An An, who had been interrupted for three days without any explanation, rolled back to update again.

During this period, a reader left a message in the comment area, which probably means that he likes such a majestic work very much, and adds bookshelves to fatten it, but this comment that I have replied to magically disappeared the next day...... I don't know if this reader saw that I broke off the update for no reason, so he came to delete the comment, or after reading a few chapters, he found that it was not majestic, so he came to delete the comment, or the system ate it by accident...... In short, the message disappeared, but fortunately, the message flew away and the author flew back.

During this period, An An is pleased that readers have been silently voting and subscribing for this book.

During this period, An An encountered a very frustrating setback, and began to doubt life, ideals, and herself, crying for three days, and languishing. I don't have to ask about specific things, in short, what I think is right is wrong in the eyes of others; What I think is worth is vain in the eyes of others; The dreams I hold onto, and the way I hold on to them, are in vain in the eyes of others.

During this period, family members were worried and comforted, friends greeted and discussed, but An An himself was talking about big truths, and his heart was still digging into the horns. As a result, everyone was delayed for a lot of time, and what they had to do was not completed, "The Nations" was left behind, and their health, life, and work were neglected.

In the end, it's just one question after another that can't be solved.

However, due to personality, temperament, and the occupational diseases that have been "asking questions and giving explanations" over the years, it is easy to sink into the problems that cannot be solved. As a result, for three days, not a word was written. And three days ago, I also wrote those chapters of sweet drama hard. How sweet the characters are, how painful the author is.

It's a pity that An An still has work to do, stories to write, food to eat, money to make, a big world to see, and a lot of books to read. Three days is already the most time I can give this sentimentality of self-doubt.

Now I feel calmer, my eyes are swollen, and I feel hungry...... Looking back, some people may say that these three days of tossing are really a waste of energy and time, but I think that leaving three days for sentimentality is rare and worthwhile.

If you cry, you will cry happily.

If you want to, you can think thoroughly.

Then, it's time to write, it's time to eat, it's time to drink.

With the growth of people, with the acceleration of the pace of life, such three days are very naïve and luxurious.

But I think it's necessary to leave three days for depression, three days for tears, three days for sentimentality, and three days for reflection and reflection. Because that's what you're going to do for your emotions for three days, three days for yourself.

Just ask modern people, how much time do you dare to leave for yourself to digest emotions and indulge in philosophical thoughts in your life? Is the time to cry when you want to cry only when you are a child? So is this kind of "naivety" also precious?

It is said that we must maintain "childlike innocence" in order to have rich imagination and creativity, what is childlike innocence? Curiosity is childlike innocence, and true temperament is also childlike innocence. If you want to cry, you have to dig three feet into the ground and find time to cry, this is childlike innocence.

If an author does not have a childlike innocence, how can he talk about imagination? This kind of childlike innocence, although it is not conducive to the commercialization and commodification of the world in front of us, is beneficial to the author and the work.

Thinking is like a labyrinth, and a person who likes to think will often enter the maze in his brain. The labyrinth is not a two-point line, but full of dead ends. People who often walk the brain maze must often walk into a dead end of thinking, and then entangle with themselves.

However, if it is a maze, there will be entrances and exits. There are too many dead ends, and sooner or later you can get out. After all, childlike innocence is not a mental illness.

The exit of this labyrinth is to forgive others and oneself, and the sea and the sky are wide.

……

When it comes to forgiveness and tolerance, that's the central idea, or core values, of the story of "Nations." Therefore, the female protagonist's name is "Forgiveness", and the male protagonist's name is "Rong". When you see the back, you will definitely realize it slowly.

A reader asked me before, what is the central idea of your book? Is it the feelings of family and country? Is it worried about the country and the people? Is it the love of children in the hatred of the family and the country?

There are also feelings for the family and the country, worries about the country and the people, and love for children, but the focus is on "worrying about people". As for hatred, there are so many that you can't pull it out, but if you think about it, why pluck it? Hatred is also used to set off the good.

