Update later, let's talk about your arguments.

I woke up at four o'clock. Then I'm going to my aunt's house for dinner tonight, and maybe playing cards or something. The update is late, and I dare not guarantee that there will be ..... There is a high probability that it will not be available today.

In addition, when I talked about Sakurai's current affairs, when I wrote it before, I thought about whether I should be more objective, but after thinking about it, Sakurai is a foreigner, and his views should be subjective and a bit one-sided. The author writes that he uses the pen (keyboard) in his hand to build a world, and there are all kinds of people in this world, with different thoughts and different views..... If you can do this step, you will be a qualified writer.

When I wrote that paragraph, I wrote it from the perspective of Sakurai's current politics (except for this paragraph, I didn't write about the Qing Dynasty before). Personally, I think that only in this way can we perfectly shape the distinctive characteristics of the characters and the conflict of the three views. Of course, I'm still far from that.

You see, Li Xianyu didn't think the Qing Dynasty was good, he always felt that it was the most tragic era in history.

In terms of the collision of ideas of the characters, I feel that I am doing okay. I don't have a face in my character, whether it's a villain or a decent person.

But it may be that the reader is too sensible, or my book has too poor sense of substitution, and you play at every turn, and if you see something that does not match your own point of view, it is immediately the author's problem. Said: Ah, author, you Manchu licking dog or something.....

You don't have a soul when you read books like this (manual funny).

And then let's talk about my point of view, to summarize the Qing Dynasty simply, it was a dynasty that was very strong in the early stage, weak in the middle period, and very tragic in the later period.

No dynasty in China has such a tragedy, there is no China after the cliff mountain, there is no China after the death of the Ming Dynasty, compared with the late Qing Dynasty, this is all pediatrics.

As for the territory, the Qing Dynasty was indeed the "largest" dynasty in China's previous dynasties, and the Tang Dynasty was not as big as him.

It's not what I say, it's what history says. Readers who say I have too many personal opinions to look at history for themselves.

I didn't include the Yuan Dynasty here, so I put double quotation marks on it. Because about the Yuan Dynasty, the controversy was fiercer than that of the Qing Dynasty. Some people say that the Yuan Dynasty is not China, and China is just one of the many little brothers it has fought. The fact that the Ming Dynasty simply expelled them back then is the best proof of this.

Therefore, the territory of the Ming Dynasty is not as large as that of the Qing Dynasty, and it is much worse. After the Qing Dynasty entered Beijing, it included its original territory and the territory of the Ming Dynasty (this is the official history, not private goods).

Some people also say that the Yuan Dynasty is Chinese, because if the Qing Dynasty is considered China, why is the Yuan Dynasty not considered China.

I think it's mainly because later the Mongols split up and the Manchus were assimilated (this is private, my personal opinion).

In fact, it's because of the skin at the end of the last chapter, and someone took it seriously......

So I'm afraid I won't update something today, you really think the book is over. It just so happened that everyone had a debate about the Qing Dynasty, so a single chapter was written on this topic...... Rest assured, it's not over yet.

Finally, Happy New Year.

Recommend the new book of the urban god Lao Shi: