Although the laws and regulations have always been monogamous, and the two-child policy was later liberalized, this trend of thought has always existed, and a certain news does not mean that the method of someone bribing someone is very trendy, and the use of surrogacy allows the bribed person to have several more children born.

The argument is that so-and-so's genes are very good, and one or two are not enough, which is simply to delay the spread of good genes, and it is good to have a few more children. With the birth of more children, the good genes can spread more widely, anyway, this bribery method is still super weird, and I don't know what the bribe-taker's brain thinks. But it is undeniable that this method was successful, and the bribe-taker had two more children.

This way is really a little speechless, bribe-takers and bribe-takers are like kings * looking at mung beans - looking at the right eyes, which shows that there is still a certain market for this idea, and there will be such a strange way of bribery.

Even a well-known writer doesn't mean this: if some people have good genes, they should have more children, which is conducive to genetic optimization, so how to determine that the genes are good? Just because they are powerful are genetically good? But there is no shortage of new upstarts in this world.

In fact, if you check the ancestors of everyone in Kyushu, maybe everyone will have a noble ancestor - there are more princes and nobles, so this so-called argument that if the genes are good, there should be a few more people is really boring, and why does it feel that this argument has an inexplicable sense of familiarity?

Ling Xiao is reminded of the propaganda of a certain Third Reich: the theory of racial superiority, which is said to be divided into eight classes (1) of the world, the first four of which are all Caucasians: Aryan, Germanic, Pinning, and Aryan descendants of India, while the yellow race is ranked fifth. And the German three started World War II with two alliances in this tone, and eventually became a defeated country.

So Ling Xiao really wants to ask: Is that so-called argument really scientifically based? Is this approach really good for genetic optimization? In fact, you will find that many parents of geniuses are not geniuses?

Even the descendants of some geniuses are not all powerful, and there are very good descendants who have inherited the skills of their ancestors, but more of them are unknown to everyone, and they are not better than ordinary children.

The funniest thing is that the writer put the so-called stallion argument in order to prevent being said to belong to that kind of feudal style, and said that this standard should be both male and female, which means that men can find more women, and women can naturally find more men.

Listening to what he said, this excuse for genetic optimization is simply the best excuse for the prodigal son to go out and surf, stepping on a few more boats is not a man's heart, this is to optimize genes, righteousness! Tall! Wonderful! In these years, even the excuse for cheating is so fresh and refined, and it is still hanging in a high place.

Actually, isn't it just that you want to engage in polygamy? What to say about genetic modification! It's like selling dog meat on the head of a sheep. And the real genetic improvement should be like in science fiction, where men and women marry not for love, but for the so-called matching of genes.

Of course, Ling Xiao doesn't advocate this so-called optimization of genes, but she feels extremely cold when she imagines it, and she has always been taught that marriage emphasizes love, not gene matching, and it is possible that men and women who are not very suitable after the combination of two genes will be shot by Cupid's arrow. So can we be together? Or was it simply dismantled?

Ling Xiao will feel the chill and hope that society will not go that far, after all, who wants to admit that their genes belong to inferior genes? No! Most people are not willing to admit that they are inferior even if they know that there are some problems, so will they have to test their genes as soon as they are born? Set a box at birth, as for the inferior genes that don't need to be passed on at all, probably all people are afraid that they will be angry when they hear this possibility.

In addition, the so-called inferior genes are inferior now, but it does not mean that they will be inferior in the future, and it is impossible to determine the superior and inferior. For example, genetic problems such as diabetes and high blood pressure, it is said that these diseases were the reason why the ancients were able to survive in ancient times, so are these genes superior or inferior?

In the early years, when aluminum first appeared, the charming metallic luster, or very light characteristics, made aluminum popular with many people, because after the discovery, the number was very small, and even a crown was specially made.

But later, after aluminum was found to be easy to manufacture, its value fell off a cliff and became the most common metal, cheap is not good, and sometimes I really don't know how to distinguish between superior and inferior.

But what Ling Xiao can be sure of is that the argument that he has to optimize genes is terrible, if the society really develops to this point, isn't it that the child who wants to be born is not allowed to be born, and he has to give birth to a child who meets the standard, then will there be more Liang Shanbo and Zhu Yingtai?

In addition, she also wanted to say, please don't bring female compatriots, which reminded Ling Xiao of the high argument of a certain professor she had heard, saying that because men were born with more women than women in the same period, it would inevitably cause some men to be unable to get married, which would make them unstable.

In order to reduce the number of singles, the marriage market should be liberalized and one woman should be encouraged to marry N men. Ling Xiao had a creepy feeling after seeing this statement, and his first thought after seeing it was to give this guy who made a strange argument a few slaps in the face.

What's going on? If so, would it raise the status of women? Ling Xiao felt that he couldn't, because a person's status should depend on how much money he can get, and with an economic foundation, it is possible to improve his social status. It is said in the books that the economic base determines the superstructure.

Just imagining it, Ling Xiao understood that the only woman among the women and N men was generally in a low-status situation, and now how many women with knowledge and ideals were willing to become co-wives? For example, would the female heiress of a large consortium be willing to become co-wives?

As long as you use your brain, you will know that this is impossible, the co-wife is more in the position of an inflatable WA baby, which is simply to relieve the male ** hope, and the biggest possibility is that she has become a fertility machine, constantly giving birth to life.

Ling Xiao asked herself, she would never let herself fall to this point, what is a woman and a man? She didn't have the consciousness to sacrifice herself to save the male single, and goosebumps rose all over her body at the thought of this possibility, and she felt creepy. This is obviously the status of women being lowered again, and those who want to support this idea get out!

So how do you look at Ling Xiao, I feel that the argument that advocates female compatriots marrying N husbands is nonsense, the reality is not, the reality is more cruel than many times, and it can't be arbitrarily broken nonsense.

