Section 3: The Stimulation of Human Use ValueHuman beings, as a member of the natural world, have the same value as other things, including natural value, functional value and use value; The natural attributes of human beings are basically universally recognized, and Marx also put forward it in his 1844 Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts

"The natural nature of man", he clearly stated: "Man belongs directly to natural beings". So here we don't need to go into a lot of trouble, just briefly describe, first of all, from the perspective of human life, human beings are the existence of nature.

The existence of human life is the same as the existence of other things in nature. Whether it is a human being, an animal, or something else, from an existential point of view, it must rely on nature.

Secondly, from the perspective of the individual person, man is a biological being. Man is in nature to carry out his life activities, human life activities are based on the natural world, in order to survive, man will inevitably follow the laws of nature, in this point, man and animals are have

"Identity"; So how to distinguish between the natural value and the functional value of human beings, that is, the difference between natural attributes and functional attributes of human beings: the natural attributes of human beings are the ability of human beings to use their own attributes to create value, and functional attributes are the ability of human beings to use other things to create value through learning; For example, the natural ability of a person to carry stones by physical strength is his natural value, and if a person learns the principle of levers and other physical knowledge, it belongs to functional value; The natural value of human beings is reflected in the production together with their use value

"Human value" can only function in the same way as itself, that is, it can only change the form of matter according to nature.

As we all know, the cycle creation of nature itself is based on the mutual transformation of matter and energy between natural objects to achieve self-regulation, cyclic reproduction, and symbiotic evolution as the basic characteristics and orientation.

In the process of nature's own circular creation, there is no transitional need for natural objects, and there is no waste and pollution.

The value expressed by man through natural value and use value follows the universal ecological law of natural ecosystem and material transformation, just like the production of nature; In fact, generally we say that the value of people usually refers to the simultaneous possession of these three values, and only at the same time with these three values is a valuable resource, if only one or two of these values are present, the overall value is reduced, such as the teacher who teaches a certain skill, he only has its natural value and functional value for the skill, and does not have its use value (not for the whole); So when you hire an excavator, you don't go to a technical school to give money to the teacher; So is this teacher's skill valuable, according to his Western economic utility theory, standing on the podium?

"Say it with your mouth."

What is "efficacy", and how can this effectiveness be judged? It can be seen that it is okay to analyze the market with utility theory, and it is a bit too far-fetched to judge the value of a thing. We can further extend from this, it may be clearer, for example, there are two players, set to a certain time after the automatic playback, one plays noise, the other is Einstein's theory of relativity, for the average person its utility should be the same, sound the same

"Noise", then what about their value, is it the same, let's take a look, its natural value is the same, its functional value is also the same, its use value?

Do you think that the value of broadcasting Einstein's theory of relativity is the same as playing noise, no one should think like this, so the value of a player playing Einstein's theory of relativity is greater than that of playing noise, but it is far less than the value of its theory of relativity being applied; You can guess that for the average person, there may be a very talented person who understands Einstein's theory of relativity, but maybe no one will ever understand it, can the utility theory accept this possibility?

So it is not suitable to explain the value of things; Through this experiment, we can also take a look at the teacher, although he does not have use value in terms of the corresponding skills, but in terms of a person's overall value, he has use value, which is also what we need to pay attention to; For this example, we also need to note that the difference between the two players lies in the content they play rather than in themselves, that is to say, the use value of the player plus Einstein's theory of relativity is greater than that of the player plus the noise play, do not think that the use value of the two players is different, this is to be emphasized; The exception is that the value of playing Einstein's theory of relativity is greater than that of the murmur because Einstein's theory of relativity has functional value in addition to its natural value, while the murmur only has its natural value, so its value is less than that of the former; Some people may say that there is no natural value of noise and what is the meaning, we must know that the natural value of noise also has a certain significance, this is left for everyone to think about, in reality have we used noise?