Gu Ruxi said: "What do you mean by this? ”

Qiao Yilong said: "Then let's discuss problems with each other, the students of the Department of Philosophy are very serious about our studies. ”

When you are thinking, every time you talk about philosophical issues, I always want you to constantly sort out your achievements.

Gu Ruxi said: "But then you found out that this incident will move many people and anger you, why?" ”

Qiao Yilong said: "For example, what you just said smelled." ”

Do you mean your tea or mine, I'll hit you, you know what you're talking about, do you want to make sure of this method of discussion again?

It's going to make people think that you treat me as white.,You're the si.,That's the si.

Or alas.

Because he didn't understand what you said, he wanted to smash his phone angrily, right?

Gu Ruxi said: "Then why do we want to say this? ”

It's because our kind of philosophical training is still the so-called Anglo-American analytic philosophy training, and we like to talk about this thing the most, and we have to figure it out word by word.

And then where is his grammatical problem, where is his something.

Qiao Yilong said: "Because we believe that there is only help, we have all these things clearly. ”

Qiao Yilong said: "It is possible for us to have a meaningful discussion, otherwise everything is meaningless." ”

So why do you make people angry so easily?

Gu Ruxi said: "This is because you have encountered what is going on in our daily life, and our daily life is actually a large number of overseas games. ”

We say that everything comes out in our daily life, and the image behind it is actually ambiguous and complex, but if you read analytic philosophy, you always want to determine everything.

This may be ok in philosophical discussions.

In daily life, it is actually against the inertia of our daily human communication, and human beings are not such human beings.

Qiao Yilong said: "Our daily communication is full of strangeness, so why do we think that business festivals are the norm, but it is not called perverted." ”

Understanding is rare, and non-explanation is inevitable.

For example, in the 80s of the last century, there was a very big academic discussion, and there were many literary theorists and people who did cultural studies.

For example, some famous scholars such as Gu's scholars, like semiotic scholars, like Abe's dogs, have published entire books one by one, and the misreadings and misunderstandings of his educational thinking are all talking about these issues.

It's not that it's a

d sta

da

d?

Uh, that's a misunderstanding, but miss

eadi

g won't read it, just don't read it.

Everyone will feel that to some extent the misreading or misunderstanding is actually a normal human fairness phenomenon.

And it is necessary, and I have great news for you when it comes to this.

Do you know that it is not often said that this artificial intelligence will achieve a lot of work?

Qiao Yilong said: "He told me, he said that he finally understood what it is to say that artificial intelligence has developed to the highest level? ”

He said that this will be the end of the technology of artificial intelligence, that is, if one day he can chat like us, this technology will be in middle school.

He said that because we talk to each other, there are a lot of faint messages, for example, if I tell you that I love you, I will bring this tea next time.

Qiao Yilong said: "Actually, I have also been there a lot, saying that this tea is delicious, and then you also know what kind of tea I am talking about or when." ”

The next time we meet again, etc., it means that people will also understand that my mood is joy or happiness or a lot of information has been hidden.

Gu Ruxi said: "We can have this chat, and our big data can't read this. ”

I want to say that your jobs will be saved, and you will be the last to be replaced, and this is actually artificial intelligence.

Therefore, there is a lot of emphasis on the name, and this kind of discussion of Siroji and Western logic is that there are too many such uncertain things involved.

For example, I have several ways to say the sentence just now, you can bring me this tea next time.

You can bring me this tea next time, the meaning of accenting you is completely different.

The semantic words are all permuted continuously, and they can be the same.

But because of the different tone, the meaning of the accent will change depending on it, and there is a saying in it, not even to say, bring tea next time.

Qiao Yilong said: "Because when I say bring tea, it is equivalent to saying that kindness should be understood, unless he deliberately misunderstands."

So, I don't think it's less pessimistic, what communication between people is not necessarily a misunderstanding, it's normal, but what we have to choose to believe, so this goes back to Xiao Junjun and said.

What did you say that friend, when AI is able to chat, it's the best, it's over.

Why is this?

What can I follow in my heart is how to learn that judgment?

For example, I heard it wrong this time, I didn't know it last time, of course artificial intelligence is self-learning, right?

Another thing that sounds more difficult is to trust the informant, I want to trust you, and when I say that I am moved by the smell of wealth, you can probably judge and know what you mean based on our previous interactions.

Because there is learning and our interaction probably knows what to do next, so we judge that learning and trust are built on the foundation.

So, that trust is very important, and without trust, everything is gone.

For example, I often meet young people who think they don't understand anything and don't do anything.

Later, I also became a teacher, and the authorities have a very important matter, let me tell you, alas, the last time it was too noisy.

And then I'm going to make sure this is going to happen?

Tell me how you're going to do it, yes, yes, yes, this is actually very offensive.

Gu Ruxi said: "I think that sometimes I talk to my wife about a very important matter, the family's financial management, or something.

Today I'm going to repeat you to you, tell me if that's it, and we're not very annoying, but you know what?

The boss will like it, and the employee has a word called closed-loop is love, and immediately the two of them showed this difference.

That is to say, you will find that if an employee's boss tells him something, there will be an echo, that is, what should I do in the end?

If you throw a rock, you can hear the sound, but you will find that there is an employee, you tell him that he may do it.

You don't know when he did it, he may have done it at the meeting, he may not be able to do it, and he will be confused.

You say this is what kind of staff you would like to use, but when you say this, I think there are some jokes, about the British in the past, there was a set of British civil service management system.

The way they speak inside is actually a set of jargon.

