This question is actually very broad, and it is generally considered that this kind of problem is to argue that a series of novels such as romance novels, science fiction novels, etc., are different or have their own advantages and disadvantages

And I'm talking about only two genres here, and all the novels that I think can be divided into these two genres——— literary fiction and linguistic fiction

Presumably, everyone must be confused here——— aren't all novels literary works? Why are there still verbal novels? Slow and slow, listen to me one by one

As the name suggests, literary novels are very literary novels, just like the four famous novels, and a series of articles that can be passed down for centuries. They are all highly literary, and their authors have devoted their lives to their work. Has a fairly high literary attainment.

Why is there such a high level of literary attainment? One is the writer himself——— this author himself has poetry and books in his belly, which is the inner aspect. The external aspect is that he has to revise an article several times in order to make it more literary. Of course, we all know that if a string is arbitrarily cut on the original, the probability of its obtuse angle is 1/4, the probability of an acute angle is 3/4, and the probability of being a right angle is zero, but there can still be a circumferential angle that is a right angle.

In fact, there is such a situation in literary creation that the circumference angle of the garden is equal to 90 degrees. Some authors just don't publish their articles as soon as they write. Every word is written with a literary quality, which is a rare talent in human society

Of course, for this kind of literary novel, he must have an original manuscript, whether it is a manuscript or an electronic manuscript, in short, he has his own manuscript. And most of us don't know about this manuscript. Without the support of the manuscript, how can there be such a literary work?

However, in terms of eternity, a work without a manuscript has no soul. This sentence does not summarize all works, this sentence can be used within a certain range like Newton's laws, and I suggest that literary works are better written by hand, so that you have feelings for every word of yours. Even if you later forgot what these articles are for you? But one thing is clear to you——— my work is not made up.

We're all Maxima, but we just haven't met each other

One of the drawbacks of literary works is that they are not easy to adapt into something particularly visually strong such as drama. It is very difficult to adapt a literary work into a visual work. I once adapted a 116-paragraph poem I had written into a play, and I worked from 12 p.m. to 3 p.m. to complete five acts. It's really difficult,

I don't say these things to attack literary works, this is really difficult, and there are some beauty that cannot be appreciated through vision, and can only rely on the characteristics of the text to convey this beauty

Of course, the article of saliva is different. Because he is purely a verbal record, that is, what I say, he is, and sometimes he is subject to the limitations of technology. Its practical hand typing is also literary, because you have already thought about and processed these words when you typed them. And the saliva work, he is purely the author's language, and what the author thinks can be said directly and recorded. You can not be limited by the subject-verb-object, and you can compose anytime and anywhere

As I said earlier, the work of saliva is pure language. So he has a great advantage in visual literature. Because I don't have to reimagine his language anymore. The language is simple and authentic, and it is a script that only needs to be bracketed with the description of the tape action of some scenes

This article is written in language, and there is no literary processing in the whole process

Although both forms of fiction are the embodiment of the author's personal thoughts, there is a big difference between them. is like Qu Yuan's divorce, he is a literary work, just to reflect Qu Yuan's inner melancholy. His literary expression is that he would rather die in exile than endure it. And the linguistic expression of this sentence is: I would rather let the water wash away my body than be in such a situation.

Therefore, a linguistic work is a dialogue between the author and the reader. It's the author and you who are holding a maza, wearing a vest and big pants, sitting at the door and doing homework. You may not understand what the author is trying to say, but you will feel that he has a sense of intimacy. I think you've felt that intimacy when you read this

And literary works, he is like this: I stand on a nine-story platform and sing for you. Opera is a very high level of education, and every sentence in the opera may not be understood, even if it is a conversation between a person buying firewood and selling firewood, it is very literary. As readers, everyone's cultural level is different, although there are now nine years of compulsory education, and there are various ways to encourage education and education. However, due to the difference in age and age, it is not necessarily possible to understand the advanced things in place. Therefore, literary works need a certain level of literacy to be able to read and understand

If we talk about it from the level of roots, that is: the works of language painting, he talks about intimacy. Literary works, he is the essence. (Personally, no one thinks they are not the best) works of language painting, no matter how many years have passed, you feel that he is speaking static. Literary works are different, and your understanding of the same literary work is different at each age. Just like many celebrities, everyone says that watching Dream of Red Mansions every decade is a different feeling. Of course, I don't understand it either

Although the two types of fiction have their own advantages and disadvantages, we still need to look at them dialectically, and the two main types of novels are correct, each taking what it needs. We must also encourage creativity

I think that a good author is judged by his literary works. Rather, it is to allow him to make a linguistic work in words in a short period of time. If this linguistic work is literary, then it proves that the author is of a very high level

In terms of the efficiency of writing, linguistic works are much more efficient than literary works. Linguistic works can be exported into chapters, while literary works need to be repeatedly considered and revised, and there must be many manuscripts among them

To sum up, I think the best way to reflect the level of a writer is to write a literary, verbal novel. The requirement is that the work you write has a certain literary quality, and at the same time, it must make the reader feel relatable. Instead of making his work into a concert or a vest and a big pants horse at the gate, he sat at the gate with a horse and two people in suits and leather shoes, chatting about family life