Seeing the recent chapter saying that "open source data" will lead to the proliferation of missile technology, the more I write it, the more it is ridiculous, and the more unrealistic it becomes.

In fact, it's because of reality.

Recently, the real SpaceX company has open-sourced the SpaceX-API, and anyone can go up to check it, of course, it has not yet reached the open source strength of the protagonist in it, so it makes sense to write.

From SpaceX-API to Tesla's patent disclosure, to Boston Dynamics' robot dog open source, these seem to show that open source is the trend of the future, at least it is a symptom.

The reason for this phenomenon may be a market problem, open source can make the plate bigger, or it may be a problem of the enterprise itself, open source can save development costs, and there may be other factors (the author's level is not enough, I can only think of this).

As for leading to the diffusion of technology, this is the result that "open source" wants most, and it is also the result that the protagonist wants, otherwise what source to open?

It seems that anyone can make this thing in the chapter.

The answer is that no one can make it.

The technology of the atomic bomb B station has popular science, but there are only a few hooligans who can make it, and as long as the machine starts to purify uranium, the satellites in space can detect it, and "Yilang" has already performed it himself, so you can only build it with the acquiescence of a few hooligans, or in the case of a game.

Then if you zoom in on the pattern and look at it again, you will find that even if it is open source, in fact, it is a limited number of companies and citizens of a few large countries can play, and others who want to play must first go to the dock to worship before they dare to play, because he has to consider the risk of being played by hooligans in the middle of the game, which is also part of the game.

The game content at this level is not written directly, and it can't pass the review, so everyone can understand it.

Speaking of technical issues, rocket technology is open-sourced in the plot, but the basic materials and processes are not disclosed, which is similar to knowing the principle of how to build an atomic bomb but it is more difficult to build than to ascend to the sky.

Knowing how to build and not making it are two different things, so if you know how to build it, you can build it first and then follow the protagonist or work in a powerful large group, which is to achieve the purpose of talent training.

Finally, combined with the plot, the protagonist is now in the stage of technological catch-up, and the technology he has mastered is not exclusive, and competitors have it, and open source these technologies are actually adding chaos to the opponent, disrupting the rules of the game, muddying the water, lowering the threshold as a whole, and finally using his own unique skills to defeat the opponent in his absolute field.

As for some readers who say that technology diffusion is not good for everyone, it will cause chaos in the world, and the more you write, the more you talk about it, and the more you write, the less realistic it is.

Since you are so obsessed with reality, I would like to ask: In today's world, isn't the world chaotic enough? Isn't that? It's not all that I'm not doing well, don't think about it, I can be bad, that's no problem, as long as you're worse than me, I'm still the best one, that's the reality.

If "reality for the sake of referring to the standards of reality" is a bit deviated from the starting point and real focus of science fiction, the so-called "not in line with reality" is not the core problem at all, and the main and secondary issues must be clarified.

Science fiction science fiction is not science fantasy about future trends, the author does not dare to say how scientific the content he writes is, whether it can be in line with science (I also made a common sense mistake before, because of the geostrophic deflection force, the equatorial line is not typhoon, some readers pointed out, it has been revised), but it is obviously a personal judgment of the future trend and then expressed in the plot of the story.

For example, the open source of recyclable rocket technology, maybe SpaceX will really open source a lot in the future, or maybe not.

Another example is the cliché "space ladder", which is not easy to say in the future, because you can neither prove nor falsify things in the future, and there are too many mutagenic factors, so there are all kinds of fantasies, which are one of the judgments on the future direction, and what the final answer is, only the people of the future know, but this does not prevent us from providing multiple choice questions for the future.

If the eyes are all "reality" and there is no room for others, you will miss the point by putting the secondary issues at the main level. To put it bluntly, perhaps because of this, there is a relative lack of creativity on our side, which is why it is difficult to appear as a science madman like Elon Musk.

Sometimes, you have to dare to think about whether it can be achieved is another question.

For example, Xiao Yuyu was thinking, maybe a local tyrant would give us a silver reward? It's always okay to think about it.

(End of chapter)