Tears in my eyes......

Zhang Zhongjing's status in traditional Chinese medicine is immeasurable, and he is the first person in the true medical Tao, even after the popularity of the school of warm diseases, he is still respected as a medical saint.

The status of Hua Tuo has never been denied in the book, but it should be clearly distinguished between Hua Tuo in "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" and Zhang Zhongjing in traditional Chinese medicine.

Don't say that Hua Tuo's status is higher than Zhang Zhongjing's, this kind of thing is to hack me and blacken myself and let others see jokes, okay?

My readers can't be so cute.

It's not who is famous in the non-professional field, who is good in the professional field, fame and status are not the same thing.

That's all I have to say, but many people run to support it, and what kind of grudge they have against this book.

It's okay to hack in other ways, but this way really hurts me, really don't use this way to hack the book in the wrong way, the blow is too big.

It's not once or twice.

For example, just like Sun Bin's Bin , the word Bin is the meaning of the kneecap, yes, but there are three kinds of punishment, bin foot and bin punishment, of which only the bin punishment is to remove the kneecap, "Historical Records" said well, Sun Bin is bin foot, that is, the meaning of cutting off the calf below the knee. This statement has long been popular, but there are still objections that it has to be said to be digging out the kneecap.

It's like one breath is equal to one second, my setting refers to the time to breathe quickly during a fast run, and the same as "hours", which is a military calculation method, in fact, it is to let modern readers have a more specific concept of time, reduce dyslexia, and even the author's simple intention can't be seen, what is there to be complacent?

It is also said that hand, foot and mouth disease is a modern disease, but there was no one in ancient times, but it can be calculated according to the pathology, this thing was put in ancient times as pediatric aphthous ulcers, acne and the like, and the pathology of the disease is very similar, but the name of this disease in later generations is more specific and detailed.

There are also people who accuse the six sub-saints in the book of being wrong, King Wen and Xunzi were not low in status, so they don't say it, as for the other four, they are "canonized" characters in the "now" Confucian Temple, why do some people look down on the four of them and have to let others replace them by the way, insisting that the author is making it up?

Do you really think that if I see which disciple of Confucius will be canonized if it is pleasing to the eye, and will not be given a holy position if it is not pleasing to the eye?

I am certainly not omniscient and omnipotent, and I will correct my mistakes, but if someone is wrong, what does it mean to look down on others?

It's not that I'm not calm, I don't actually want to say this, but since the book was issued, I've been repeating these things continuously, and I've been holding it back for almost a year, and I really can't hold it back.

Alas, this kind of thing, I said, some people must say that you are the author of the wrong mentality, do not accept criticism, narrow-mindedness, how about the rest of the sins, I don't say, many readers are misled, and really think that I am making up nonsense and taking the fake as the truth.

Well, in fact, I didn't really get angry, because I was better at introspection, after all, the most ignorant one, I also felt that I was very good, and I didn't have any ability but looked down on others.

Today, I am talking about this to prevent scholars from being led astray by those people, and I ask you to take the correct content of the book as the criterion, and represent and ...... in Confuciusism, Mencius Thought, Xunzi Theory, and Dong Zhongshu's Great Unification Under the guidance of the two who dare not continue, build a socialist harmonious Shengyuan Continent!(To be continued......