After drawing the debate questions, Senior Sister Liang Yuanna began to talk about the skills to be used in the debate.

"Okay, the debate questions have been drawn, and today is the last time I will focus on the skills of the debate tournament for you. For the next week, you'll have your own dedicated debate coach to coach you. ”

"So, the last lesson, cherish it."

I looked at Senior Sister Liang Yuanna's last meaningful look, and whispered to Xing Sisi: "Why do I think this is not a good thing?" ”

Xing Sisi also agreed, and quietly bit her ear with me: "I think too." Eighty percent of the debate coaches after us are not good talkers. ”

I was also skeptical: "So where are they going to get such a debate coach?" ”

"You're stupid." Xing Sisi looked at me with disgust and woke me up angrily: "There were so many teams in the last session, there were always one or two powerful ones, right?" And every team has the best debater, so it's the best candidate for a debate coach! ”

I nodded: "That's right." ”

"If you have a small meeting below, you have to concentrate. In the future, there will be no gentle sister like me to train everyone. ”

Xing Sisi and I heard Liang Yuanna's kind reminder, and hurriedly covered our ears and dispersed.

Liang Yuanna then continued to talk about dry goods: "Debate, we call it the art of elegant speech. Therefore, how to speak and resonate with more people is the key to success. ”

"Then let's not talk much about it, let's talk about practical skills."

"1. Question the other party's definition. At the opening stage of the opponent's argument, the key words in the debate should be defined, such as the debate question - whether the advantages of the school's lax management outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Then "loose management" needs to be defined in particular. So what is permissive management? When the other party does not have a clear definition, the right to define is in your hands and you have the initiative.

Definition is the cornerstone of the game, and if the opponent makes mistakes in the definition, that is, the opponent's definition is untenable in common sense and logic, there is basically no hope of winning. On the other hand, you should also define each word and make it logical and common-sense. ”

I heard that my scalp was numb, and every pore on my body was shouting for blood, and I quickly wrote down everything she said in my notebook.

"2. Reasonably avoid your own disadvantages. For example, if you are against lax management, does that mean that school management must be extremely strict? Of course not, we can call the management style adopted by most schools today as "lenient and strict" management. Extremely strict management is not what we are going to talk about today. In this way, you don't have to explain the definition of strict management, let alone argue about it. ”

I'll get to the point at once -- opportunism. In fact, it is also a kind of jitter.

3. You can not answer questions directly. Many times, the other person will ask the "yes or no" question for you to choose. At this time, you can answer "not necessarily" or "this question cannot be answered simply with yes or no", and then start to say your argument to avoid jumping into the trap of the other party. ”

I summarized it in my notebook again - Tai Chi

"4. Common sense is greater than example and more logic than logic. In the course of the debate, do not make statements that go against common sense, as this will give the other side an opportunity. When you prove your point, use more examples to prove it. For example, you can put forward some of the harsh school rules of the world's leading universities to show that good schools do not adopt lax management. Logical proofs, on the other hand, are the most tedious and time-consuming, and unless you can explain your logic in less than fifteen seconds, it will not be very effective in a debate. ”

I listened without blinking my eyes, nodding my head again and again, and giving examples and arguments is indeed a good way to try and test. The image is easy to understand.

5. Expand the other party's point of view indefinitely. For example, "According to the opponent's argument, lax management is conducive to the development of the school, so should we abandon our thick school rules?" "Putting the other person in a ridiculous place is a common technique."

My eyes lit up, and I kept trying to do it - I didn't have to do everything, grasp a point, and fight to the death.

6. You can ask the other party to answer "yes or no", but nine times out of ten, the other party will avoid it. However, at this time, you can point out that the opponent blindly avoids and does not dare to answer the question head-on, which will have a certain psychological pressure effect on the player. ”

I hurriedly continued to write it down in a small notebook -- to put appropriate psychological pressure on the other party to lose the favor of the audience and the judges first, and to gain a certain advantage for myself.

7. Any point of view put forward by the other party must be proved by the other party. For example, the other party pointed out that "loose management can stimulate students' creativity". Then you should ask the other party to explain "why lax management stimulates creativity" or "what percentage of students are stimulated" or "does it stimulate the creativity of individual students while making more students lazy", otherwise the other party's argument is unfounded. ”

My admiration for Senior Sister Liang Yuanna is simply overflowing, and the tricks are all fatal and ruthless - self-justification, if you don't go back, your arguments are incorrect, the arguments are insufficient, and they are not convincing

8. Give some examples for the other party to explain. For example, many schools are semi-militarized, but there are no "semi-sanatorium-managed" schools, why? ”

This technique is even more poisonous and wonderful -- secretly replacing the other side's position, standing on the opposite side of the other side's position, asking questions, waiting for an opportunity to find loopholes, and indirectly refuting our viewpoint.

