I've been following the night book, and the start is good, although there is a suspicion of patchwork, but overall it is still very exciting; But I really can't stand it lately, but the more Green Park writes in the third season, the more it plagiarizes history, it's too uninspiring, is it to make up the number of words?

- A reader

reply

Hello friends, I saw your message and found that your message is representative, because there are also some readers who have similar questions, and I just want to answer them.

First of all, thank you for your compliments on this novel, thank you very much, I will continue to work hard.

Secondly, although the opening is a lot of lines that come together at the end, I personally think that this is not the same thing as "piecing things together", what I put together is also what I have in my own mind, and there is nothing else in the east and west.

Third, you said that the third season "plagiarized history", I personally think that history cannot be plagiarized, nor can it be plagiarized, all the novels we write, aside from the various coats, their essence is historical fiction and romance novels, no matter what the subject matter, human nature exists in history and love, what kind of history and love you have experienced or know, it is easy to express something, if this is also plagiarism, it is also plagiarism of your own knowledge.

History moves in a spiral, and many events are similar, so it's easy to feel similar. Jin Yong said that "Smiling Proud Jianghu" does not specifically refer to any historical period, but the commonality of the entire human historical period. Original words: "Because I want to write about some common characters, common phenomena in life, this book has no historical background, which means that similar situations can occur in any dynasty." ”

If readers think that a certain story in the novel is familiar and ugly at a glance, it is not that anyone wants to write it ugly, but that the reader has already determined its truth and ugliness in the subconscious heart, and it has nothing to do with the author. If not, on the contrary, it would be untrue, let alone "plagiarized" a piece of "history".

Regarding "making up the number of words", I believe most readers know that the main original literature websites are now dominated by Xiaobaiwen, and they don't know that Baishui is as harmless and useless as millions of words, is it counted as making up the number of words? If some readers think that it doesn't count, then it can basically be concluded that this part of the audience is divided by "whether there are many fight scenes" or not, and do not think that it is more difficult to write non-combat articles that describe human nature in depth. Hey ha in Xiaobaiwen, boom! Since I can't agree that this kind of text produces pleasure, it is very likely that this part of the audience will be lost, which is a pity, but there is no way. If that's the case, I basically won't explain about making up the word count, because even my completely non-YY articles count as making up the word count, so how can there be a novel that doesn't make up the word count?

Finally, regarding Jiang Lang's talent, it should be said that readers have their own opinions. Maybe from the moment I was going to write the novel at the beginning, countless foreshadowing was also for today's description, maybe it was really Jiang Lang's talent, or maybe he didn't have any talent at all, and it was not easy to persist in writing until now. Of course, in any case, this novel is barely qualified, because it writes history and love.

Thank you. Please also continue to support ~