The feelings of family and country originate from the nostalgia after many years of being away from home. Worrying about the country and the people stems from self-reflection after the culture shock. The love of children stems from the instinct of being human.

The so-called "worrying about people" is a concern about the concepts that many people advocate in today's society.

In an era when "revenge, scum, and slap in the face" are prevalent, preaching forgiveness and tolerance may be met with white eyes, or may be said to be withdrawn and cowardly...... However, it also depends on what kind of hatred, what scum, and what kind of face.

For example, "Langya Bang", which is labeled as an Avengers story, is actually not accurate. It is a story of "snow injustice", in order to get back innocence, find yourself, and create clarity. Revenge, scumbag, and slapping in the face are just easy to do, and they are not the theme at all.

As for "The Nations", this is not a story of shame and innocence, nor is there revenge, abuse and slap in the face, because in this book - there are too many hatreds and cannot be finished; The scum is too fine to be abused; The face is too handsome, and I can't bear to hit.

Then some people will ask, you say forgiveness and tolerance, but there are too many hatreds, and if you can't get back, you won't be able to do it again? The scum is too fine, and if you can't abuse it, you don't care? The face is too handsome, and you won't hit when you make mistakes? Isn't this cowardly retreat? Isn't this what the three views are wrong?

Haha, first of all, the hatred in this book, some of the hatred, is indeed the revenge of the avengers themselves, but there are still some hatreds, and before the avengers can do it, the hatred has been avenged in some other way. At this time, the avenger has nothing to do and has nowhere to vent, so he can only choose to forgive others and himself, and let go of grievances. What's more, there is some revenge, and the avenger can't bear to revenge, because if he gets revenge, he won't be happier. Compared with the praise of the world, the Avenger cares more about his own heart. Why can't man break free from the shackles of the world's mouth? Is the world always right? Is the world in the eyes of the world, or in one's own heart?

Secondly, scum, whether it is scum or not, really have to be seen from different angles, and even at different points in time. If you want to abuse but can't abuse, let's tolerate it first. The sea is inclusive, and there is tolerance. The gentleman abuses the scum, and it's not too late to get down. When you get to the next volume, maybe the peak turns around, and you find that you are not scum, then you are not afraid of deep dimples with a smile.

In the end, the face is too handsome, whether to fight or not? I'll go, so handsome, I owe a beating when I look at it! I'm going, it's wrong to be handsome? I'll go, it's not wrong to be handsome, it's your fault to be handsome everywhere! I'll go, don't hit me, I'll fight myself (just master the good strength)! I'll go, this guy is crazy, hit himself himself, I'm too lazy to beat a madman!

Ahem, the above dialogue is the rough artistic conception of "slapping the face" in this book. That's right, just beat yourself. Look at the problem from a different angle, look at the problem at a different point in time, sometimes, you need to dare to admit - although your face is handsome, your face is the one that should be hit the most! Therefore, the "slapping oneself in the face" here is actually "knowing the way back", "three provinces and my body", and daring to face one's own mistakes and bear one's own mistakes.

If you want to "worry about others", please first "discipline yourself".

What is more powerful than revenge by force is that not a single soldier is moved, and the canopy will be wiped out.

What is more powerful than revenge is to make others realize their mistakes and then ask for your forgiveness and forgiveness. Then, forgive what can be forgiven, forgive others, and forgive yourself. What cannot be forgiven, can it be atonemented and atoned for? Atonement can also be regarded as an environmental protection measure to save energy and reduce emissions, and waste is reused. Can't make amend, can't atone? Then let him cut himself.

What is more powerful than forgiveness and forgiveness is tolerance, the ability to think from different angles, so as to rationally eliminate hatred, understand the practices of others, turn enemies into friends, discuss big plans, and make money together, so why bother doing it?

……

Okay, tomorrow after tomorrow, how many tomorrows? Today's update.