle finger and shouted "I rely on your sister". Jack wasn't Robin Hood, and he didn't want to be one.

The people in this world who can break the rules are great people.

Because breaking the rules will change the lives of countless people. And if you want to break the rules, then you have to fight against countless people who uphold the rules. Most of the people in history who want to break the rules have died in the rules.

And in the end, those who can succeed are those who have left their names in history or those who have been infamous for thousands of years.

Jack didn't have the morality and perseverance to go down in history, nor did he have the courage to leave a legacy for thousands of years. Robin Hood, what is the end result?

Although it was only a novel, his final result was that he was bled to death.

Jack didn't want to be a vassal of the wealthy and become one of those notorious "royal referees of the wealthy". But Jack also doesn't want to be the enemy of the giants and become the face of the so-called civilian team.

That's why Jack was angry with The Telegraph.

But it seems that the English media are very happy with Jack's title. A lot of people are starting to say that Jack is Robin Hood, the Robin Hood of the refereeing world. It is completely to establish Jack as a referee who "robs the rich and helps the poor".

Jack was helpless.

Although Jack said in his column that he only wants to be a fair and fair referee. I don't care if the opponent is a big club or a relegation team. But the media simply ignored Jack's statement and insisted on pressing the title on Jack's head.

Is.

But Jack isn't the first referee to be given such a title. That's how Corina, the current No. 1 referee in European football, became famous. When Corina first became famous, the Italian media dubbed him "robbing the rich and helping the poor". Because at that time, Collina was in favor of small teams in several decisions.

In the Italian football atmosphere, the sudden appearance of a referee who favors small teams makes Italian football very new. Add a few other things and let the Italian media start touting Corina.

But on the whole, now evaluating Corina, everyone can find that the so-called "robbing the rich and helping the poor" is a joke. Jack doesn't want to be fixed by an image.

But from the current point of view, it seems that I can't get rid of this image in a short time.

A little depressed.

i1153