Of course it's not true.

Hua Fei stood up and replied, "Teacher, he slandered me. ”

"I didn't slander you, you didn't admit it when you stole it! It's not you, hurry up and give me back the money! The boy turned around, his chest heaving violently, pointing at Hua Fei's nose and screaming excitedly.

Just looking at his justified expression and reaction, it really seems that he is not lying, which convinces everyone present.

Feeling the approving glances from his classmates in the class, the boy was full of confidence and said: "I said that you stole it, you stole it, unless you have evidence to prove that you didn't steal it, otherwise you stole it, pay back the money, pay back the money!" ”

Huh.

If a slanderer wants the person he slanders to show evidence to prove his innocence first, shouldn't he first present evidence to prove the guilt of others?

"I don't owe you money, why should I pay you back? There is no evidence to casually point out that a person is a thief and will lose your money? If you can slander someone so justifiably with just one sentence, 'It's not you, who else?' then I say that you stole my 100,000 yuan, I can also say, 'It's not you, who else', and you show evidence to prove that you didn't steal my 100,000 yuan, otherwise you stole it." Hua Fei raised the bar.

Things are getting worse.

From the five-dollar problem to the 100,000-dollar problem.

Hua Fei just said this on purpose, so as to lure the other party to continue to raise the bar and find an opportunity to completely turn her face, she really had itchy hands.

In fact, the teacher knew that Hua Fei said that the boy stole her 100,000 yuan, which was just an example, and brought the matter back to the popular theory of who advocated and who presented evidence.

Whether it is Hua Fei stealing five yuan from him in the other party's mouth and Hua Fei stealing 100,000 yuan from her in the other party's mouth, the nature is the same, and they are all empty words.

The boy said that Hua Fei stole five yuan from him, and at least he had to come up with evidence to prove that Hua Fei stole his five yuan.

If you doubt, you will say the words of doubt, instead of recognizing the sentence "It's not you who else, I say it's you and it's you".

The boy was angry at the moment, and he interpreted his arrogance and unreasonableness to the extreme, and pointed at Hua Fei's nose in front of the teacher and scolded: "You dirt bun, village beggar, hillbilly, you are really laughing to death when you talk, your father who is a beggar doesn't have 100,000 yuan to pick up garbage all his life!" ”

Hearing what he said, Hua Fei turned his face on the spot and didn't recognize anyone, kicked off the chair behind him and walked towards him.

In everyone's incredulous gaze, Hua Fei walked up to the boy and slapped him without hesitation.

"Smack."

It's quiet.

It was very quiet, and a "pop" slap echoed in the classroom for a long time.

The eyes of the students in the class widened without exception.

They didn't expect that "Zhang Xiaobei", who has always been submissive, can only cry when encountering problems, and will only keep bullying and being at the mercy of others, will actually beat people?

And this is in front of the teacher.

What they may have seen is a fake "Zhang Xiaobei".

Especially An Huan, who was sitting in the back row, was still thinking about how to bully Hua Fei in the future, so that Hua Fei slapped her with slippers during the lunch break.

But now, seeing that Hua Fei really didn't agree with each other, she began to be a little afraid of Hua Fei.

The classmates in the class had complicated faces: if the boy scolded "Zhang Xiaobei", they had all scolded "Zhang Xiaobei" like that before.

In the past, Zhang Xiaobei would only be angry with them and didn't dare to refute it, but now there seems to be something different from before.