When it comes to the ideological level of the three social strata, I would like to borrow a vivid metaphor: it is like the process of human growth from childhood to adulthood. Let's take a closer look.

Grassroots society is like a kindergarten, where things have to be clearly separated.

People in the grassroots society are actually like kindergarten children, they do multiple-choice questions every day, we see the kindergarten aunt telling children every day, this big bad wolf is a bad person, the little white rabbit is a good person, this thing is right, that thing is wrong. So they think that people are either good or bad, and things are either good or bad. In fact, when people first begin to recognize things, right and wrong are very important, because this will directly affect his future values, so he must have a sense of justice and be a good person from an early age, so as to be a person who contributes to society and the country and is valuable. However, the psychological state of the grassroots society is completely stuck in the embryonic stage of this cognition of people, and they will judge things very simply, and they often do not take into account the deeper things, so they will only look at the superficial phenomena. Under the guidance of the concept of right and wrong, they will say some out-of-character things and do some out-of-the-ordinary things, which is what we often call "childish words", but it is very sad that people only stay at this stage in their lives.

Middle class is like middle school, things are multiple-choice, and there are different interpretations of the same thing.

The middle class is like a person in middle school, the teacher will tell them that right and wrong are not so clear, here is a quote from Mr. Jin Yong: "There are no absolute good people in this world, and there are no absolute bad people." There are only good people with shortcomings, and bad people with advantages. "The middle-class society's cognition of society has changed from a multiple-choice question to a multiple-choice question, and they will analyze and know people in a slightly complex way, so as to know what shortcomings and advantages that person has, and to develop their strengths and avoid weaknesses in the world. It is true that the understanding of the middle class is further than that of the grassroots society, but it is still far from enough, because they only analyze it from a personal point of view, and even take their own advantages and disadvantages as the starting point, and it is completely for their own consideration. The result of this is that they only know things in circles of their own subjectivity, so their pattern will not be very large.

High-level society is like a university, there is no standard answer to things in itself, and the so-called answers are all artificially imposed definitions.

The high-level society is like a person who goes to college, and the university teacher never gives the answer to the question. Because there is no standard answer in this world, and human beings are progressing, the answer of the present will be overturned by the answer of the future. It's like it's going to rain, some people scold when it rains, and some people scold when it doesn't rain, but it still rains when it should rain, and it rains when it should be sunny, and it is not guided by human will at all. It is precisely because the sunshine and rain nourish all things that our world is colorful. So the top society knows a truth: when your thinking is very stubborn, you are not far from mistakes; When you define something, the mind starts to stiffen. Therefore, they will retain some opinions for the time being, and at the same time, they will look at the problem from the perspective of development, so as to keep up with the changes of the times and keep pace with the times.