But this kind of jargon is often how subordinates should talk to their bosses, for example, your boss is facing a group of old civil servants who have been working for decades, old civil servants.

For example, when he hears the boss speak, he wants to respond to the reaction, like you just said that the echo is full of many species space.

Qiao Yilong said: "I'll give you an example, let's say I'm a director of education, I said ah the middle school will be extended for one year, and then what about the employees below,

Probably your response, what do these old companies do with their standard meetings?

It's very creative to hear how this boss and this person can use this imagination, if this is a ridiculous stage, next year's university entrance examination will be abolished.

He said it's ve

Y Bold: Well, that's all jargon.

Actually, you can understand what this means if you are in this system, but you see this is a misreading.

It's not the same literal meaning that he really wants to express, so, for example, why I just said why we talk to each other a lot of hidden information in the same background.

In fact, your directivity includes the IQ you just said, as if or to say that the surface meaning is indeed oops, this tea is so delicious, in fact, I don't have this, and I don't mean that.

But the AI can't understand the direction of what you're saying, and he didn't say it when I asked the AI expert last time.

Now, for example, if you watch that American drama, it's that Westworld, and he says that if you go to this bar, he's actually a robot.

The host will roughly judge who you are, how old the man and woman are, and he will come and hand you a glass.

He said that this has developed to the point that if we humans want to control it, that is to say, this logic that he draws.

He said that this is already about them, and the development of this field has reached a bottleneck, and it is impossible to break through again.

Because why do you want to give up control, we worry about it all the time.

Oh, one day the AI will come and say it's going to kill us, it's going to kill us, it's going to make us they have intelligence, they have emotions, they don't have to wait there to get to this point.

He said that if you want to do such an action, give you tea and talk to you, people already have to write a lot of programs behind their backs, and it is impossible for him to learn by himself.

You have to go out and control, because our artificial intelligence is called big data, right, you have a lot of data that you have to learn, and what is our human brain?

Our human brain is a small piece of data, that is, I know a little bit of information, and I saw this pot and this apricot today is yellow.

The next time I see a more popular one, I also know that it is fresh, that is, you are a human brain learning is a small data, the logic of the human brain and artificial are really different, so in the end he told me why is it called artificial intelligence?

It's still in the artificial stage, yes, you hit a round ball like my buddy a while ago, like that one, I know it's what it means to talk to him.

Then every time you call him, because every time you call him, there is no sign of this, and he actually said later that he was like a radio.

What's the difference but let's come to a paragraph of the Sui and Tang Romances, saying that Luo Cheng is not coming out, and then he is a girl, and then say What is your name, do you know what my name is, and then say Do you like me?

Qiao Yilong said: "I don't understand what you're talking about, I don't understand what you're talking about, Qiao Yilong just said this, I feel that it's still very low-level and naïve."

But what you said really makes us see the difference between artificial intelligence and people, that is, you see artificial intelligence, it is a lot of this logical model, this kind of city?

Even if we imagine that in the future he will be truly controlled, and he will be able to have some kind of autonomous directional dialogue with you.

Uh, that means, alas.

So what do you say is the difference between the sensory impression of a human and the sensory impression of a machine?

You just talked about this project, we're going to have this color, but in fact, none of them are this color.

So you see that, so sometimes of course I'm not a Buddhist.

It's just that, I think you have such a sentence in this Huayan Sutra, I think sometimes it makes me feel like a coincidence.

That is to say, coincidence or how to make poetry give color, he said this heart.

Gu Ruxi said: "Just like we said, this brain, he can follow the class, what color is this, what is this, but in fact, this color is essentially an energy radiation from how many wavelengths to how many wavelengths."

This energy radiation, your eyeballs are like the lens of a camera, and you can't be immune to this.

But the most important thing is what you are in your brain.

So in a way, you're really your red, orange, yellow, green, blue, purple world, it's happening inside your brain, it's complicated, it's not just in your brain that it's reproducing America.

He still has emotions right, when you are happy, you are the tea that is happy, so this emotion has too much impact, just a big paragraph that Xiao Junjun just said.

In fact, I am still supporting what I said, and this element is more important to judge learning, for example, we are now starting to say trust me trust you.

Qiao Yilong said: "This kind of communication of ours, or you haven't told me now, like I don't know artificial intelligence, how to deal with this problem, I understand things with artificial intelligence, I can lie." ”

Of course, you can also learn to come and see me, I lie,

The problem is that sometimes I don't know what I speak, because we humans have memories that have changed with our emotions many times in the past.

When I'm happy, I remember certain things, the same thing when I'm not happy, let's say we're three years.

What do I remember about it, did anything happen, and why?

And the perspective of things is completely different, I think your version because loneliness is beautiful for us, and why is it attractive for machines.

Maybe I'll give you an example.

For example, this kind of thing often happens to many men and women, and the old husband and wife and wife say that we were in the office at the beginning.

We were magazine reporters, and the first time we met, I wanted to tell my girlfriend, and it was love at first sight, and I said that I was satisfied with my heart.

This is obviously like this in my memory, when I was young, of course, he denied it, almost slashed me with a knife, and then I didn't see you, I thought you were very annoying.

Alas, it was you who chased me and chased me relentlessly, and waited for him, and my wife also believed that it was true.

But which class was it at that time?

This self-understanding of memory information will change, so if people are really useful, these are all factors, so Gen Zitan said Don't you see Wittgenstein has a famous saying?

For the unspeakable, we can only remain silent, this is what you say, uh, you say this misreading this has a lot to do with language.