Maybe some people don't agree with Ling Xiao's idea, and think that the life of a co-wife is like some descriptions, several men love the female pig's feet miserably, and no one can do without her (purely to release P, whoever leaves can live), accept the situation of the co-wife, those men have assigned their own situations one by one, some people are specially accompanying the heroine, some are mainly responsible for earning money, and it seems that the heroine is living happily.

But Ling Xiao felt that this was too false, would individuals ask for something in return after giving their emotions? It should be, and a woman bears the love of N men alone, how to reciprocate?

Love is not like a big pie, it can be distributed arbitrarily, and it can also ensure that everyone gets the same weight, love is elusive, and it should not be measured, so women think that they give the same love, but N men are not, and people's hearts are biased, and it is a problem for a long time.

There are also people who naturally think about themselves first, for example, if a female pig's foot is pregnant and gives birth to one of the men's children, will the other men ask the woman to have another child of their own?

Yes! I believe that most men have this idea, this is also nature, once it can't be achieved, will it make waves? Maybe men don't care about it, but in reality it won't be like this, N men will ask their wives to have a child of their own, and no one can have several children and none of them. So this means that women are reduced to reproductive machines.

After years of education, there are several female compatriots who are willing to endure all kinds of discomfort and discomfort during pregnancy again and again, and endure pain again and again, unable to go to work, without salary, relying on the mercy of their husbands for everything, and waiting for their husbands to give them whatever they want to eat.

Just imagining it makes many women dispel the so-called fantasy of a woman and a man, and after marriage, they will most likely feel that it is important to have a child of their own. So when a woman marries a man, the men are bound to let the women give birth one by one. And as a female compatriot who is sick and wants endless childbearing, this kind of saying that a woman marries an N man can rest.

In addition, even in modern society, giving birth to children again and again will greatly damage women's health, and some people die in childbirth, and after giving birth to children, they will be more tired, and they will have to breastfeed their children, which will inevitably affect the jobs that women are looking for again, and finally have to give up their jobs completely.

If you don't give up, who wants to work with a woman who often asks for leave to prepare for childbirth, there will be a lot of taboos during pregnancy, and many things as a partner can only be done by themselves, and the credit should be half shared, I believe no one will want to.

As a result, there will be fewer opportunities for female compatriots to go out to work, and it may even lead to some companies directly rejecting women's entry, and it is strongly recommended that women go directly to get married, have children and raise children, which will inevitably cause the anger of other female compatriots who want to work, leading to the split of the female camp. Once this kind of woman and N men appear to ask for help, will the women in the other camps pretend not to see it at all? Think they're all self-inflicted?

If she can't go to work in the company, is it possible for that female compatriot to create her own career? Unlikely! Because the responsibility she shoulders is too heavy, giving birth to a child is not the end, but just the beginning.

As a mother who has to clean up the house and cook for the family, it seems that the housework is not technical, but the housework has that endless quality, and it may even be very tiring to do it, but there is no feeling of great progress, as if nothing has been done.

For example, after giving birth to a child, it is impossible to completely throw it aside, grow up without caring about anything, this is an impossible thing, you have to give your children food and drink, you have to let them have a place to sleep, and you have to train them to grow up.

If you don't have time to take care of your children, in fact, it's equal to not having children, it's better not to give birth, many children die young, and there is a little affection that needs to be cultivated with each other, even between the closest parents and children, it is also necessary to cultivate feelings, otherwise the child will definitely have no feelings with his parents in the future when he grows up.

Of course, as soon as the arguments put forward by a certain expert came out, there were many people who thought the same as Ling Xiao, many of the female compatriots were opposed, and some of them vomited fragrant mouths, and many others greeted that person's family.

Ling Xiao would not greet his female family members, because they were them, and it was impossible for him to make him say such things, why did he say what he said, and the consequences would need to be borne by his family? In her view, whoever does the consequences should be held responsible.

I believe that not only female compatriots are unwilling to think about this idea, but also many male compatriots will not agree, this is because they look far away, in Ling Xiao's opinion, the so-called one woman N man is a bit anti-human, if you look at it by changing genders, it is a man and N women.

Ling Xiao imagined for a moment, there was a woman who was pregnant and gave birth to her own child, but she didn't let other women give birth, and kept saying that I gave birth to your child, see how many foolish women are willing? Can it be the same?

Of course it's different, blood involvement will make the mother and child be on the same position from the beginning (except for a few women, this kind of person doesn't even have their own children and is not on the same position as themselves, and they don't know how to do it)

And other women, even if they are good to that child, are still a little estranged. If you also do something wrong, and your mother scolds the child and tells the child that she has done something wrong, then the mother and the child will soon forgive each other.

But if it's not your own child, it's someone else's child, and that child has done something wrong, then if it is replaced by a so-called aunt to beat and scold, that child will definitely remember it in a small book: On a certain day, a certain month, I was beaten and scolded for ** reasons, and I wrote it down.

It's okay once or twice, but after a long time, you will gradually forget some small problems, but if it keeps going like this, even if someone has a good intention, but there is a problem with the means, or there is no problem with the means, but the implementation is too anxious, it will cause big problems, maybe it will be the relationship between enemies.

It can be seen that it is human nature to want a child of one's own, not one's own child, who is willing to saddle up and follow behind? When a cow is a horse and does things for children, but because of nagging and rebellion and other reasons, they are rejected by their children, and they have biological children, not to mention the so-called mother-child relationship that is not related by blood.

Most people are more concerned about blood relatives, between adoptive mothers and mothers, most people will favor their own mothers, not to mention the kind of women who rob their fathers of favor with their mothers, and they should die!

n.