If society wants to progress, it will continue to produce new things. And when a new thing arrives, the reaction of the three social strata is different. Let's analyze how the three social classes react differently to new things.

Grassroots society

Blind xenophobia

The grassroots society does not seek to be motivated, does not learn, and has a rigid mind, so it is difficult to adapt to a change, because they have been running around for a long time for a living, and they look at people's faces every day, as long as they do not adapt, they will do the wrong thing, and the consequence of doing the wrong thing is to be deducted from the already very meager salary, and even lose their jobs in serious cases, so they have an instinctive fear of future changes. Therefore, if the middle class wants to achieve any change in their enterprises, the strongest opposition is often the grassroots employees. For example, some production processes of enterprises need to be computerized, and grassroots employees will worry that they will not be able to learn because they have not been exposed to computers, so they will be laid off by the enterprise. If the company engages in training, the grassroots employees are even more worried, and they are even more worried that this is another way to lay off employees, and in the end, whoever is not qualified will be laid off. The grassroots society always chooses to avoid the difficulties of life, but all problems cannot be avoided, the society is progressing, and we can only adapt. If something new is in line with the development of the times, it will not work if you refuse it. History is developing, society is progressing, we look at the whole world, including all living beings in nature, are following the law of survival of the fittest, only in this way can we continue to thrive, in order to become stronger from generation to generation. All backward ideas and outdated people, will eventually be eliminated, if the enterprise does not change, will be eliminated by the times, the enterprise is finished, in the grassroots employees are not all lost? As the saying goes: "Under the nest, there are eggs?" But the grassroots society just doesn't understand this truth, so as soon as there is a change, they desperately obstruct it, and they don't want to think about it, which excellent enterprise in the world is decided by the grassroots? Which corporate culture is developed at the grassroots level? Which development strategy is proposed at the grassroots level? Blind opposition can only be a mantis arm blocking the car, and what the grassroots society should really do is to learn and grow quickly, even if it can't keep pace with the times, at least it can keep up with the tail of the times, and not be eliminated.

Middle class

Analyze the pros and cons.

There are both desirable and undesirable aspects of the middle class in dealing with new things: the advantage of the middle class is that it can analyze the pros and cons more deeply than the grassroots society. The common problem of the middle class is that their pros and cons have always been selfish. They analyze things as if they draw a circle with themselves as the center, if the scope of their interests can be covered, then there is a possibility of acceptance, if their circle is really not reached, then give up accepting new things, selfishness is not wrong, but excessive selfishness will affect their own pattern, it will become a mouse. The thinking of the middle class is flat, not three-dimensional, and only two points are needed to draw a circle, while three-dimensional thinking is needed. A person cannot survive without self-awareness, and a person cannot develop without interest analysis, but if a person cannot look at the world, there will be no pattern. What the middle class lacks is the kind of pattern that looks at the whole world. If the grassroots society is for the survival of its own individuals and does not consider the rise and fall of enterprises, then the middle society is for the immediate small profits of its own enterprises, without considering the entire economic trend. Both the grassroots and the middle society are selfish, but the focus of the grassroots society is on themselves, and the focus of the middle society is on their own enterprises. If it does not conform to the law of economic development, the enterprise will surely perish. Although the attitudes of the grassroots society and the middle class towards new things are different, the nature of their mistakes is the same, that is, "a leaf blinds the eyes of Mount Tai". Therefore, if you can't let go of your selfishness to think about problems, you will never have a patterned vision.

High Society

Learn more.

In fact, everything must have its reason, and the existence of every phenomenon must have its cause. The high-level society understands this, so it can understand new things more deeply. The reason why the high-level society can become the leader of an excellent enterprise, or even an industry leader, is that they can often find the reason from the law of development of things, as the saying goes: "How big the tree is, how deep the roots are." "The high-level society is not selfish, the high-level society is also a person, not a god, and the high-level society also grew up eating grains. However, the essential difference between the high-level society and the middle-class society is that the high-level society will let go of personal affairs when considering problems. It is precisely because they can look at the rise and fall of the times from the perspective of the long river of history that they can judge whether the new thing conforms to the law of historical development, so that they can infer whether the new thing is short-lived or long-lasting. For myself, it is a trap for investment, but also an opportunity for development. People's IQ is about the same, and the high-level society is not very high-IQ, but everyone considers the problem from different angles and heights, and the reason why the high-level society can look at new things more objectively is because the high-level society looks at the overall situation and does not pay attention to small profits, and can look at the long-term without considering the present.

Therefore, in the end, in the final analysis, it is necessary to improve the height of thinking and expand the pattern of life, otherwise even if you learn to be rich and rich, you can only do nothing. Knowledge can only judge the appearance of new things, wisdom can judge the laws of new things, and patterns can judge the value and significance of new things.