Although "Ten Consecutive Slashes of God Killing" is set up as a game of confrontation, after all, it is only a question and answer of archaeological expertise, and there is no gamepad or keyboard and mouse, only two remote control boards, which were passed over by the students in front of them and handed to Ruan Fanghua and Liu Cheng respectively.

On the eight large wraparound screens, which have been split into two, two names have appeared: Liu Cheng on the left and Ruan Fanghua on the right.

Below the person's name is a gray character anime character set by the system, and the men and women are distinct.

The first is to choose your character's identity and weapon.

There are only five fixed identities: scholar (talented girl), chivalrous (chivalrous woman), fast catcher, thief, and chincha.

weapons, dazzling, in addition to the traditional eighteen weapons, there are also very strange weapons that have appeared in various film and television dramas.

Liu Cheng chose a scholar, the weapon was a flying sword in a fan, and the originally static gray portrait soon became the appearance of an ancient white-clothed genius shaking a folding fan gracefully, and that portrait was obviously Liu Cheng. The fan is shaking, the eyes, hands and feet are moving, the background is the mountain scenery, and it is slowly moving to the Yuxian Bridge in the Taohuayuan Scenic Area.

Ruan Fanghua chose a thief, the original static gray portrait quickly became a red-clothed female thief with a meniscus double knife in her hand, that portrait is obviously Ruan Fanghua. The hair ornament is plain, the waist-length hair dances with the wind, it is not messy, but there is a sense of light and elegant, and the background is also a mountain view, but it is slightly different from the angle of the mountain scenery where Liu Cheng is located.

A few seconds later, the two met on the Yuxian Bridge.

The female thief Ruan Fanghua waved the meniscus knife in her hand, played with it and took the lead in asking questions.

"Liu Cheng should understand the excavation of the Hongshan cultural settlement site of Chifeng Weijiayingzi, this site excavated 32 sites, there are large and small, there are two groups of different orientations, there is a very good preliminary work, after full investigation, the base point was established, and the theoretical layout was made, with this basis, you can carry out some sampling excavations, random and key can be carried out, the former is helpful for understanding the general distribution of the remains, the latter can get some key understanding, combined with sampling excavation, With the same amount of work and excavation area, we can get more archaeological information, but we always feel that something is missing. In this regard, please Liu Cheng share his views. ”

This is an archaeological practice question, if you have not paid attention to the Weijiayingzi site, have not carefully understood, naturally can not answer, even if blind, there is no way to start.

Ruan Fanghua happened to be studying the excavation of this settlement last semester, and she happened to talk about it with the sisters in dormitory 502 last week, and the other four girls didn't know the news at all, so she used it to test Liu Cheng.

I hope Liu Cheng didn't pay attention to the excavation of this settlement.

Liu Cheng didn't think about it, and answered almost in seconds.

"For the excavation of the settlement, the overall layout is very crucial. In fact, excavating any site wants to understand the overall pattern, however, it is often unrealistic, who will give you the funds? In addition, archaeologists do not advocate thorough excavations because they want to preserve some of the contents for the future, but rather to obtain a holistic understanding, they should combine large-scale excavations and conduct sample excavations. If there's something missing. I think perhaps it should be called the work of 'microarchaeology'. Just like when we study a stone tool, after understanding the general characteristics, we need to pick up a magnifying glass or even a microscope to observe it in detail. It's impossible to look at every single site in detail, but I think it's necessary to select a few typical sites for microscopic research, and to uncover some information that we have never seen before. For example, the earthen platform next to the stove, the groups of utensils in some houses, or the burned living surface. More attention should be paid to such remains, the form of the dumping of the utensils, the soil samples and residues in the utensils, the residues on the living surface, etc., are all objects of concern, and we can flotation and fine sift all the accumulations. This kind of microscopic research is like a crime-solving detective who treats a crime scene. It's not realistic or necessary to study all the relics in detail, we need critical information, so there must be critical research on key scenarios. In other words, the fine places should not be missed. Compared with archaeology a hundred years ago, the important progress of contemporary archaeology is not only that we now have many advanced scientific and technological methods, such as dating, zooarchaeology, botanical archaeology, geoarchaeology, etc., but also that it should also include the great progress of archaeology in theory. Before archaeological excavations, there is a need for sufficient theoretical research on the settlement form, livelihood mode, and relationship with the environment of Hongshan culture. It is also possible to carry out analogous research, mainly experimental and ethnoarchaeological work, such as the production and use of pottery and stone tools, the collection of raw materials, and the construction of buildings, which can be carried out experimentally and ethnoarchaeology, which is most appropriate to carry out during the field period. Finally, I would like to say that when looking at archaeological materials, it is necessary to look at them from the perspective of the process of site formation. Archaeological materials from raw materials to production, to use, storage, abandonment, recycling, and then to be buried, natural transformation and other processes, and finally found that the impact of this series of processes on archaeological materials can not be regarded as a blank, archaeologists must understand the formation process of archaeological materials to draw scientific conclusions, just like the criminal investigators who solve the case must understand the formation process of the scene, otherwise they cannot come up with a reliable explanation. We can now fully reveal a scene, but we still need to study how it came to be, and how man-made and natural causes played a role in it. Actually, I still have some opinions to talk about, but if I continue to talk about it, I'm afraid it will delay everyone's rest time! So be it. ”

Ruan Fanghua's double knives struck twice in the air, and he could only regret giving up.

Liu Cheng's fan shook, and the flying sword hidden in the fan did not show up, and directly began to ask questions.

His first question concerns both ancient warfare and ancient daily life.