First of all, thank you: liujianbo, the monk Shakyamuni, the two one, ~West Window Rain~ and other book friends for their reminders. www.biquge.info It is with everyone's help that this book will become more and more rigorous.

I've always paid attention to the logic of the article, but I've been careful about it, and there has been a logical loophole in the last few chapters.

The process of fighting the cosmic civilization of the Guguding Star Domain should not be carried out in the four-dimensional space. This is because the scientific and technological level of human civilization is temporarily incapable of establishing an effective defense system in the four-dimensional space.

In other words, in the fourth dimension, the enemy's space mines and other attack methods can ignore the defense of the Phantom Battleship and directly attack the interior of the battleship from the fourth dimensional dimension.

In the same way, the other side will face the same problem, so everyone will not choose the four-dimensional space as the frontal battlefield (perhaps choose the cross-dimensional raid). If the fleets of the warring parties fight in the four-dimensional space, it will be a very tragic scene, in the four-dimensional space all the warships can not defend at all, once they fight, they can only fight hand-to-hand, fists to the bone!!

Therefore, the reasonable logic should be: the expeditionary force was successfully forced back into the three-dimensional space by the opponent's moving space thunder sea, but in the three-dimensional space, the powerful defense of the human fleet was also well demonstrated.

At the same time, wars across three-dimensional and four-dimensional spaces will also make the situation extremely complicated, not only to win a low-dimensional head-on confrontation, but also to warn of high-dimensional strikes that may appear at any time. This is arguably the most complicated battle in the history of human civilization so far.

To sum up, I started with chapter 402 and corrected the relevant content of the article.

Thank you again for your support.