I saw a lot of readers asking about the book friend group number, I only mentioned it once in the starting point writer's statement before, and now I say it again in a single chapter, and the QQ group number is 850785216.

And then this single chapter is not simply used to send group accounts, I want to use this single chapter to say something.

Now that this book has done well, there are quite a lot of people reading it, and the readership base is much larger than before, so there will be some problems.

Below, you can watch it as a pleasure.

On October 5th, a reader from the book city joined the book friend group and asked me some questions in a private chat, some about the book and some about me personally.

I answered everything about the book, I said some about my personal and what I could say, and I told this reader that there is no need to be so curious about my privacy, and it is better to go to the group to talk to everyone about the book, and do not talk to me privately.

Then I went to the group to take a look, and this reader was really chatting with the group friends.

In fact, at this point, except for the tone of the other party like a leader checking the post when chatting, and unnecessary curiosity about my personal situation, and innocuous questions such as "Some readers say that you are gay, what do you think", there is nothing particularly bad, and then I flipped through the group records and found that the first sentence of this reader in the group was "Is the author still alive?" ”

And then "Isn't it possible that the corpse has changed", "The obsession before dying is to finish the second book before leaving", "The author does not dare to come out at night and stay in the coffin silently", perhaps because he thinks it is humorous to talk like this?

But the book friends in the book friend group didn't think this was funny, and then, the reader commented on the book in the tone of a leader's speech, both good and bad, which I accept.

Later, he asked me when the book would be abandoned, wondering if the part-time job would be beyond his means, and when he would be a eunuch.

I'm speechless about this way of chatting, and I really want me to give up? Prior to this, the way this reader spoke had already made many members of the group feel uncomfortable.

I've omitted some topics that aren't easy to write about here, and I've only written the main points.

It is good to give an opinion, but only if it is done on the basis of what is already there. The following is an excerpt from the original words.

1. How does the author string together the two plots, and 2. What roles are they going to play? What is the emotional line of each other? These are the two main aspects to discern, and of course if he forcibly came and threw a stone into amnesia, then I didn't say it. The author won't be so pitiful."

The question is very good, I don't want to focus on this reader here, I just want to let you see the problem through these words - the question is for the book (very good), the process is made up by the reader's brain (okay), and the conclusion of the pit is for the author (confusing).

This is not an isolated case, and there have been many readers who have passed their guesses as the plot I have already written, and then come to a confusing conclusion.

The following is this reader's question about Yu Xing, the root of the problem is, "Yu Xing's combat power SSS with his bare hands, and his combat power A with a weapon, why do he have to take a weapon?" ”

A group of friends asked him, when did the author write that Yu Xing's bare hands are stronger than using weapons?

He used the example of Qu Zhiqing to prove it, and I also extracted the original words, and I added them in parentheses.

"Yu Xing is in the condition of a big difference of ranks, and he captures Qu with his bare hands (here refers to Yu Xing and Qu Zhiqing's small practice before leaving for Fuhua City), right, it should be very simple for Qu to fight in red, right?"

The group members said that his point of view was wrong, and his original words: "No, no, no, the opinion must be based on facts, and the facts have been clearly stated, and the reference is a song." ”

What he means is that Qu Xingqing can't beat Yu Xing with his bare hands + It's very simple for Qu Zhiqing to beat two red clothes = It's very simple for Yu Xing to fight two red clothes with his bare hands, so Yu Xing's combat power sss with bare hands, and the idea of taking weapons combat power A is contradictory.

I:??? Good guy, at first glance it can really bluff people.

But you don't have to look too closely to find out what does Yu Xing's strong fighting have to do with his weak weapons!

First of all, it's true that Yu Xing is stronger than Qu Zhi Qing (this is what I explicitly wrote).

The second point is that it is very simple, yes, it is very simple, the premise is to hold a sword, or use a sacrifice.

Third, when Yu Xing and Qu Zhiqing were practicing, it was pure fighting, and Qu Zhiqing did not hold a sword or use any sacrifices.

As a differentiation-level boss, her sacrificial reserves and sword are the source of her combat power.

Yu Xing's fighting ability is strong, where does it mean that when holding a weapon, it is weaker than hand-to-hand? Where did this conclusion come from?

When he fought with Yu Xing, Qu Zhiqing didn't hold a sword!

It's very simple logic, bare hands, Yu Xing's combat power is 5, Qu Rank Qing is 4, take weapons and sacrifices, Yu Xing's combat power is 8, Qu Rank Qing's combat power is 14 (these are not exact values, just an example), Qu Xing Qing can't beat Yu Xing with bare hands, which doesn't mean that Yu Xing's combat effectiveness with weapons is lower than that with bare hands.

I happened to open the group at the time, and I said to the reader, "This conclusion is flawed. ”

Him: "Did you see me talking?" ”

Group friend: "?? ”

Me: "??? Didn't you type so many words yourself, but by ghosts? ”

Him: "Did you see what I typed?" ”

Well, he probably did find him humorous.

In short, I think he is really thinking about this problem, and I have explained to him many times, why Qu Zhiqing can't beat Yu Xing with his bare hands does not mean that Yu Xing is weaker with weapons than with his bare hands.

He didn't listen, and I gave him another example that was easier to understand.

"In the game, a shooter is very strong when he has a gun, and he loses his gun and fights with others in close quarters, and if he loses, it doesn't mean that he is not a strong shooter. Similarly, the one who defeated the shooter without a gun, what if it was a mage? It doesn't mean that he is weaker at picking up a staff than in hand-to-hand combat. ”

I think I've been patient, and the group is listening, and they're discussing, and then this reader says:

"Are you sure the game is logical?"

"It comes from life, it can be higher, but it can't be separated from your perceptual experience."

I was really sad that this reader used his own logic to convince himself, to make a very simple question so complicated, and then to use this logic to ask me.

Isn't what I'm writing about supernatural? Are ghosts logical? Is the sacrifice logical? Can I have personal experience with relationships???

……

Again, it's okay to give advice, but, please don't overturn my settings, use another set of settings in your mind to ask me how to write, then simply give the keyboard out, whoever wants to set who will write the article.

The reader reads the article and the author writes the article, I think at least the relationship between the two is equal.

It's my job to write essays, I'm working, I don't need to be like a dog, whoever says a word I have to change the setting, whoever scolds me has to apologize.

A manager in the group really couldn't stand it, and kicked the person, and the follow-up was cliché - the person was added back to the group, saying that the group members were all elementary school students, saying that I had a very bad attitude, and then said that he didn't stay and kicked him.

I wondered, why are you coming back if you don't stay? Just to scold a few words my other readers are elementary school students? I'm a welcome, if you can't talk well, I still have to grovel to you to have a good attitude?

The management was as he wished, and he kicked it again, and the book friend told me that today's incident was taken in a screenshot to keep evidence, including all the inappropriate remarks of the other party at the beginning, so as not to make things in the comment area.

I'm writing at night.,Open the background comments and take a look.,Okay.,Sure enough, I'm doing something.,Swiped a few one-star bad reviews in the book city.,And continue to say that my readers.,I want everyone else to bully him.。

In fact, I started from the main station, and the bad reviews in the book city had no effect on me, but I just couldn't see this kind of behavior that I felt that others were wrong and blamed me for the behavior of other readers, so I wrote such a long single chapter in one breath.

Good guys, it's worth the word count of my usual chapter.

This incident has little to do with other readers who are reading a book, and if you see this, you should eat a melon.

I didn't delete his one-star comment, and now I'm speaking manically, and the screenshot has been posted, so you are welcome to see it.