"9. Use more data to speak. You can investigate how many of the random 100 students are studying at 8 p.m., and how many are playing games and watching movies, to prove that many people are still lazy under the not lax management. "Sands Chinese

"It is especially important to note here that the data can be inaccurate, but it must be in line with common sense and logic, and cannot be taken for granted. Debate is a search for the truth, and if the data is inaccurate, there is no need to debate. ”

I nodded, unscrupulous means are not advisable, but we still have to keep our original intention.

"10. Give something a character. For example, "learning" has the property of "you must work hard to complete it well". And does lax management lead to laziness among students, and does this affect learning? You can challenge and ask for an explanation. ”

Such an idea is actually quite understandable. The first is to delay time, and the second is to unify the points of debate between the two sides to the same height, and the points to be debated by the two sides can also be concentrated together, so that the whole debate competition can be highly coordinated and completed beautifully.

11. Let the other party give a comparison standard. How to judge "the disadvantages outweigh the advantages" or "the advantages outweigh the disadvantages" in the debate? The other party may only mention certain advantages and disadvantages, but how do you compare which is bigger and which is smaller? This is a question that should be asked. When the other party can't make a clear comparison, you can use your own comparison. Regarding the formulation of comparative standards, it can be "whether it is conducive to the development of college students". However, it is important to know that the standard of comparison is only a skill, not a very important fundamental issue. Don't spend the whole game discussing the rights and wrongs of the standards of both sides. ”

Comparison is a very clever point, highlighting who is more, rather than blindly highlighting the advantages or disadvantages. There must be a more such concept, both sides insist on their own words, and the debate competition will be exciting.

After saying these skills, Senior Sister Liang Yuanna was very relaxed, and the rookies below who were busy taking notes were very busy, and raised a pair of eager eyes, hoping to repeat them and write down what they missed and didn't remember.

I looked at the full notes, I felt a sense of accomplishment, and when I saw the expression of Senior Sister Liang Yuanna, I became more and more respectful and worshipful.

He is worthy of being the captain of the debate team, and he is really powerful.

Senior Sister Liang Yuanna smiled mysteriously, hiding her merit and fame, and smiled indifferently: "Don't look at me with such adoring eyes." The debate coach of each team is also the best, no worse than me, and then you will think that I have nothing to admire. ”

The audience immediately burst into a sparse "No", "Senior sister, you will always be the most powerful in my heart" rainbow fart praise, which made Liang Yuanna laugh constantly.

After taking the last intensive training class in such a meaningful and fulfilling way, the students left in twos and threes.

Just as Xing Sisi and I were packing up our things and preparing to leave, a nice girl behind us stopped us.

We turned our heads and saw a chubby girl with a shawl, smiling faintly, but with a capable temperament; There was also a smiling girl with black silk rimmed glasses and a beautiful face, standing side by side, waiting for us to respond.

The chubby girl didn't wait for us to get closer, so she stretched out her hand and smiled at us: "Xing Sisi, Fang Jinyu, hello, I am your teammate, Kang Juan." ”

Before we could react, the girl with long hair next to us pushed her glasses and introduced herself to us seriously: "Hello, I'm your teammate, Zhao Yu." ”

My heart and eyes lit up at the moment when Zhao Yu finished introducing himself.

Lit up my whole world.

Coupled with the replacement of Li Zhaoqi by the data clerk, our team is complete.

The economy team can win the enemy!

After a brief period of self-introduction and a brief awkwardness, we quickly got together.

In order to quickly cultivate a tacit understanding among the whole team, we decided to call Li Zhaoqi to have dinner together.

So, I could only send a message to Jiang Yueze, telling him that we couldn't eat together at night.

Kang Juan chatted a little better than Zhao Yushan, but she was still a style of cherishing words like gold, watching me text Jiang Yueze, she just showed a mocking look in her eyes and didn't say a word.

Xing Sisi, on the other hand, never regarded himself as an outsider, and teased very unceremoniously: "What? Do you want to release pigeons again? The minister is not angry with you, is he? ”

I glanced at her and found that Zhao Yu also had a curious look in his eyes, so he replied to her very gently: "No." At most, it's a hum, and then I'll feel guilty for a long time. ”

"Yo, do you still know guilt?" Xing Sisi seemed to have heard some terrible joke, and looked at me incredulously: "I thought you would be like those girls, unreasonable and perfunctory and cold ministers?" ”

The corners of my eyes twitched, and I couldn't help but say, "That's you, right?" Pervert! ”

Xing Sisi stuck out his tongue proudly: "Slightly." ”

Dog stuff!